WEBVTT

00:00:15.574 --> 00:00:16.663
<v Riley Bowman>And welcome to the Concealed Carry

00:00:16.663 --> 00:00:21.205
<v Riley Bowman>Podcast, part of the ConcealedCarry.com network, brought to you by HK.

00:00:22.180 --> 00:00:29.076
<v Riley Bowman>Today is Wednesday, July 1st, 2026, as of the recording of this live episode.

00:00:30.104 --> 00:00:34.695
<v Riley Bowman>And I am your host, Riley Bowman, joined today by co-host Jacob Paulson.

00:00:35.978 --> 00:00:40.843
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm here, feeling it, feeling the season 14. I'm feeling the,

00:00:41.510 --> 00:00:44.558
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't know, just like the seriousness, importance of this episode.

00:00:44.872 --> 00:00:49.963
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah for sure uh and our apologies to you listeners uh we could have wrapped

00:00:49.963 --> 00:00:54.783
<v Riley Bowman>up season 13 in a little more you know like meaningful way like hey by the way

00:00:54.783 --> 00:00:56.534
<v Riley Bowman>this is the end of season 13,

00:00:57.434 --> 00:01:00.513
<v Riley Bowman>uh but now you know now now that one ended this isn't.

00:01:00.513 --> 00:01:01.543
<v Jacob Paulsen>Daytime tv really

00:01:01.983 --> 00:01:04.123
<v Riley Bowman>Now we are beginning number 14 we.

00:01:04.123 --> 00:01:05.164
<v Jacob Paulsen>Don't need a cliffhanger

00:01:05.512 --> 00:01:12.343
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah we do every episode should be a cliffhanger we've got to get the people to come back for more um,

00:01:14.696 --> 00:01:21.363
<v Riley Bowman>today is a really special episode because we're gonna go back to our roots and

00:01:21.363 --> 00:01:27.003
<v Riley Bowman>in some respects with regard to the podcast our very first year of the podcast our first,

00:01:27.972 --> 00:01:34.323
<v Riley Bowman>independence day episode we did a pretty you know thorough look at the events

00:01:34.323 --> 00:01:40.360
<v Riley Bowman>leading up to uh lexington and concord specifically gun control that the Brits, that the,

00:01:40.964 --> 00:01:45.068
<v Riley Bowman>British Navy and Army were trying to exact upon,

00:01:46.769 --> 00:01:47.773
<v Riley Bowman>the Colonials.

00:01:48.394 --> 00:01:52.703
<v Riley Bowman>And that was a fun time. And we replayed that episode for you last week.

00:01:52.703 --> 00:01:53.700
<v Riley Bowman>Well, it actually just went...

00:01:54.791 --> 00:01:55.747
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, it just published this week.

00:01:55.747 --> 00:01:56.247
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, it did.

00:01:56.247 --> 00:01:58.537
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, like on two days ago, I think, or something like that.

00:01:58.537 --> 00:02:02.527
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. So that just went live. And so we hope you enjoyed that.

00:02:02.527 --> 00:02:06.226
<v Riley Bowman>That's a little bit more of an in-depth look at those specific events.

00:02:06.684 --> 00:02:10.867
<v Riley Bowman>But what we're doing in this special episode in our 10th, now I guess you could

00:02:10.867 --> 00:02:15.345
<v Riley Bowman>say our 11th year of the podcast, because we are in the 11th year,

00:02:16.953 --> 00:02:22.886
<v Riley Bowman>and now approaching not just annual Independence Day, but a big one.

00:02:23.333 --> 00:02:23.913
<v Jacob Paulsen>The big one.

00:02:24.302 --> 00:02:31.367
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, this is the 250th anniversary of what we deem the founding of our nation,

00:02:31.367 --> 00:02:35.320
<v Riley Bowman>the Declaration of Independence, our breakaway officially,

00:02:37.617 --> 00:02:39.347
<v Riley Bowman>from the Brits, from England.

00:02:39.347 --> 00:02:39.947
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, it's heavy.

00:02:40.191 --> 00:02:45.487
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, super heavy. It's a big deal. It's a big, big deal. And so today we're

00:02:45.487 --> 00:02:48.010
<v Riley Bowman>going to go back through history with you.

00:02:48.617 --> 00:02:54.337
<v Riley Bowman>Our hope is that we can share with you the story, the evolution of what led

00:02:54.337 --> 00:03:00.447
<v Riley Bowman>us up to and including and beyond the establishment, the recognition through

00:03:00.447 --> 00:03:02.549
<v Riley Bowman>a formal document of the right,

00:03:03.025 --> 00:03:04.564
<v Riley Bowman>to keep and bear arms,

00:03:05.917 --> 00:03:12.656
<v Riley Bowman>which is a big part of that is a right to personal and self and community and,

00:03:13.167 --> 00:03:14.914
<v Riley Bowman>defensive country as well.

00:03:17.166 --> 00:03:23.041
<v Riley Bowman>And we're gonna go really far back we're gonna go all the way back to the 1300s even.

00:03:23.407 --> 00:03:26.277
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we're also going to come all the way forward exactly now we're gonna talk

00:03:26.277 --> 00:03:32.347
<v Jacob Paulsen>about major federal gun laws and Supreme Court decisions that have continued

00:03:32.347 --> 00:03:34.749
<v Jacob Paulsen>to shape and define what Second Amendment means for us today

00:03:34.883 --> 00:03:38.267
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah so this is really important we hope I mean it's going to be,

00:03:39.721 --> 00:03:43.721
<v Riley Bowman>I don't know. I hope we can make it interesting. I know that some people are

00:03:43.721 --> 00:03:46.070
<v Riley Bowman>like, oh, a history lesson? Tune out now.

00:03:47.081 --> 00:03:52.456
<v Riley Bowman>But we hope that you'll stick with us and listen and learn along with us about,

00:03:53.192 --> 00:03:56.564
<v Riley Bowman>all this very significant historical context.

00:03:57.061 --> 00:04:03.768
<v Riley Bowman>Because I think it's super important to us as Second Amendment believing Americans,

00:04:05.127 --> 00:04:09.132
<v Riley Bowman>to understand more about it and how it came to be and what it means.

00:04:09.335 --> 00:04:14.601
<v Riley Bowman>And understand, especially in the modern era with things like the Bruin Decision,

00:04:15.442 --> 00:04:21.375
<v Riley Bowman>back in 2022, that has created this new framework.

00:04:24.997 --> 00:04:33.240
<v Riley Bowman>Part of that framework is looking at the historical context and what it means, the Second Amendment.

00:04:34.061 --> 00:04:38.743
<v Riley Bowman>And so I think the better we can understand the historical context,

00:04:39.283 --> 00:04:43.486
<v Riley Bowman>then the better informed we'll be as gun-toting Americans.

00:04:44.241 --> 00:04:50.110
<v Riley Bowman>And so nothing more appropriate to discuss this as we honor the creation of this nation.

00:04:51.658 --> 00:04:55.851
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and I hope that we do it justice because we're not exactly professional

00:04:55.851 --> 00:04:58.752
<v Jacob Paulsen>scholars, but we care and we try.

00:04:58.886 --> 00:05:01.011
<v Riley Bowman>That's a fair point. You should get that disclaimer out of the way.

00:05:01.011 --> 00:05:03.564
<v Riley Bowman>We are not constitutional law authorities,

00:05:04.701 --> 00:05:08.961
<v Riley Bowman>or history authorities or professors or anything like that, just students of

00:05:08.961 --> 00:05:14.571
<v Riley Bowman>our own making that it's something we like and are passionate about and have

00:05:14.571 --> 00:05:17.461
<v Riley Bowman>done some research on and hope we can share with you what we've learned.

00:05:18.495 --> 00:05:24.468
<v Riley Bowman>But first, today's episode is sponsored by our special Happy Birthday America

00:05:24.654 --> 00:05:27.022
<v Riley Bowman>sale. Yeah. Why don't you tell them about us?

00:05:27.278 --> 00:05:31.381
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's super awesome. We do two big sales. I mean, we do lots of sales here and

00:05:31.381 --> 00:05:34.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>there, right? But we do two kind of major sales a year. We do the Independence

00:05:34.951 --> 00:05:38.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>Day sale. We call it Happy Birthday America sale. And then we do the Black Friday

00:05:38.931 --> 00:05:40.205
<v Jacob Paulsen>deal like everybody else.

00:05:40.716 --> 00:05:45.204
<v Jacob Paulsen>So our Happy Birthday America sale, this might be like our 8th or 9th or 10th year doing this sale.

00:05:45.709 --> 00:05:49.411
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it is open to the public, but it is certainly intended to particularly reward

00:05:49.411 --> 00:05:50.462
<v Jacob Paulsen>members of Guardian Nation.

00:05:50.833 --> 00:05:54.681
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you can go to concealedcarray.com forward slash HBA to get all the details

00:05:54.681 --> 00:05:56.597
<v Jacob Paulsen>regardless if you are or are not a member.

00:05:56.899 --> 00:06:00.197
<v Jacob Paulsen>Everybody is going to love the sale and save lots of money and get lots of cool stuff.

00:06:00.941 --> 00:06:04.801
<v Jacob Paulsen>But members are particularly rewarded. They get a deeper discount on everything

00:06:04.801 --> 00:06:09.467
<v Jacob Paulsen>like they always do. And they also will receive special vouchers of store credit

00:06:10.007 --> 00:06:11.772
<v Jacob Paulsen>after the sale based on their purchases.

00:06:12.428 --> 00:06:15.638
<v Jacob Paulsen>But here's the big one. and this is what we think is really cool.

00:06:15.940 --> 00:06:17.701
<v Jacob Paulsen>Maybe you'll think it's lame, but I'm pumped about it.

00:06:18.061 --> 00:06:20.479
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that is that this year, during the Happy Birthday America sale,

00:06:20.862 --> 00:06:25.733
<v Jacob Paulsen>everybody who places an order during the sale period will receive a special

00:06:26.069 --> 00:06:28.804
<v Jacob Paulsen>250th anniversary commemorative coin.

00:06:29.105 --> 00:06:32.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you can see pictures exactly what this coin looks like and everything just

00:06:32.981 --> 00:06:35.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>by going to concealedcarry.com forward slash HBA.

00:06:36.106 --> 00:06:38.631
<v Jacob Paulsen>But needless to say, it is epic awesome.

00:06:39.026 --> 00:06:43.041
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, it is. I got my hands on it for the first time today, actually.

00:06:43.041 --> 00:06:46.121
<v Riley Bowman>Meant to have it with me so I can hold it right up here to the camera,

00:06:46.121 --> 00:06:49.386
<v Riley Bowman>those of you that are viewing the podcast as opposed to listening only.

00:06:51.001 --> 00:06:55.940
<v Riley Bowman>It's awesome. It is spectacular in first person to be able to hold it.

00:06:56.160 --> 00:06:58.351
<v Riley Bowman>First of all, it's a good size coin. It's pretty large.

00:06:58.351 --> 00:07:00.121
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's two and a half inches. Almost two and a half inches.

00:07:00.861 --> 00:07:09.134
<v Riley Bowman>It's hefty. It's thick. It's just got beautiful engraving to it showing a lot of the,

00:07:10.566 --> 00:07:12.306
<v Riley Bowman>history, like things we're going to talk about today.

00:07:12.306 --> 00:07:16.336
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact. Yeah, I think of it this way, like that coin, one half of it is like

00:07:16.336 --> 00:07:19.879
<v Jacob Paulsen>America, be awesome, and the other half is sort of like, and guns be part of that.

00:07:20.152 --> 00:07:25.886
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, and it says on there, you know, what's the phrase?

00:07:25.886 --> 00:07:29.256
<v Riley Bowman>Freedom bought with a gun, maintained with a gun.

00:07:29.256 --> 00:07:29.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep.

00:07:29.916 --> 00:07:32.446
<v Riley Bowman>Which is kind of the title of today's episode. Freedom bought,

00:07:32.446 --> 00:07:36.070
<v Riley Bowman>freedom maintained. 700 years of receipts.

00:07:36.993 --> 00:07:39.446
<v Riley Bowman>Okay, we'll be bringing the receipts, and as I mentioned, we're going to go

00:07:39.446 --> 00:07:44.220
<v Riley Bowman>back all the way to the 1300s that's where really that's where it's first recognized,

00:07:44.986 --> 00:07:50.496
<v Riley Bowman>uh in fact some some key modern day supreme court rulings referenced uh some

00:07:50.496 --> 00:07:53.586
<v Riley Bowman>of the earliest history here that we're going to be covering and that's why

00:07:53.586 --> 00:07:56.066
<v Riley Bowman>it's relevant to today's discussion but guys don't,

00:07:56.543 --> 00:08:01.686
<v Riley Bowman>forget and don't miss it okay the sale the happy birthday america sale starts

00:08:01.686 --> 00:08:05.993
<v Riley Bowman>this week starts tomorrow in fact for guardian nation members,

00:08:07.226 --> 00:08:12.367
<v Riley Bowman>so july 2nd the sale starts concealed carry.com forward slash hba,

00:08:12.837 --> 00:08:16.826
<v Riley Bowman>if you're not already a guardian nation member you can join immediately and

00:08:16.826 --> 00:08:18.387
<v Riley Bowman>have access to that sale tomorrow,

00:08:18.851 --> 00:08:21.866
<v Riley Bowman>and so you probably want to consider doing that because one you're going to

00:08:21.866 --> 00:08:25.867
<v Riley Bowman>save the most uh not only get the extra 10 off of everything that's on sale,

00:08:26.320 --> 00:08:30.714
<v Riley Bowman>but you're going to also get that voucher post-sale, you're going to get a voucher,

00:08:31.646 --> 00:08:35.626
<v Riley Bowman>where you can basically get another 10% back, which is a big deal.

00:08:35.626 --> 00:08:38.464
<v Riley Bowman>You're really saving 35%, if you want to think of it that way.

00:08:40.072 --> 00:08:45.354
<v Riley Bowman>It's across the board. You're going to get the super awesome commemorative 250th,

00:08:46.150 --> 00:08:49.383
<v Riley Bowman>anniversary america coin that's cool uh,

00:08:50.456 --> 00:08:54.036
<v Riley Bowman>so anyway that and again that sale starts tomorrow july 2nd for everybody else

00:08:54.036 --> 00:08:57.136
<v Riley Bowman>starts july 3rd and you'll still still save big you'll still qualify for the

00:08:57.136 --> 00:09:01.396
<v Riley Bowman>coin and all that awesomeness uh you just won't save quite as much if you don't

00:09:01.396 --> 00:09:02.758
<v Riley Bowman>want to be a member of guardian nation,

00:09:03.216 --> 00:09:07.426
<v Riley Bowman>but uh the sale starts tomorrow july 2nd for all for guardian members july 3rd

00:09:07.426 --> 00:09:12.436
<v Riley Bowman>for everybody else runs through the 5th of july midnight july 5th sale closes Yeah.

00:09:12.436 --> 00:09:13.689
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's mountain time on Sunday.

00:09:13.909 --> 00:09:18.706
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. So concealedcarry.com forward slash H-B-A. And if you want to become a

00:09:18.706 --> 00:09:21.431
<v Riley Bowman>member of Guardian Nation, go to guardiannation.com.

00:09:22.401 --> 00:09:23.440
<v Riley Bowman>Let's jump into history, Jacob.

00:09:24.618 --> 00:09:30.616
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yeah. So English common law is, well, England is kind of a weird place.

00:09:30.616 --> 00:09:33.482
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we start, like you said, in the 1300s.

00:09:33.668 --> 00:09:41.036
<v Jacob Paulsen>And apparently with a concern, because this is a time where there's no guns, but there are weapons.

00:09:41.336 --> 00:09:41.470
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:09:41.842 --> 00:09:47.676
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so there's a concern, apparently, presumably, yeah, that people are intimidating

00:09:47.996 --> 00:09:53.811
<v Jacob Paulsen>or causing some disruption or unrest with their arms.

00:09:53.986 --> 00:09:58.596
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. It could be bows or crossbows or swords, knives. I know it's not.

00:09:59.216 --> 00:10:01.556
<v Riley Bowman>It doesn't matter. Okay. It's just referencing arms.

00:10:02.734 --> 00:10:09.306
<v Riley Bowman>So this is where this begins, because understand this, that even in the Bruin

00:10:09.306 --> 00:10:11.816
<v Riley Bowman>decision of the modern era,

00:10:12.496 --> 00:10:19.696
<v Riley Bowman>they referenced this statue, this old English statue from, get this, 1328.

00:10:20.519 --> 00:10:21.285
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's a minute ago.

00:10:21.610 --> 00:10:27.735
<v Riley Bowman>That's a minute. We're talking the better part of a millennium. Of millennium.

00:10:29.284 --> 00:10:36.026
<v Riley Bowman>The statute of Northampton. Okay. So this was a law that was put in place in

00:10:36.026 --> 00:10:43.710
<v Riley Bowman>1328 forbidding people from going about armed to terrify the king's subjects.

00:10:45.134 --> 00:10:48.974
<v Riley Bowman>And the reason why this statute was put into place was to make a distinction.

00:10:48.974 --> 00:10:55.224
<v Riley Bowman>So essentially there was this presumption already that there was a context that

00:10:55.224 --> 00:10:57.944
<v Riley Bowman>people were carrying arms. Yes.

00:10:59.154 --> 00:11:04.924
<v Riley Bowman>And that that was permissible. but that this statute was needed to put in a

00:11:04.924 --> 00:11:13.757
<v Riley Bowman>clarification that what is illegal is to go about carrying weapons for the purpose of terrifying,

00:11:14.511 --> 00:11:16.961
<v Riley Bowman>the king's subjects, the public, in other words.

00:11:18.174 --> 00:11:23.514
<v Riley Bowman>And so that law was put into place in 1328 to make that distinction,

00:11:23.514 --> 00:11:29.794
<v Riley Bowman>to say, hey, you're packing around your knife or your bow and arrow or whatever.

00:11:30.091 --> 00:11:35.536
<v Riley Bowman>That's fine as long as you are not terrifying the king's subjects.

00:11:35.994 --> 00:11:41.811
<v Jacob Paulsen>Unless you're willing to forfeit your armor and your body to the prison of the king's pleasure yeah

00:11:42.854 --> 00:11:46.784
<v Jacob Paulsen>so that was that was apparently the consequence of breaking this one yeah yeah

00:11:46.784 --> 00:11:51.999
<v Jacob Paulsen>and this is a package of laws this whole writing while armed is one kind of section of it

00:11:52.504 --> 00:11:55.284
<v Jacob Paulsen>but you know it would suggest that there's some issue with this you know people

00:11:55.284 --> 00:11:59.974
<v Jacob Paulsen>running around armed terrifying the public or something so we You have to say,

00:11:59.974 --> 00:12:02.320
<v Jacob Paulsen>you can't do that anymore. You got to stop scaring people.

00:12:04.357 --> 00:12:12.217
<v Riley Bowman>And so that kind of is, as I mentioned, the first recognition as far as in some kind of law or statute,

00:12:14.539 --> 00:12:22.055
<v Riley Bowman>an acknowledgment that there was this inherent right of the people to bear arms.

00:12:22.310 --> 00:12:25.249
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right, right, right. Because, yeah, it's assumed that people just have arms

00:12:25.249 --> 00:12:28.637
<v Jacob Paulsen>and that's just stop intimidating people riding around with them.

00:12:28.881 --> 00:12:32.689
<v Riley Bowman>Right. So as long as you're just going about your business, doing your thing,

00:12:32.689 --> 00:12:34.976
<v Riley Bowman>not bothering anybody, no issue.

00:12:35.191 --> 00:12:36.561
<v Jacob Paulsen>Or if they're in your home, that's fine.

00:12:36.753 --> 00:12:37.031
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:12:37.223 --> 00:12:38.559
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. If you're hunting, that's

00:12:38.559 --> 00:12:42.790
<v Jacob Paulsen>probably fine. There's a presumed assumption that you can have them.

00:12:43.080 --> 00:12:46.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>We just need you to stop riding around intimidating people with them.

00:12:47.144 --> 00:12:52.479
<v Riley Bowman>So the key here is that the statute of Northampton of 1328 established that

00:12:52.479 --> 00:12:58.639
<v Riley Bowman>bearing arms lawfully or legally was never disputed, but only in the manner

00:12:58.639 --> 00:13:01.105
<v Riley Bowman>of doing so menacingly. All right.

00:13:01.877 --> 00:13:10.119
<v Riley Bowman>So the Bruin case dealt with this by looking at how the statute established

00:13:10.119 --> 00:13:11.147
<v Riley Bowman>that historical precedent,

00:13:12.119 --> 00:13:17.404
<v Riley Bowman>that acknowledgement that, hey, this exists, the bearing of arms exists,

00:13:17.746 --> 00:13:20.022
<v Riley Bowman>essentially is a right, a recognized right.

00:13:20.382 --> 00:13:26.469
<v Riley Bowman>There can be limitations. In this case, the limitation in England was don't

00:13:26.469 --> 00:13:30.715
<v Riley Bowman>do it menacingly. Don't menace the public. Don't do it to intimidate people.

00:13:31.556 --> 00:13:37.119
<v Riley Bowman>You may have your arms for lawful purposes, but as soon as you start creating

00:13:37.119 --> 00:13:40.270
<v Riley Bowman>problems for other people, then we got a problem. All right.

00:13:40.618 --> 00:13:45.509
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, you just set up the critical point here, so I'll just reiterate that this

00:13:45.509 --> 00:13:49.529
<v Jacob Paulsen>established that there's a right, but there are circumstances in which that

00:13:49.529 --> 00:13:50.307
<v Jacob Paulsen>right could be restricted.

00:13:52.169 --> 00:13:55.939
<v Riley Bowman>We see that across the board with almost all the other rights,

00:13:57.599 --> 00:14:00.232
<v Riley Bowman>including in the Bill of Rights, so the freedom of speech, for instance,

00:14:01.439 --> 00:14:05.044
<v Riley Bowman>and right to assemble and worship peaceably.

00:14:06.019 --> 00:14:10.431
<v Riley Bowman>All those things can be done, but there are times and places and instances where,

00:14:12.334 --> 00:14:16.909
<v Riley Bowman>we don't want to be infringing upon other people's rights or causing problems

00:14:16.909 --> 00:14:19.539
<v Riley Bowman>like running into movie theaters and yelling fire.

00:14:19.999 --> 00:14:23.834
<v Riley Bowman>That causes a problem. right okay so,

00:14:24.966 --> 00:14:30.196
<v Riley Bowman>that's what's interesting is realizing that there was a standard created 700

00:14:30.556 --> 00:14:34.765
<v Riley Bowman>ish years ago it's just under 700 years 698 years to be precise,

00:14:35.310 --> 00:14:42.209
<v Riley Bowman>that acknowledged the bearing and keeping of arms but with some recognized limitations

00:14:42.209 --> 00:14:43.902
<v Riley Bowman>such as don't terrify people,

00:14:44.784 --> 00:14:48.156
<v Riley Bowman>now it wouldn't surprise me at all jacob knowing how uh,

00:14:49.975 --> 00:14:55.663
<v Riley Bowman>kings work kings and queens uh that things like this could also be used whenever

00:14:55.663 --> 00:15:01.440
<v Riley Bowman>it was convenient or if they could say sure hey you're terrifying people,

00:15:01.945 --> 00:15:06.716
<v Riley Bowman>like whether you actually are not you know if the king says so it gives them a way to,

00:15:07.262 --> 00:15:09.583
<v Riley Bowman>hey i take i'm taking your weapons from you kind of it's.

00:15:09.583 --> 00:15:11.557
<v Jacob Paulsen>Not exactly a republic

00:15:12.050 --> 00:15:17.396
<v Riley Bowman>And so actually that's kind of a segue into the next kind of key moment in history,

00:15:17.901 --> 00:15:19.817
<v Riley Bowman>uh which is referred to as the

00:15:20.212 --> 00:15:25.024
<v Riley Bowman>stewart era selective disarmament i don't know where this came from but,

00:15:25.726 --> 00:15:29.943
<v Riley Bowman>what we're talking about here is really under the kings charles ii and james

00:15:29.943 --> 00:15:33.803
<v Riley Bowman>ii okay this is the 1660s to 1680s.

00:15:33.803 --> 00:15:37.693
<v Jacob Paulsen>And for some context on this timeline this is when like the british empire is being

00:15:37.693 --> 00:15:40.273
<v Riley Bowman>Born oh yeah i mean and it's going having.

00:15:40.273 --> 00:15:44.353
<v Jacob Paulsen>This massive expansion yeah I mean, really the beginning of the British Empire,

00:15:44.353 --> 00:15:46.607
<v Jacob Paulsen>as we think of it as like the 1500s.

00:15:47.135 --> 00:15:51.611
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so now we're in the mid 1600s and we are just exploding.

00:15:51.837 --> 00:15:57.027
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. We are claiming territories and colonies. And I mean, it's hot right now.

00:15:57.230 --> 00:15:57.503
<v Riley Bowman>Right.

00:16:01.578 --> 00:16:06.599
<v Riley Bowman>Uh what's the word i'm looking for kingdom you know is going worldwide yeah

00:16:06.774 --> 00:16:11.207
<v Riley Bowman>they're colonizing all over the place wherever they can uh staking claims upon

00:16:11.207 --> 00:16:13.317
<v Riley Bowman>lands and yes oceans and sea and.

00:16:13.427 --> 00:16:17.237
<v Jacob Paulsen>Establishing a lot more standardization because of that right we need to have

00:16:17.237 --> 00:16:23.437
<v Jacob Paulsen>more clarity of law of the magistrate of uh what's the word i'm looking for

00:16:23.437 --> 00:16:27.457
<v Jacob Paulsen>sovereignty so you know those those things become relevant at this time

00:16:27.457 --> 00:16:34.740
<v Riley Bowman>Period you also have of course this is in that era too or shortly after uh where

00:16:34.920 --> 00:16:40.047
<v Riley Bowman>you've got essentially the church which is you know the catholic church of course

00:16:40.047 --> 00:16:41.787
<v Riley Bowman>later becomes the church of england,

00:16:43.691 --> 00:16:47.477
<v Riley Bowman>uh and the protestants protestant church you know and that course becomes a

00:16:47.477 --> 00:16:48.597
<v Riley Bowman>and we're not going to go into that

00:16:48.597 --> 00:16:52.227
<v Riley Bowman>that's not part of the the discussion necessarily as far as that history.

00:16:52.227 --> 00:16:59.759
<v Riley Bowman>However, there is an important tie-in here which has to do with the fact that during this time,

00:17:02.679 --> 00:17:08.397
<v Riley Bowman>the king started to create, or in parliament, started to create laws that specifically

00:17:08.397 --> 00:17:11.786
<v Riley Bowman>targeted certain people and classes of people.

00:17:12.105 --> 00:17:17.127
<v Jacob Paulsen>Specifically Protestants. Yeah, exactly. It's like banning glocks in California

00:17:17.127 --> 00:17:18.375
<v Jacob Paulsen>without using the word glock.

00:17:18.781 --> 00:17:24.587
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's kind of what happened here is that these laws were written or established

00:17:24.587 --> 00:17:27.616
<v Jacob Paulsen>in order to prevent Protestants from having access to guns.

00:17:27.854 --> 00:17:28.046
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:17:29.287 --> 00:17:32.521
<v Jacob Paulsen>And simultaneously to ensure that Catholics did have access to guns.

00:17:34.347 --> 00:17:37.827
<v Jacob Paulsen>Church and state were one and the same. It's really the American experiment

00:17:37.827 --> 00:17:42.847
<v Jacob Paulsen>was the first government on the planet in a very, very, very,

00:17:43.587 --> 00:17:46.471
<v Jacob Paulsen>in a millennia to decide to separate church and state.

00:17:46.877 --> 00:17:50.967
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. So this is at a time when church and state is married and that church

00:17:50.967 --> 00:17:52.641
<v Jacob Paulsen>specifically is the Catholic church.

00:17:53.088 --> 00:17:56.844
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the idea that all these Protestants are popping up and they're gaining

00:17:57.117 --> 00:18:01.105
<v Jacob Paulsen>some momentum and some popularity, well, them being armed is seen as a threat.

00:18:03.304 --> 00:18:05.866
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, we have a comment, by the way, from Brian Shuler on YouTube saying,

00:18:05.866 --> 00:18:09.746
<v Riley Bowman>I think the Three Musketeers had something to do with the passage of this law.

00:18:11.778 --> 00:18:17.160
<v Riley Bowman>Anyway, that's fun. Yeah, so this is where we start to see...

00:18:19.026 --> 00:18:20.936
<v Jacob Paulsen>Alexander DeMauw is a genius.

00:18:20.936 --> 00:18:21.264
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:18:21.866 --> 00:18:28.259
<v Jacob Paulsen>And, you know, Three Musketeers... Have you read the book? Because the book is terrible. Yeah.

00:18:29.166 --> 00:18:33.036
<v Riley Bowman>I had tried to read it when I was like 13, and I don't think I actually got all the way through it.

00:18:33.175 --> 00:18:37.106
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, it's a rough read by our modern context. Obviously, at the time,

00:18:37.606 --> 00:18:42.516
<v Jacob Paulsen>highly successful book, along with his others as well, The Man and the Iron Mask and others.

00:18:42.986 --> 00:18:44.986
<v Jacob Paulsen>But The Three Musketeers is among

00:18:47.586 --> 00:18:51.266
<v Jacob Paulsen>the most adapted book to television of any book in history.

00:18:51.866 --> 00:18:55.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think there's like three books that have been adapted to television more than The Three Musketeers.

00:18:55.461 --> 00:19:00.656
<v Jacob Paulsen>One of them is like Dracula. Dracula is the most adapted book to screen of all times.

00:19:01.005 --> 00:19:03.766
<v Jacob Paulsen>But The Three Musketeers is pretty high up there. So anyway,

00:19:05.026 --> 00:19:07.476
<v Jacob Paulsen>I guess I just had to get my little three musketeers comment out.

00:19:07.609 --> 00:19:11.505
<v Riley Bowman>That's a great story. I mean, people love it.

00:19:13.467 --> 00:19:20.427
<v Riley Bowman>Now, so back in 1662, there was a law passed called the Militia Act of 1662,

00:19:21.141 --> 00:19:26.706
<v Riley Bowman>which allowed royal officers to confiscate arms from anyone judged dangerous to the peace.

00:19:26.706 --> 00:19:27.968
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, at their own discretion.

00:19:28.217 --> 00:19:32.286
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. So again, so this is not all that different than probably,

00:19:32.286 --> 00:19:35.293
<v Riley Bowman>you know, the statute of Northampton from the 1300s,

00:19:35.996 --> 00:19:41.760
<v Riley Bowman>but was probably for them at that time, a more modern interpretation or variation of that,

00:19:42.317 --> 00:19:47.956
<v Riley Bowman>and giving them the opportunity or need or justification, I guess,

00:19:48.336 --> 00:19:52.146
<v Riley Bowman>word I'm looking for to confiscate weapons, to take weapons from those they

00:19:52.146 --> 00:19:54.380
<v Riley Bowman>deemed dangerous to the peace.

00:19:54.816 --> 00:19:57.213
<v Riley Bowman>The challenge is that this could then be,

00:19:58.357 --> 00:20:01.724
<v Riley Bowman>interpreted to be, you know, well, what's dangerous to the peace?

00:20:01.724 --> 00:20:02.854
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those Protestants, apparently.

00:20:02.854 --> 00:20:04.544
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly, right?

00:20:04.544 --> 00:20:08.294
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those people who are a threat to the Catholic Church, those are the ones that

00:20:08.294 --> 00:20:10.514
<v Jacob Paulsen>are, you know, that's dangerous, so take away their guns.

00:20:10.514 --> 00:20:13.152
<v Riley Bowman>So that's exactly what started happening with King James II,

00:20:13.553 --> 00:20:19.991
<v Riley Bowman>was using this selectively against Protestants that he didn't like or disagreed with.

00:20:20.234 --> 00:20:24.304
<v Riley Bowman>Well, really, he disagreed with all of them because they were not part of,

00:20:24.644 --> 00:20:26.484
<v Riley Bowman>you know, the national religion.

00:20:26.804 --> 00:20:32.524
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is important because, for all, we will see this repeated with African Americans

00:20:32.524 --> 00:20:36.697
<v Jacob Paulsen>in the United States in the early days of the U.S. Constitution.

00:20:38.056 --> 00:20:41.894
<v Jacob Paulsen>But more importantly, it's because what happens today under Bruin,

00:20:41.894 --> 00:20:47.454
<v Jacob Paulsen>and we're going to hit there eventually, is that gun grabbers who are trying

00:20:47.454 --> 00:20:52.924
<v Jacob Paulsen>to justify their anti-gun laws are looking for historical analogs to justify them.

00:20:53.671 --> 00:20:57.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so they look back at things like this, like, well, this law existed that

00:20:57.014 --> 00:21:00.674
<v Jacob Paulsen>was designed, you know, to allow to remove guns from people,

00:21:00.674 --> 00:21:04.222
<v Jacob Paulsen>right? So does that make red flag laws, you know, constitutional?

00:21:04.751 --> 00:21:09.564
<v Jacob Paulsen>But, you know, we'll see that the Supreme Court doesn't put up with historical

00:21:09.564 --> 00:21:13.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>analogs if those historical analogs were like evil and morally corrupt.

00:21:14.712 --> 00:21:19.588
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so that's come up many times in federal district courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.

00:21:19.884 --> 00:21:22.494
<v Jacob Paulsen>Is it basically said, well, I guess that's a historical analog,

00:21:22.494 --> 00:21:23.808
<v Jacob Paulsen>but that doesn't make it okay.

00:21:27.205 --> 00:21:32.568
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, so that's kind of how these laws started to be used was with the intent

00:21:32.568 --> 00:21:35.855
<v Riley Bowman>of selectively going after certain people or groups of people.

00:21:36.648 --> 00:21:42.281
<v Riley Bowman>So to your point, I mean, this was used as gun control in the 1600s.

00:21:42.676 --> 00:21:45.816
<v Riley Bowman>But this is what came out of it, though. And that's what this sets us up for,

00:21:46.066 --> 00:21:55.557
<v Riley Bowman>is that the English Bill of Rights passed in 1689 was a direct response to those abuses.

00:21:57.328 --> 00:21:58.092
<v Jacob Paulsen>Which is a huge win

00:21:58.313 --> 00:22:03.428
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah it was not only in terms of what we're talking about here today with regards

00:22:03.428 --> 00:22:04.890
<v Riley Bowman>to second amendment type issues,

00:22:05.889 --> 00:22:11.868
<v Riley Bowman>but was a huge win for religious freedom as well in England at that time too

00:22:11.868 --> 00:22:15.949
<v Riley Bowman>because it became people basically started having enough of,

00:22:17.655 --> 00:22:24.958
<v Riley Bowman>Protestants being the target of the crown and hey we need to put a stop to this,

00:22:24.958 --> 00:22:26.418
<v Riley Bowman>or at least try to put a stop to it.

00:22:26.418 --> 00:22:33.218
<v Riley Bowman>We know there were still a lot of challenges for the Protestant churches even

00:22:33.218 --> 00:22:35.748
<v Riley Bowman>after that time, but this was a start.

00:22:36.108 --> 00:22:40.510
<v Riley Bowman>The English Bill of Rights passed by Parliament in 1689,

00:22:41.308 --> 00:22:44.724
<v Riley Bowman>and in those Bill of Rights it said this, that subjects, the people,

00:22:45.008 --> 00:22:51.388
<v Riley Bowman>may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.

00:22:52.670 --> 00:22:57.789
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. In fact, I see this almost echoing the National Firearm Act,

00:22:58.395 --> 00:23:04.070
<v Jacob Paulsen>excuse me, the Gun Control Act of 68 and the Fire and Motor Protection Act of 1986 in America.

00:23:04.360 --> 00:23:08.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sort of like, you know, we went one step too far in controlling guns and,

00:23:08.355 --> 00:23:10.484
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, the pendulum had to swing back and kind of correct it.

00:23:11.001 --> 00:23:15.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>But also a piece of context I think here is relevant is think that like the Mayflower, right?

00:23:15.645 --> 00:23:20.965
<v Jacob Paulsen>The original Puritans that left England and became the first real true white

00:23:20.965 --> 00:23:24.785
<v Jacob Paulsen>settlers of the United States, in my opinion, they left in 1620,

00:23:24.785 --> 00:23:26.930
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think, or they landed here in 1620.

00:23:27.185 --> 00:23:27.875
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, about then.

00:23:27.875 --> 00:23:30.465
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, so you got to put this in context of what's going on in England at the

00:23:30.465 --> 00:23:35.243
<v Jacob Paulsen>time, right? Like there's this huge rise of resistance against the Catholic Church.

00:23:35.742 --> 00:23:41.344
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the government's basically fighting against that. The king is fighting against that.

00:23:41.762 --> 00:23:44.525
<v Jacob Paulsen>And now it's starting to swing back out and say, wait a minute,

00:23:46.295 --> 00:23:49.485
<v Jacob Paulsen>we got to respect the rights of people, including their faith,

00:23:49.485 --> 00:23:50.829
<v Jacob Paulsen>but certainly their right to bear arms.

00:23:51.224 --> 00:23:55.475
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so anyway, I just think some of that historical context matters.

00:23:55.835 --> 00:24:00.665
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Isn't it remarkable when we look at this in the modern era,

00:24:00.665 --> 00:24:03.854
<v Riley Bowman>and I mean looking at it from the perspective of—,

00:24:04.841 --> 00:24:11.096
<v Riley Bowman>brits right yeah where i mean it they they put in their their own version of

00:24:11.096 --> 00:24:15.036
<v Riley Bowman>their bill of rights the english bill of rights the phrase that says that people

00:24:15.036 --> 00:24:19.737
<v Riley Bowman>may have arms for their defense there's another part there i'm going to come back to in a moment,

00:24:20.300 --> 00:24:25.518
<v Riley Bowman>but acknowledge that people may have arms for their defense and then today contrast that with where,

00:24:26.395 --> 00:24:31.926
<v Riley Bowman>the uk is today where you're not allowed to have weapon for defense you can't.

00:24:31.926 --> 00:24:32.716
<v Jacob Paulsen>Even have a kitchen knife

00:24:33.187 --> 00:24:36.736
<v Riley Bowman>Right so Like you're told that basically, I remember we covered this in the

00:24:36.736 --> 00:24:41.246
<v Riley Bowman>podcast several years ago, where like the only suitable tool at your disposal

00:24:41.246 --> 00:24:45.093
<v Riley Bowman>was like a whistle or a rape alarm or something to that effect.

00:24:45.946 --> 00:24:52.712
<v Riley Bowman>So pretty sad to see how far they've really swung against their old Bill of Rights.

00:24:53.339 --> 00:24:57.624
<v Jacob Paulsen>Another piece of context that's relevant here is 1689 is this English Bill of Rights.

00:24:57.983 --> 00:25:04.746
<v Jacob Paulsen>So fast forward to 1773, 1774, 1775 in America, the English Bill of Rights is less than 100 years old.

00:25:05.576 --> 00:25:10.185
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the colonists are feeling like, hey, we're being abused by the king.

00:25:11.271 --> 00:25:13.715
<v Jacob Paulsen>This ain't cool. We've got to deal with some of these things,

00:25:13.976 --> 00:25:18.566
<v Jacob Paulsen>the Tax Act and the Stamp Act and the Coercion Act, et cetera.

00:25:18.566 --> 00:25:23.560
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so I just wanted to put that in context, right, that we're talking about a timeline.

00:25:23.845 --> 00:25:29.636
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact, 1689 to 1789 basically is 100 years from the English Bill of Rights

00:25:29.636 --> 00:25:34.027
<v Jacob Paulsen>being written to the U.S. Constitution being affected.

00:25:35.206 --> 00:25:36.796
<v Riley Bowman>That's pretty spot on.

00:25:36.796 --> 00:25:40.186
<v Jacob Paulsen>So context, right? And the U.S. Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the

00:25:40.186 --> 00:25:42.461
<v Jacob Paulsen>U.S. Constitution, 1791.

00:25:42.763 --> 00:25:46.049
<v Jacob Paulsen>So 103 years after the English Bill of Rights.

00:25:46.270 --> 00:25:49.956
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway, I just think to us, this is a long time ago, but to the American

00:25:49.956 --> 00:25:52.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>founding fathers, the English Bill of Rights was not yet 100 years old.

00:25:53.182 --> 00:25:58.676
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. I appreciate you pointing that out it's a relatively new thing at that

00:25:58.676 --> 00:26:02.365
<v Riley Bowman>time and again this is all context this is the world that,

00:26:04.085 --> 00:26:10.133
<v Riley Bowman>Our colonials, you know, those that became our founding fathers grew up within this framework.

00:26:11.571 --> 00:26:17.801
<v Riley Bowman>And by the way, it was Justice Scalia who wrote the majority opinion on the

00:26:17.801 --> 00:26:20.786
<v Riley Bowman>Heller decision, the famous Heller decision of 2008.

00:26:21.891 --> 00:26:23.624
<v Riley Bowman>And he noted in that.

00:26:24.744 --> 00:26:28.664
<v Riley Bowman>The English Bill of Rights, specifically this phrase that people may have arms

00:26:28.664 --> 00:26:32.261
<v Riley Bowman>for their defense suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law,

00:26:33.244 --> 00:26:37.776
<v Riley Bowman>while that's not perfect, and while we've certainly, in our own Bill of Rights,

00:26:38.176 --> 00:26:42.984
<v Riley Bowman>went well beyond that as far as not having something like suitable to their conditions,

00:26:43.737 --> 00:26:48.445
<v Riley Bowman>or even as allowed by law in our Bill of Rights with respect to the Second Amendment.

00:26:49.344 --> 00:26:54.684
<v Riley Bowman>But he noted that this part of the Bill of Rights acknowledged or creates,

00:26:55.126 --> 00:26:59.434
<v Riley Bowman>this was evidence that the right predates, meaning the right to bear arms,

00:26:59.434 --> 00:27:05.035
<v Riley Bowman>predates and is independent to our own Constitution and Bill of Rights.

00:27:05.290 --> 00:27:09.594
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the specific key here is this idea for their defense. Because a common thing

00:27:09.594 --> 00:27:12.581
<v Jacob Paulsen>you hear from people today is, oh, the Second Amendment, it's all about militia.

00:27:13.040 --> 00:27:15.902
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was all about forming, creating, and standing up of militia.

00:27:16.724 --> 00:27:21.695
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it's not about an individual's right to have guns for their own personal

00:27:22.026 --> 00:27:23.849
<v Jacob Paulsen>satisfaction or self-defense.

00:27:24.197 --> 00:27:27.144
<v Jacob Paulsen>And here it's like in 1689 it was.

00:27:27.144 --> 00:27:32.608
<v Jacob Paulsen>In 1689, the English Bill of Rights set forth that this was for the personal

00:27:32.870 --> 00:27:35.514
<v Jacob Paulsen>defense, for one's personal ability

00:27:35.514 --> 00:27:39.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>to defend themselves with whatever arm would be appropriate for that

00:27:41.004 --> 00:27:42.529
<v Jacob Paulsen>within the scope of what's allowed by law.

00:27:42.837 --> 00:27:46.904
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is setting forth that it's not just, hey, Americans can,

00:27:46.904 --> 00:27:53.412
<v Jacob Paulsen>or this time, the English people could own guns, but they can own guns for self-defense.

00:27:55.009 --> 00:28:00.584
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, that's such a valid point. And understand, I mean, we're going to talk

00:28:00.584 --> 00:28:01.696
<v Riley Bowman>some more about Heller, of course.

00:28:02.304 --> 00:28:07.794
<v Riley Bowman>We're going to give its own space on this podcast today. But how significant

00:28:07.794 --> 00:28:10.994
<v Riley Bowman>that was, I think, is important to recognize that, you know,

00:28:10.994 --> 00:28:17.230
<v Riley Bowman>as far as that Heller decision for the first time officially in our nation's history.

00:28:18.600 --> 00:28:21.752
<v Riley Bowman>Very clearly pointed out the second amendment,

00:28:23.116 --> 00:28:27.932
<v Riley Bowman>is about an individual right protecting an individual right that's right and

00:28:27.932 --> 00:28:32.172
<v Riley Bowman>that's why this is so key understanding this history and the english bill of

00:28:32.172 --> 00:28:34.715
<v Riley Bowman>rights and how it was about,

00:28:35.435 --> 00:28:40.842
<v Riley Bowman>people subjects to the king people we're not talking about militias it militias

00:28:40.842 --> 00:28:47.587
<v Riley Bowman>weren't part of this this verbiage here it was about people having arms for their defense.

00:28:47.587 --> 00:28:50.532
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was about all people. In fact, that was one of the points,

00:28:50.532 --> 00:28:52.964
<v Jacob Paulsen>right? It's like, it's not about a select group of citizens.

00:28:53.260 --> 00:28:57.649
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's about all of the subjects of the king. It's about all of them having this right.

00:28:58.276 --> 00:29:02.072
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And I understand the English Bill of Rights wasn't perfect,

00:29:02.363 --> 00:29:07.175
<v Riley Bowman>and there was still a lot of class-based related issues and problems and challenges,

00:29:07.982 --> 00:29:11.598
<v Riley Bowman>but this was a step in the right direction, and this again,

00:29:12.422 --> 00:29:19.191
<v Riley Bowman>is part of that framework that established our own Bill of Rights here in our country,

00:29:19.958 --> 00:29:26.292
<v Riley Bowman>and again was used as that evidence for later rulings super important rulings

00:29:26.292 --> 00:29:27.934
<v Riley Bowman>like the Heller decision that,

00:29:28.682 --> 00:29:36.154
<v Riley Bowman>on record established no this is about an individual right super super key so this,

00:29:37.059 --> 00:29:42.696
<v Riley Bowman>is a recognition of where it all started for America okay,

00:29:43.908 --> 00:29:47.774
<v Riley Bowman>Let's now, let's turn our attention now a little more to America,

00:29:48.000 --> 00:29:50.491
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob. Let's talk about the colonies a little bit.

00:29:52.528 --> 00:29:57.132
<v Riley Bowman>Our own history, of course, is not without stains. Yeah.

00:29:58.017 --> 00:30:01.706
<v Riley Bowman>We're going to talk quite a bit more about that throughout this episode even.

00:30:02.797 --> 00:30:07.203
<v Riley Bowman>But we had settlement here of the American colonies.

00:30:08.341 --> 00:30:11.857
<v Riley Bowman>American people here are doing their thing. They're creating their lives.

00:30:11.857 --> 00:30:14.937
<v Riley Bowman>They're creating their own version of a country.

00:30:15.477 --> 00:30:21.627
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, they recognize themselves as subjects to the king, as part of that great

00:30:21.627 --> 00:30:24.189
<v Riley Bowman>kingdom, the United Kingdom.

00:30:25.857 --> 00:30:32.983
<v Riley Bowman>But they were very much independent and, like I said, doing their own thing here. Right.

00:30:33.897 --> 00:30:40.657
<v Riley Bowman>And so what's interesting is that by the time you arrive to that critical period

00:30:40.657 --> 00:30:45.631
<v Riley Bowman>of history, you know, the late 1700s, 1760s, 1770s,

00:30:46.641 --> 00:30:52.417
<v Riley Bowman>the American colonialists are some of the most armed people in all of the world.

00:30:53.311 --> 00:30:56.527
<v Jacob Paulsen>Big time. I mean, and for lots of reasons that are very practical.

00:30:57.073 --> 00:31:00.654
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. For one, you know, there's a massive concern about the natives.

00:31:01.280 --> 00:31:05.826
<v Jacob Paulsen>For better or for worse, the natives are seen as enemies of the people,

00:31:06.064 --> 00:31:12.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>savages that are dangerous, that will steal your wife and baby and burn your house down, right?

00:31:12.339 --> 00:31:17.682
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's an issue. Then we have the reality of just food procurement. This is the wilderness.

00:31:18.102 --> 00:31:21.702
<v Jacob Paulsen>At least then it was the wilderness. I don't think you'd feel that way if you

00:31:21.702 --> 00:31:23.165
<v Jacob Paulsen>were hanging out in New York City today.

00:31:23.612 --> 00:31:28.742
<v Jacob Paulsen>But at the time, Long Island was the wilderness. Right. So even as Manhattan

00:31:28.742 --> 00:31:32.142
<v Jacob Paulsen>became populated. So you've got to think of it like, well, this is our primary

00:31:32.142 --> 00:31:34.183
<v Jacob Paulsen>means of getting food is the gun.

00:31:34.601 --> 00:31:39.672
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then you go beyond that, and certainly the king is not going to pop over

00:31:39.672 --> 00:31:43.545
<v Jacob Paulsen>here on the weekend to help protect us from any potential threat.

00:31:44.342 --> 00:31:48.632
<v Jacob Paulsen>Other colonists from France or from wherever they might be coming.

00:31:48.632 --> 00:31:53.732
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so this idea of standing up a militia becomes really critical for each community,

00:31:53.732 --> 00:31:55.753
<v Jacob Paulsen>for each group to have their own militia.

00:31:56.055 --> 00:31:58.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we're talking about – and this is where this one gets a little bit harder

00:31:58.822 --> 00:32:00.772
<v Jacob Paulsen>because some of these other ones we've talked about have been kind of,

00:32:00.772 --> 00:32:02.481
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, the country of England did this.

00:32:02.847 --> 00:32:06.842
<v Jacob Paulsen>And now this kind of section of the podcast, we're really suggesting that what

00:32:06.842 --> 00:32:14.062
<v Jacob Paulsen>you see is this trend of popular gun-related things across various colonies

00:32:14.062 --> 00:32:17.818
<v Jacob Paulsen>in the Americas that served kind of two core patterns.

00:32:18.172 --> 00:32:22.700
<v Jacob Paulsen>The first pattern is one of almost, in many cases, literally,

00:32:22.967 --> 00:32:26.241
<v Jacob Paulsen>requiring that people owned a gun.

00:32:26.566 --> 00:32:30.492
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know, that, hey, part of you being part of this colony, this community,

00:32:30.492 --> 00:32:32.762
<v Jacob Paulsen>this society, is that you need to have a gun.

00:32:33.322 --> 00:32:37.973
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you need to be capable of deploying that gun in sometimes a matter of minutes

00:32:38.297 --> 00:32:42.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>and assembling in a common area to be part of a community militia.

00:32:43.155 --> 00:32:47.262
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then the other pattern that's common here is, we start to refer to the stain

00:32:47.262 --> 00:32:50.992
<v Jacob Paulsen>that I said, and that is this idea that we can't have slaves having guns.

00:32:52.262 --> 00:32:59.692
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, hey, in our colony, I mean, as early as 1600s, you see slave codes being

00:32:59.692 --> 00:33:00.890
<v Jacob Paulsen>established in South Carolina.

00:33:01.552 --> 00:33:05.163
<v Jacob Paulsen>So these slave codes are established, and among these various slave codes,

00:33:05.163 --> 00:33:06.313
<v Jacob Paulsen>one of them is all about guns.

00:33:08.187 --> 00:33:09.952
<v Jacob Paulsen>No touchy of the guns for the slaves.

00:33:10.428 --> 00:33:13.883
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. Yeah, and so that's exactly where I was going with this discussion.

00:33:13.883 --> 00:33:19.600
<v Riley Bowman>It was to point out, here in the colonies, the colonies were really on their own.

00:33:19.826 --> 00:33:20.001
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep.

00:33:20.175 --> 00:33:24.373
<v Riley Bowman>Right? There were some of the king's troops here. Yes, sir.

00:33:26.015 --> 00:33:31.970
<v Riley Bowman>The colonies, like already with 13 colonies, was already significantly larger

00:33:32.325 --> 00:33:34.397
<v Riley Bowman>than all of England. Yes. Right?

00:33:34.821 --> 00:33:37.281
<v Jacob Paulsen>Way bigger. Not even close.

00:33:38.061 --> 00:33:43.672
<v Riley Bowman>And on top of that, the king has gone throughout the world establishing his kingdom.

00:33:43.887 --> 00:33:48.746
<v Riley Bowman>Like England is fighting wars all over the world throughout this part of history,

00:33:49.361 --> 00:33:51.944
<v Riley Bowman>and claiming territories and islands. Oh, yeah.

00:33:52.117 --> 00:34:00.061
<v Riley Bowman>You know, and so, you know, the English Empire has just become so massive. That's strong.

00:34:00.741 --> 00:34:04.311
<v Riley Bowman>And very strong. I mean, it is the dominant force in the world at that time.

00:34:04.311 --> 00:34:07.561
<v Jacob Paulsen>Largest army, largest military, or largest navy on the planet.

00:34:07.561 --> 00:34:10.339
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, and probably up to that point in history, right?

00:34:10.699 --> 00:34:18.411
<v Riley Bowman>And so it is the dominant force in the world. But that huge kingdom requires

00:34:18.411 --> 00:34:20.869
<v Riley Bowman>a huge force to just try to maintain.

00:34:21.044 --> 00:34:22.797
<v Riley Bowman>And it can't be everywhere all at once.

00:34:23.030 --> 00:34:29.061
<v Riley Bowman>And if there's a conflict going on somewhere in the Caribbean or in Africa or

00:34:29.061 --> 00:34:32.573
<v Riley Bowman>in India or whatever, troops are getting sent there.

00:34:32.904 --> 00:34:37.494
<v Riley Bowman>So the point is, this is where the colonies are like, yeah, we are on our own

00:34:37.708 --> 00:34:40.891
<v Riley Bowman>to a large extent to defend our communities.

00:34:40.891 --> 00:34:47.561
<v Jacob Paulsen>There was a local government structure. The king would establish governors that

00:34:47.561 --> 00:34:51.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>would be sent to rule over a colony or to establish

00:34:52.541 --> 00:34:56.418
<v Jacob Paulsen>a system of grievances and addressing those kinds of things.

00:34:57.521 --> 00:35:01.061
<v Jacob Paulsen>So yeah, these colonies are established as colonies and they are ruled by a

00:35:01.061 --> 00:35:04.541
<v Jacob Paulsen>governor appointed by the king or by parliament, depending on how you want to

00:35:04.541 --> 00:35:07.561
<v Jacob Paulsen>think of it, to kind of manage that colony.

00:35:07.561 --> 00:35:10.621
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's where you start to see some of these trends where these governors

00:35:10.621 --> 00:35:13.908
<v Jacob Paulsen>are like, hey, are you having this issue? Yeah, me too. Cool. Let's do this.

00:35:15.039 --> 00:35:19.498
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. And so the colonies have their own form of government.

00:35:20.635 --> 00:35:25.924
<v Riley Bowman>Each colony had a colonial government of some sort managed by a governor.

00:35:27.447 --> 00:35:33.227
<v Riley Bowman>And as you already covered, there were laws in some colonies requiring the owning

00:35:33.227 --> 00:35:38.490
<v Riley Bowman>and bearing of firearms and weapons, requiring people to be a part of militia.

00:35:39.135 --> 00:35:42.507
<v Riley Bowman>Because, again, at any time, they could be called upon because they're attacked

00:35:42.507 --> 00:35:49.517
<v Riley Bowman>by a tribe of Indians. Later in the mid-1700s, 1750s, 60s, you start having

00:35:49.517 --> 00:35:50.948
<v Riley Bowman>more conflicts with the French.

00:35:52.776 --> 00:35:53.496
<v Riley Bowman>And so...

00:35:54.442 --> 00:35:58.720
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And then, of course, on the flip side, where you've got laws that were

00:35:58.720 --> 00:36:03.980
<v Riley Bowman>passed to keep certain people, in this case, specifically black people,

00:36:04.201 --> 00:36:06.581
<v Riley Bowman>from being able to possess their own arms.

00:36:07.039 --> 00:36:08.932
<v Riley Bowman>Let's fast forward now, too.

00:36:09.431 --> 00:36:14.951
<v Riley Bowman>We're jumping ahead, jumping around a little bit, but let's go now to 1774.

00:36:16.670 --> 00:36:21.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah so some historical context here this is a rough time basically the British

00:36:21.720 --> 00:36:23.890
<v Jacob Paulsen>have just crushed France again

00:36:25.250 --> 00:36:30.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>in a military campaign in a war and it was costly it was expensive and we need

00:36:30.720 --> 00:36:34.670
<v Jacob Paulsen>to get some money recovered from that and those colonies in America they are

00:36:34.670 --> 00:36:39.047
<v Jacob Paulsen>just crushing it they are growing like crazy they are putting out tons of crops and

00:36:40.530 --> 00:36:44.420
<v Jacob Paulsen>cotton tobacco I mean they're just doing so much good and so There's a lot of

00:36:44.420 --> 00:36:47.940
<v Jacob Paulsen>wealth in the Americas, and over here, we need to recoup.

00:36:47.940 --> 00:36:52.485
<v Jacob Paulsen>We kind of need to restock the fridge and the bank account, so to speak.

00:36:52.816 --> 00:36:58.780
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you see all these acts getting passed by parliament to basically tax and

00:36:58.780 --> 00:37:02.030
<v Jacob Paulsen>burden a little bit these Americans, which I think from the perspective of the

00:37:02.030 --> 00:37:05.370
<v Jacob Paulsen>king is sort of like, you're my subjects. Go do me the thing, man.

00:37:06.127 --> 00:37:08.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>But Americans don't like that very much, they decided.

00:37:09.407 --> 00:37:13.010
<v Jacob Paulsen>Not just that we don't like these things happening, but that we have no say

00:37:13.010 --> 00:37:16.094
<v Jacob Paulsen>in them happening. There's a good old taxation with that representation.

00:37:16.431 --> 00:37:18.921
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you start to see a lot of conflicts. And the heartbed of this,

00:37:19.188 --> 00:37:21.789
<v Jacob Paulsen>speaking of turnarounds, is Boston.

00:37:22.630 --> 00:37:27.210
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so Boston is – this is the place of rebellion. This is the place where it's

00:37:27.210 --> 00:37:29.613
<v Jacob Paulsen>like we are not putting up with this crap anymore.

00:37:29.944 --> 00:37:32.730
<v Jacob Paulsen>So all these things start to come, Stamp Act, and the –

00:37:36.093 --> 00:37:40.233
<v Jacob Paulsen>The tax on tea and coercion acts all this is kind of coming boom boom boom boom

00:37:40.233 --> 00:37:46.243
<v Jacob Paulsen>boom we have the boston massacre massacre in 74 as well so this is basically

00:37:46.243 --> 00:37:49.363
<v Jacob Paulsen>where that was earlier 73 so

00:37:49.363 --> 00:37:50.123
<v Riley Bowman>I thought that was like.

00:37:51.771 --> 00:37:54.393
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway i'm not sure so this you know the boston massacre is basically where

00:37:54.393 --> 00:37:58.733
<v Jacob Paulsen>you have a bunch of british troops that open fire on some protesters and they

00:37:58.733 --> 00:38:01.753
<v Jacob Paulsen>kill a bunch of people and And we don't like that, we decided.

00:38:01.753 --> 00:38:04.473
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway, these hostilities are kind of escalating.

00:38:04.827 --> 00:38:07.474
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so enter what we call the powder alarm.

00:38:08.895 --> 00:38:13.308
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, I mean, you had the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Quartering Act, the Townsend Acts.

00:38:14.679 --> 00:38:17.809
<v Riley Bowman>That was a big one, right? And all these things just stacked,

00:38:17.809 --> 00:38:19.583
<v Riley Bowman>stacked, stacked, stacked, stacked.

00:38:20.819 --> 00:38:27.829
<v Riley Bowman>And the Intolveral Acts were passed in 1774. And a part of that was the Boston

00:38:27.829 --> 00:38:35.167
<v Riley Bowman>Port Act to shut down the Boston Port and basically punishment for what happened during the Tea Party.

00:38:35.919 --> 00:38:40.859
<v Riley Bowman>Okay that was basically direct just retaliation for the tea party and so boom

00:38:40.859 --> 00:38:46.226
<v Riley Bowman>we're punishing you boston we're shutting down your port until you pay back uh,

00:38:47.199 --> 00:38:51.212
<v Riley Bowman>for the tea that you destroyed okay uh you had,

00:38:52.319 --> 00:38:56.729
<v Riley Bowman>uh the massachusetts government act which was basically just stripped the colonialists

00:38:56.729 --> 00:39:01.708
<v Riley Bowman>of their any of their own part in the government okay so all these things just stack stack stack

00:39:02.114 --> 00:39:07.426
<v Riley Bowman>the first continental congress was formed in direct response to all these things yes

00:39:07.867 --> 00:39:10.572
<v Riley Bowman>and it's in the midst of all this is where you've got,

00:39:11.396 --> 00:39:17.433
<v Riley Bowman>the powder alarm as you said which was boston's basically shut down the port shut down okay uh,

00:39:18.641 --> 00:39:25.219
<v Riley Bowman>they're they they actually the uh the british raided a boston uh powder magazine

00:39:25.219 --> 00:39:28.845
<v Riley Bowman>was called but basically a huge storehouse of gun powder.

00:39:29.060 --> 00:39:32.449
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, bear in mind at the time that, you know, gunpowder is volatile.

00:39:32.449 --> 00:39:34.699
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. And so we don't store it in homes.

00:39:34.699 --> 00:39:36.219
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Except for small amounts.

00:39:36.219 --> 00:39:41.449
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, small amounts. But mostly you have these community powder houses where kind of the...

00:39:41.449 --> 00:39:42.779
<v Riley Bowman>They're generally away from...

00:39:43.179 --> 00:39:46.649
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, away from homes and things. And that's where the major storage of powder

00:39:46.649 --> 00:39:49.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>is so that if something goes wrong, you know, you're not blowing up a bunch of houses. Yep.

00:39:50.364 --> 00:39:56.505
<v Riley Bowman>And so, you know, of course, there's all this tension between the colonialists,

00:39:56.912 --> 00:40:01.387
<v Riley Bowman>the Bostonians especially, and the Brits, the British troops,

00:40:01.991 --> 00:40:05.039
<v Riley Bowman>and their governor, of course. And,

00:40:06.455 --> 00:40:10.500
<v Riley Bowman>So what starts to happen is they're like, hey, we got to get this tamped down.

00:40:10.500 --> 00:40:14.965
<v Riley Bowman>We got to go after the stuff that matters. In this case, we want to get a hold of that powder.

00:40:15.221 --> 00:40:20.242
<v Riley Bowman>So the Boston Powder Magazine is taken away. They raid it.

00:40:21.206 --> 00:40:25.442
<v Riley Bowman>And that's kind of like the first clue into the colonialists that,

00:40:25.651 --> 00:40:29.175
<v Riley Bowman>hey, this is a tactic that they're starting to use.

00:40:29.715 --> 00:40:36.630
<v Riley Bowman>And so when they get word that they're heading for lexington uh via con or concord

00:40:36.630 --> 00:40:43.690
<v Riley Bowman>via lexington right um to seize that powder house that's that's where it really kicks.

00:40:43.690 --> 00:40:46.890
<v Jacob Paulsen>Off well we know it's going to happen right and in fact there was another failed

00:40:46.890 --> 00:40:51.110
<v Jacob Paulsen>attempt uh to the north of boston i can remember what that community was called

00:40:51.110 --> 00:40:53.997
<v Jacob Paulsen>where they tried to seize the powder and they failed and so it's sort of like

00:40:54.299 --> 00:40:57.462
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey we know that you know that this is their game that they're doing this right now.

00:40:57.677 --> 00:41:00.742
<v Jacob Paulsen>The intelligence was clear that they were headed to Concord next.

00:41:01.114 --> 00:41:03.831
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was just a question of like, when are they going and how are they going?

00:41:04.127 --> 00:41:06.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's the good old, you know, one if by land, two if by sea,

00:41:07.209 --> 00:41:08.602
<v Jacob Paulsen>the old North Church, et cetera.

00:41:09.009 --> 00:41:12.486
<v Jacob Paulsen>Paul Revere and William, whatever his name was that went off and warned everybody.

00:41:13.188 --> 00:41:17.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's, yes, that's where all that goes down is this is all about protecting

00:41:17.500 --> 00:41:22.240
<v Jacob Paulsen>our ability to arm and fire back by keeping the

00:41:26.614 --> 00:41:31.188
<v Riley Bowman>The British know they have a problem on their hands because they're way outnumbered,

00:41:31.763 --> 00:41:36.918
<v Riley Bowman>and they're way outnumbered by an angry populace that is all armed, right?

00:41:37.341 --> 00:41:41.074
<v Riley Bowman>And so where this is relevant in the discussion of the Second Amendment for

00:41:41.271 --> 00:41:51.628
<v Riley Bowman>our purposes today is that what do you do about that is you got to exact gun control, right?

00:41:52.028 --> 00:41:57.306
<v Riley Bowman>And so when you have people that you need to control, to get them under control,

00:41:57.306 --> 00:41:59.366
<v Riley Bowman>you need to control their arms.

00:41:59.720 --> 00:42:04.311
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's really what was the tipping point here was, hey,

00:42:04.613 --> 00:42:09.478
<v Riley Bowman>we need to get a hold of all – we can go confiscate guns. That's one thing.

00:42:09.861 --> 00:42:12.932
<v Riley Bowman>But what makes those guns run is their powder.

00:42:13.710 --> 00:42:17.558
<v Riley Bowman>We need to get the powder. And powder was difficult to manufacture.

00:42:18.214 --> 00:42:21.426
<v Riley Bowman>You had to have the right ingredients from the in they're not always they're

00:42:21.426 --> 00:42:26.484
<v Riley Bowman>not available just anywhere yeah right and so if you can get a hold of the powder,

00:42:27.024 --> 00:42:29.439
<v Riley Bowman>then it doesn't matter how many guns they have.

00:42:29.632 --> 00:42:34.626
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in fact we were we we basically never had enough power powder throughout

00:42:34.626 --> 00:42:38.046
<v Jacob Paulsen>the entire american revolutionary war yeah like the war for independence we

00:42:38.046 --> 00:42:39.963
<v Jacob Paulsen>were constantly like low on powder

00:42:40.167 --> 00:42:43.786
<v Jacob Paulsen>yep um which prevented us from being able to train and practice and prepare

00:42:43.786 --> 00:42:45.229
<v Jacob Paulsen>and be a capable fighting force.

00:42:45.676 --> 00:42:49.566
<v Jacob Paulsen>So anyway, yeah, it's effective technique.

00:42:49.566 --> 00:42:50.446
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yep.

00:42:50.446 --> 00:42:55.686
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is basically British policy executed by the local authority,

00:42:55.686 --> 00:42:58.261
<v Jacob Paulsen>the governor, in order to tame a rebellion.

00:42:58.441 --> 00:42:59.196
<v Riley Bowman>Yep, exactly. Exactly.

00:43:01.437 --> 00:43:06.273
<v Riley Bowman>That in itself, I mean, it explains the historical context of what led to the revolution,

00:43:07.306 --> 00:43:12.652
<v Riley Bowman>but it also frames the, for the purposes of our discussion of the Second Amendment,

00:43:13.210 --> 00:43:19.906
<v Riley Bowman>as like this establishes the historical context as well, that it was a recognized

00:43:19.906 --> 00:43:25.636
<v Riley Bowman>thing, like that people owned, kept, and bore arms.

00:43:25.868 --> 00:43:28.887
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. That it was just a part of life. It was a part of society.

00:43:29.078 --> 00:43:32.335
<v Riley Bowman>It was something that everyone had a right to do. Okay.

00:43:33.166 --> 00:43:35.481
<v Riley Bowman>Except for in the case of blacks, like we already talked about.

00:43:37.006 --> 00:43:40.990
<v Riley Bowman>And in some cases where I think Massachusetts was one of those states that required

00:43:41.344 --> 00:43:47.201
<v Riley Bowman>its citizens to have arms for purposes of participating in militia.

00:43:47.747 --> 00:43:56.666
<v Riley Bowman>And so that also establishes this pre-constitutional recognition of the right to keep and bear arms.

00:43:57.046 --> 00:43:58.997
<v Riley Bowman>So that's why this is an important historical context.

00:43:59.409 --> 00:44:03.235
<v Riley Bowman>I know we're preaching to the choir, but we want to understand the history here.

00:44:03.374 --> 00:44:04.344
<v Jacob Paulsen>The timeline matters.

00:44:04.750 --> 00:44:07.578
<v Riley Bowman>And so, of course, we know what happens with Lexington and Concord.

00:44:08.426 --> 00:44:12.186
<v Riley Bowman>And you guys just got a replay of that episode where we went into the specifics

00:44:12.186 --> 00:44:13.452
<v Riley Bowman>on the events surrounding that.

00:44:13.980 --> 00:44:17.316
<v Riley Bowman>So I don't know, we didn't need to spend a ton of time on actual Lexington and

00:44:17.316 --> 00:44:23.276
<v Riley Bowman>Concord, but hey, hurrah. Like, you know, the little skirmish at Lexington was,

00:44:23.276 --> 00:44:26.506
<v Riley Bowman>that's really what it was, was skirmish. It wasn't a whole lot.

00:44:26.883 --> 00:44:31.922
<v Riley Bowman>Concord was a little bit heated, but what was really remarkable was the...

00:44:33.298 --> 00:44:40.315
<v Riley Bowman>The patriotic spirit was really, you see that, I mean, I think it always and

00:44:40.315 --> 00:44:43.225
<v Riley Bowman>already did exist, but you see it in,

00:44:44.641 --> 00:44:52.485
<v Riley Bowman>these patriots as they chase the British all the way back to Boston following Lexington and Concord.

00:44:52.485 --> 00:44:56.709
<v Riley Bowman>And they just, they're just ambushing them all along the way.

00:44:57.562 --> 00:45:04.785
<v Riley Bowman>And, uh, I mean, I just, I, I admire these, these scrappy men.

00:45:04.785 --> 00:45:06.475
<v Riley Bowman>That's really, that's the word I was looking for a moment ago.

00:45:06.475 --> 00:45:10.545
<v Riley Bowman>I was trying to think of this word. Like how do we describe them? They were scrappy.

00:45:10.845 --> 00:45:17.571
<v Riley Bowman>They were tough, but it was really, it was a scrappy toughness that they were not an organized army.

00:45:18.453 --> 00:45:22.587
<v Riley Bowman>Far from it. They didn't have a lot of training. They were just hardworking,

00:45:23.051 --> 00:45:27.185
<v Riley Bowman>Americans that said, we've had enough and.

00:45:28.625 --> 00:45:30.015
<v Riley Bowman>We're willing now at this point

00:45:30.015 --> 00:45:34.411
<v Riley Bowman>to give up our lives and chase the British all the way back to Boston.

00:45:39.455 --> 00:45:44.586
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't know if I can talk about this without crying. Just no hesitation.

00:45:47.079 --> 00:45:51.785
<v Jacob Paulsen>They had already made the decision. When the call came, no hesitation.

00:45:52.684 --> 00:45:57.630
<v Riley Bowman>We have to honor these folks of Massachusetts, in that Boston area especially,

00:45:58.420 --> 00:46:06.773
<v Riley Bowman>for their part in the revolution because they really forced the hand of the rest of the colonies.

00:46:07.639 --> 00:46:09.309
<v Riley Bowman>I mean the other colonies they forced.

00:46:09.309 --> 00:46:12.439
<v Jacob Paulsen>The hand of King George King George forced the hand of the rest of the colonies

00:46:13.079 --> 00:46:16.179
<v Riley Bowman>I mean because as you find and we don't,

00:46:17.039 --> 00:46:21.739
<v Riley Bowman>we're not going to go into the actual war for independence and the whole you

00:46:21.739 --> 00:46:26.139
<v Riley Bowman>know and the continental congresses and everything that happened there but there was,

00:46:26.659 --> 00:46:31.069
<v Riley Bowman>and of course even drafting the constitution there was a lot of you had 13 colonies

00:46:31.069 --> 00:46:33.295
<v Riley Bowman>eventually 13 states that,

00:46:33.794 --> 00:46:38.039
<v Riley Bowman>they all viewed this very differently You had certain colonies that were like,

00:46:38.039 --> 00:46:41.399
<v Riley Bowman>eh, we're cool with, you know, like we don't like it, but we're still going

00:46:41.399 --> 00:46:43.221
<v Riley Bowman>to try to play nice with England.

00:46:43.645 --> 00:46:46.939
<v Riley Bowman>And others like Massachusetts, like we are done.

00:46:48.419 --> 00:46:51.609
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was the center hub, right? So things spread out. I mean, it went from being

00:46:51.609 --> 00:46:55.859
<v Jacob Paulsen>like Bostonians are all about this independence thing. The rest of us don't love it.

00:46:56.155 --> 00:46:59.934
<v Jacob Paulsen>Then it was about, well, those new Englanders are all about this independence thing.

00:47:00.195 --> 00:47:03.887
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then, of course, you have the Carolina campaign where Clinton runs down,

00:47:04.125 --> 00:47:08.763
<v Jacob Paulsen>General Clinton's British officer runs down to the Carolinas and tries to rabble-rise a little bit.

00:47:09.187 --> 00:47:11.959
<v Jacob Paulsen>And all of a sudden, the Southerners are like, oh, we're on board now.

00:47:12.559 --> 00:47:14.739
<v Riley Bowman>That pissed us off. The fight's coming to us now?

00:47:15.979 --> 00:47:18.711
<v Jacob Paulsen>It spread like a fire. That's really the takeaway. Exactly.

00:47:19.198 --> 00:47:23.999
<v Riley Bowman>Now we're going to fast-forward to the drafting and ratification of the Constitution.

00:47:23.999 --> 00:47:26.170
<v Riley Bowman>And, of course, a big part of that, the Second Amendment.

00:47:26.379 --> 00:47:29.154
<v Jacob Paulsen>The Constitution's getting drafted. You can call it from...

00:47:30.112 --> 00:47:36.859
<v Jacob Paulsen>87 to 88 is really kind of the ratification and signing of the U.S.

00:47:36.859 --> 00:47:41.258
<v Jacob Paulsen>Constitution, which initially, of course, has nothing in it about the right to bear arms.

00:47:42.286 --> 00:47:45.699
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this was a highly debated topic. You know, when James Madison and that whole

00:47:45.699 --> 00:47:50.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>contingency were meeting and drafting the U.S. Constitution,

00:47:50.657 --> 00:47:52.719
<v Jacob Paulsen>there was a lot of debate about a lot of these things. And it was sort of like,

00:47:52.719 --> 00:47:54.378
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, we can add those amendments later.

00:47:54.709 --> 00:47:59.069
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like let's leave out anything that might be, you know, that might overcomplicate

00:47:59.069 --> 00:48:02.719
<v Jacob Paulsen>or lengthen the document. So that's where, you know, and it was also sort of

00:48:02.719 --> 00:48:04.629
<v Jacob Paulsen>like, those are the kinds of things that could be enumerated later.

00:48:05.065 --> 00:48:07.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in fact, there were, you know, if you go look at the Federalist Papers and

00:48:08.356 --> 00:48:12.289
<v Jacob Paulsen>some of these things, there were a lot of these, I guess we call them states

00:48:12.289 --> 00:48:17.099
<v Jacob Paulsen>at that time, a lot of these states that basically didn't want to ratify the U.S.

00:48:17.099 --> 00:48:21.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>Constitution unless there was a promise of this Bill of Rights coming immediately thereafter.

00:48:22.443 --> 00:48:24.799
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so you really have the U.S. government, as we know it today,

00:48:24.799 --> 00:48:30.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>stood up in 1989, excuse me, 1789 with President Washington.

00:48:31.599 --> 00:48:34.187
<v Jacob Paulsen>Immediately, we start working on the bill of rights.

00:48:35.255 --> 00:48:39.329
<v Riley Bowman>That's exactly right. There had to be this compromise. The Federalists and the

00:48:39.329 --> 00:48:42.783
<v Riley Bowman>Anti-Federalists, that was where this sticking point was.

00:48:43.739 --> 00:48:46.979
<v Riley Bowman>The Federalists, of course, wanted a very strong federal government.

00:48:46.979 --> 00:48:50.476
<v Riley Bowman>Anti-Federalists, not so much. More focus on states and state rights.

00:48:50.714 --> 00:48:55.409
<v Riley Bowman>Of course, we I mean, we know it's not perfect, but I think what our founding

00:48:55.409 --> 00:49:00.669
<v Riley Bowman>fathers achieved in creating this nation and drafting our Constitution with

00:49:00.669 --> 00:49:04.327
<v Riley Bowman>its accompanying Bill of Rights did a remarkable thing to...

00:49:06.805 --> 00:49:10.892
<v Riley Bowman>Come as close as possible to perfect as far as checks and balances within a

00:49:10.892 --> 00:49:17.474
<v Riley Bowman>federal government and between federal and states uh not an easy thing to do and.

00:49:17.810 --> 00:49:21.142
<v Jacob Paulsen>And there's nothing else out there like it at the time yeah so it is they're

00:49:21.142 --> 00:49:25.562
<v Jacob Paulsen>really building from scratch um there were democracies and republics at this

00:49:25.562 --> 00:49:28.619
<v Jacob Paulsen>time but they were all really tiny little governments

00:49:29.049 --> 00:49:32.032
<v Jacob Paulsen>um like little tiny colonies and things like that there was nothing like the

00:49:32.032 --> 00:49:34.412
<v Jacob Paulsen>dutch i believe were right a republic.

00:49:36.292 --> 00:49:39.292
<v Jacob Paulsen>In fact, it was thought, it was believed at the time that that kind of a government

00:49:39.292 --> 00:49:40.949
<v Jacob Paulsen>system couldn't work at scale.

00:49:42.312 --> 00:49:46.232
<v Jacob Paulsen>So yes, what they did was absolutely revolutionary in so many senses of the word.

00:49:46.545 --> 00:49:48.892
<v Jacob Paulsen>They did so many things that had never been done before. I already mentioned

00:49:48.892 --> 00:49:50.585
<v Jacob Paulsen>one, the separation of church and state.

00:49:52.420 --> 00:49:56.012
<v Jacob Paulsen>Maybe I'm going too deep for this episode, but without question,

00:49:56.012 --> 00:50:00.698
<v Jacob Paulsen>yeah, like perfect you may not think it is, but as close to perfect.

00:50:02.451 --> 00:50:02.590
<v Riley Bowman>It

00:50:02.770 --> 00:50:07.540
<v Jacob Paulsen>Must be pretty good since every other nation on the planet has basically adopted it since then yep

00:50:08.185 --> 00:50:13.412
<v Riley Bowman>Or a version of it for sure well and i only shared that because i think this

00:50:13.412 --> 00:50:17.532
<v Riley Bowman>context is important and especially because if if you had had the fearless way

00:50:17.532 --> 00:50:20.852
<v Riley Bowman>and like james madison's you know of way uh.

00:50:23.040 --> 00:50:28.193
<v Riley Bowman>We would have just had the Constitution. And I think eventually we would have

00:50:28.193 --> 00:50:32.479
<v Riley Bowman>had amendments added, but we would not have had the Bill of Rights,

00:50:33.503 --> 00:50:42.703
<v Riley Bowman>which has enshrined so many very core and key principles in our nation's government

00:50:43.143 --> 00:50:44.576
<v Riley Bowman>and constitutional structure.

00:50:45.441 --> 00:50:52.134
<v Riley Bowman>That would not have happened had there not been this compromise and eventually agreement to,

00:50:52.866 --> 00:50:56.823
<v Riley Bowman>i mean because you had multiple states that were holdouts essentially on ratifying

00:50:56.823 --> 00:51:00.261
<v Riley Bowman>the constitution they're like we're not we're not doing it we're not doing it,

00:51:00.749 --> 00:51:03.983
<v Riley Bowman>but you guys got to give us the word we're gonna we're gonna actually then work

00:51:03.983 --> 00:51:09.473
<v Riley Bowman>on these bill of rights and so in 1791 the bill of rights is finally you know

00:51:09.473 --> 00:51:11.543
<v Riley Bowman>crafted and ratified as well,

00:51:12.383 --> 00:51:13.825
<v Riley Bowman>uh and and and think.

00:51:14.943 --> 00:51:17.750
<v Riley Bowman>I'm just gonna say, thank God that happened.

00:51:18.156 --> 00:51:22.613
<v Riley Bowman>Because if we didn't have, can you imagine what life would be like today if

00:51:22.613 --> 00:51:25.313
<v Riley Bowman>we didn't even have the Second Amendment?

00:51:26.063 --> 00:51:30.743
<v Riley Bowman>Understand that, like, I think where the mind was at for some of the Federalists,

00:51:31.623 --> 00:51:34.166
<v Riley Bowman>especially those that were like, no, the Constitution's good, man.

00:51:34.416 --> 00:51:40.763
<v Riley Bowman>As I think where they were at was, they weren't thinking about all the possibilities down the road.

00:51:41.469 --> 00:51:45.053
<v Riley Bowman>They were just looking like, and it's hard to do. It's hard to be forward thinking

00:51:45.053 --> 00:51:50.467
<v Riley Bowman>when you look at your world and you have all these assumptions and biases that you just live with.

00:51:51.448 --> 00:51:56.306
<v Riley Bowman>And to them, probably something as simple as the right to keep and bear arms was just a given.

00:51:57.084 --> 00:51:59.883
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? Right, right. And it was this, remember, the English Bill of Rights had

00:51:59.883 --> 00:52:03.921
<v Jacob Paulsen>been written basically 100 years before the US Constitution is being ratified by each state.

00:52:05.198 --> 00:52:10.504
<v Jacob Paulsen>So yes, it was a given because it was a given. as colonies of the British Empire

00:52:10.713 --> 00:52:16.152
<v Jacob Paulsen>it was a given right enumerated in the English Bill of Rights and so it was, yes, I think that

00:52:17.365 --> 00:52:22.432
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like how I would rephrase what you said in my own words would be that maybe

00:52:22.641 --> 00:52:27.472
<v Jacob Paulsen>the sense was we don't need to write those things out because we just all know that it's a thing.

00:52:28.672 --> 00:52:31.627
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then you have states like, wait a minute. Like if we sign this though,

00:52:32.087 --> 00:52:36.382
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's not good enough for us that there's an assumption. Like we want it in the document.

00:52:36.382 --> 00:52:36.724
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:52:36.847 --> 00:52:41.202
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so in order to kind of get the ratification process complete across all

00:52:41.202 --> 00:52:45.372
<v Jacob Paulsen>the colonies, the promise is basically made like, okay, you got it.

00:52:45.372 --> 00:52:49.756
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like we will just sign it and then we'll work on that. We'll get it in there.

00:52:50.035 --> 00:52:52.444
<v Riley Bowman>I'm sorry. I'm chuckling a little bit because it sounds like,

00:52:52.630 --> 00:52:55.492
<v Riley Bowman>you know, the Obamacare bill.

00:52:56.792 --> 00:52:59.567
<v Riley Bowman>Just sign it. Just pass it. And then read and find out what's in it.

00:53:01.232 --> 00:53:04.452
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, so that's kind of how this went down.

00:53:04.872 --> 00:53:11.312
<v Riley Bowman>And as I said, thank goodness that we actually ended up with a Bill of Rights,

00:53:11.843 --> 00:53:14.171
<v Riley Bowman>and the Second Amendment as part of that.

00:53:15.552 --> 00:53:19.628
<v Riley Bowman>And it is the second thing that they included in that.

00:53:20.452 --> 00:53:24.655
<v Riley Bowman>I think it is appropriate. It's in the order that the amendments are in the order that they are.

00:53:24.951 --> 00:53:28.794
<v Riley Bowman>First Amendment, free speech, right to assembly, right to worship.

00:53:29.952 --> 00:53:36.462
<v Riley Bowman>I think that is so, so important and so key and so core to our nation's founding and values as well.

00:53:37.712 --> 00:53:39.732
<v Riley Bowman>And then the Second Amendment, just like right on its heels,

00:53:39.732 --> 00:53:43.985
<v Riley Bowman>like this is important to us as a nation, the right to keep and bear arms.

00:53:44.258 --> 00:53:45.852
<v Riley Bowman>And it is an individual right.

00:53:45.852 --> 00:53:46.307
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, yeah.

00:53:46.972 --> 00:53:49.489
<v Riley Bowman>And it is a right to defense. Okay.

00:53:50.232 --> 00:53:54.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. I mean, it is the right of the individual to have the gun.

00:53:54.649 --> 00:53:57.244
<v Jacob Paulsen>It is the right of the individual to have that gun for self-defense.

00:53:57.586 --> 00:54:01.982
<v Jacob Paulsen>It is the right of the individual to go about their business on a day with that

00:54:01.982 --> 00:54:05.002
<v Jacob Paulsen>gun in into in order to protect those rights.

00:54:05.002 --> 00:54:05.312
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:54:05.312 --> 00:54:10.702
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like these are the things that time has been required to prove that that was

00:54:10.702 --> 00:54:12.963
<v Jacob Paulsen>the intention of that of that bill of rights.

00:54:13.201 --> 00:54:15.186
<v Jacob Paulsen>And of course, you know, that's kind of where we're going next.

00:54:17.004 --> 00:54:19.465
<v Riley Bowman>So, Constitution, Bill of Rights are created.

00:54:22.107 --> 00:54:24.115
<v Jacob Paulsen>1791. That'll be our next big

00:54:24.463 --> 00:54:28.352
<v Jacob Paulsen>250th anniversary. It'll be the 250th anniversary of the Bill of Rights.

00:54:28.352 --> 00:54:32.852
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, we should do something about that. And so, that happens.

00:54:32.852 --> 00:54:35.562
<v Riley Bowman>And then things kind of go quiet for a while.

00:54:36.050 --> 00:54:40.932
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yeah. Apparently, we don't have a lot of people running around shooting up schools.

00:54:41.193 --> 00:54:41.594
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:54:41.774 --> 00:54:44.482
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, you know, that's just kind of a non-issue. And not to mention,

00:54:44.482 --> 00:54:45.802
<v Jacob Paulsen>the gun is allowing us to.

00:54:46.319 --> 00:54:50.852
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, the next century allows us to conquer a continent, to become a superpower.

00:54:51.392 --> 00:54:55.772
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like you could think of it like the founders of this country were handed a trust

00:54:55.772 --> 00:54:58.404
<v Jacob Paulsen>fund in the form of land and territory.

00:54:58.990 --> 00:55:03.773
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. And man, we cashed in on that trust fund big time. But in order to do it, we used guns.

00:55:04.081 --> 00:55:06.112
<v Jacob Paulsen>And some of the things we did, you know, another stain on America,

00:55:06.112 --> 00:55:10.442
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, we mentioned slavery, another stain on the legacy of the founders,

00:55:10.442 --> 00:55:11.832
<v Jacob Paulsen>of course, is how we dealt with Native Americans.

00:55:11.832 --> 00:55:12.652
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, Native Americans, yeah.

00:55:13.072 --> 00:55:18.052
<v Jacob Paulsen>But putting all that aside, the reality is the gun was a necessary element for

00:55:18.052 --> 00:55:25.252
<v Jacob Paulsen>us to conquer a continent and to establish the first real, I shouldn't say,

00:55:25.712 --> 00:55:27.452
<v Jacob Paulsen>a new order of a global superpower.

00:55:29.727 --> 00:55:35.522
<v Riley Bowman>It's an unfortunate reality that had we not marched west and conquered this

00:55:35.522 --> 00:55:37.018
<v Riley Bowman>nation, this continent,

00:55:37.900 --> 00:55:39.196
<v Riley Bowman>majority of a continent some of it.

00:55:39.196 --> 00:55:40.626
<v Jacob Paulsen>With money some of it by by

00:55:40.626 --> 00:55:44.026
<v Riley Bowman>Force um you know because i'm sure some some there's probably somebody out there

00:55:44.026 --> 00:55:47.229
<v Riley Bowman>even listening that would be like well i wish we hadn't you know,

00:55:47.844 --> 00:55:51.246
<v Riley Bowman>done what we did to the native americans i'm with you there we did horrible

00:55:51.246 --> 00:55:57.066
<v Riley Bowman>and atrocious things um but what happened happened and and they did things maybe

00:55:57.066 --> 00:56:01.373
<v Riley Bowman>didn't they didn't have the knowledge we have today either uh or an understanding um,

00:56:02.325 --> 00:56:07.236
<v Riley Bowman>but uh you could you could suppose that we just stayed within you know the original

00:56:07.236 --> 00:56:10.371
<v Riley Bowman>13 colonies or maybe a slightly larger version of that,

00:56:10.882 --> 00:56:15.486
<v Riley Bowman>but somebody would have conquered like if we didn't do that somebody would have

00:56:15.486 --> 00:56:21.286
<v Riley Bowman>filled that vacuum right i mean mexican we well mexicans already had part of that,

00:56:21.926 --> 00:56:25.316
<v Riley Bowman>right but you know what i mean like like if we didn't do it somebody else was

00:56:25.316 --> 00:56:27.635
<v Riley Bowman>going to do it like that was going to happen one way or another,

00:56:28.413 --> 00:56:33.190
<v Riley Bowman>anyway but let's jump now to the mid uh mid 19th century So the mid-1800s.

00:56:33.910 --> 00:56:37.196
<v Riley Bowman>And of course, we know another stay in our nation's history,

00:56:37.196 --> 00:56:42.786
<v Riley Bowman>of course, we already touched on it, was dealing with the rights of all people

00:56:42.786 --> 00:56:47.116
<v Riley Bowman>in America. And by that, I'm specifically referring to black Americans.

00:56:48.906 --> 00:56:52.887
<v Riley Bowman>And of course, there's the whole Civil War that took place as a big deal.

00:56:54.122 --> 00:57:00.722
<v Riley Bowman>Chunk you know big part of that but something led up to that specifically,

00:57:01.744 --> 00:57:08.188
<v Riley Bowman>and in 19 or in 1857 you had the dred scott versus sanford uh supreme court

00:57:08.188 --> 00:57:10.353
<v Riley Bowman>case that came before the court there,

00:57:10.951 --> 00:57:15.432
<v Riley Bowman>uh and this is important to acknowledge we won't spend a ton of time on this

00:57:15.786 --> 00:57:20.618
<v Riley Bowman>and it was something that kind of accelerated some of the tensions between north

00:57:20.618 --> 00:57:23.095
<v Riley Bowman>and south uh leading up to the civil war,

00:57:23.791 --> 00:57:28.029
<v Riley Bowman>but the dred scott case was basically the case involving a,

00:57:29.268 --> 00:57:30.873
<v Riley Bowman>uh a slave who uh.

00:57:32.441 --> 00:57:37.323
<v Riley Bowman>Through you know the laws were kind of complex back then but the his his owner

00:57:37.712 --> 00:57:42.488
<v Riley Bowman>moved to illinois and he felt and there was a law that after a certain amount

00:57:42.488 --> 00:57:45.972
<v Riley Bowman>of time he could basically become a free man okay,

00:57:46.692 --> 00:57:50.268
<v Riley Bowman>and his owner was basically saying no that's not the case you are not a free

00:57:50.268 --> 00:57:53.819
<v Riley Bowman>man This man is basically suing for his emancipation,

00:57:54.868 --> 00:57:58.475
<v Riley Bowman>and for that of his family, his wife and his children as well.

00:57:59.648 --> 00:58:04.538
<v Riley Bowman>And so he went to the Supreme Court arguing this. Now, what the specifics of

00:58:04.538 --> 00:58:10.851
<v Riley Bowman>that case, we're not here to talk about, you know, whether the merits of that case per se.

00:58:11.193 --> 00:58:16.408
<v Riley Bowman>But what was included in that case was kind of interesting because in the opinion

00:58:16.408 --> 00:58:19.332
<v Riley Bowman>written by Chief Justice Taney at that time.

00:58:21.448 --> 00:58:26.629
<v Riley Bowman>He talked about the right to keep and carry arms wherever they went. That's a quotation.

00:58:27.227 --> 00:58:31.258
<v Riley Bowman>To keep and carry arms wherever they went. Referencing one of the privileges

00:58:31.258 --> 00:58:33.305
<v Riley Bowman>of citizenship. Yes. Okay.

00:58:34.171 --> 00:58:41.160
<v Riley Bowman>And so basically one of the reasons why he could not rule and why the majority

00:58:41.160 --> 00:58:45.049
<v Riley Bowman>did not rule in favor of this black man seeking his freedom,

00:58:45.624 --> 00:58:50.806
<v Riley Bowman>was because that would mean that we therefore must grant to this man and his family,

00:58:52.820 --> 00:58:59.630
<v Riley Bowman>all rights, and including the right to keep and bear arms. And we just can't have that happening.

00:58:59.851 --> 00:59:05.801
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. The way this is established in this case is that there's full citizenship

00:59:06.201 --> 00:59:08.169
<v Jacob Paulsen>and there's partial citizenship.

00:59:08.581 --> 00:59:13.330
<v Jacob Paulsen>And being a full citizen of our wonderful country means you get all of these rights.

00:59:13.870 --> 00:59:18.770
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we don't want these black people, speaking for the perspective of the Supreme

00:59:18.770 --> 00:59:21.970
<v Jacob Paulsen>Court at the time, the majority of the Supreme Court, we don't want these black

00:59:21.970 --> 00:59:25.880
<v Jacob Paulsen>people to have all the rights, particularly the Second Amendment one.

00:59:25.880 --> 00:59:27.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>It sounds pretty scary if they get that.

00:59:27.848 --> 00:59:31.700
<v Jacob Paulsen>So therefore, we're going to kind of create this concept that black people are

00:59:31.700 --> 00:59:36.910
<v Jacob Paulsen>not a full citizen of the United States. And therefore, they don't have a right

00:59:36.910 --> 00:59:41.089
<v Jacob Paulsen>to all of the rights that come with citizenship in this country.

00:59:42.600 --> 00:59:44.610
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is widely regarded to be one of the worst decisions the U.S.

00:59:44.610 --> 00:59:48.150
<v Jacob Paulsen>Supreme Court ever made. And obviously, it leads to some pretty nasty things.

00:59:48.150 --> 00:59:49.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>We come out of it better in the end.

00:59:52.060 --> 00:59:55.130
<v Jacob Paulsen>But there's also a little interesting side note here that's worth pointing out.

00:59:55.524 --> 00:59:58.460
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that is that the Supreme Court, in writing this decision,

00:59:58.460 --> 01:00:01.468
<v Jacob Paulsen>which was terrible for black people and terrible in that respect,

01:00:01.950 --> 01:00:05.845
<v Jacob Paulsen>they also wrote it based on the assumption that citizenship in this country

01:00:06.235 --> 01:00:10.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>gave you the right to go about bearing arms. Right? Exactly.

01:00:11.620 --> 01:00:17.130
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's also like, yes, this is a problematic stance. And this decision was obviously

01:00:17.130 --> 01:00:20.800
<v Jacob Paulsen>overturned later with an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:25.078
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, the 13th and specifically the 14th Amendment, which granted all rights to all citizens.

01:00:25.263 --> 01:00:30.300
<v Jacob Paulsen>But you can't look at it as, at the time, the precedent was citizenship grants

01:00:30.300 --> 01:00:34.970
<v Jacob Paulsen>you the right not just to own a gun, but to have it and go about with it in society.

01:00:35.280 --> 01:00:35.503
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly.

01:00:36.345 --> 01:00:41.505
<v Riley Bowman>So another important piece of this historical context that we're here discussing today.

01:00:41.865 --> 01:00:46.959
<v Riley Bowman>And that, I believe, is also referenced in the Heller decision to basically

01:00:46.959 --> 01:00:49.183
<v Riley Bowman>show, hey, here is this historical context.

01:00:49.944 --> 01:00:55.064
<v Riley Bowman>And what was so key about the Heller decision was that this is an individual right.

01:00:56.016 --> 01:00:59.104
<v Riley Bowman>And that's the acknowledgement here in this Dred Scott case.

01:00:59.889 --> 01:01:04.235
<v Riley Bowman>In this majority opinion written by Chief Justice Taney,

01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:10.329
<v Riley Bowman>that's where this individual right was in a way being referenced that hey here

01:01:10.329 --> 01:01:17.407
<v Riley Bowman>is an individual suing for his freedom and if we grant him that then we must also grant him this,

01:01:18.208 --> 01:01:20.907
<v Riley Bowman>individual right of keeping and bearing arms,

01:01:22.260 --> 01:01:27.943
<v Riley Bowman>super important part with those arguments that were made in the Heller case 151 years later,

01:01:29.273 --> 01:01:32.826
<v Riley Bowman>Then, of course, we know what happened. Civil War, of course, happens.

01:01:33.795 --> 01:01:36.614
<v Riley Bowman>Horrible, terrible, nasty thing, but unfortunately, it was necessary,

01:01:36.614 --> 01:01:43.324
<v Riley Bowman>I think, to fight our way through these challenges and to, as you said a moment

01:01:43.324 --> 01:01:47.001
<v Riley Bowman>ago, come out the other side eventually stronger and better for it.

01:01:48.905 --> 01:01:53.525
<v Riley Bowman>Immediately following the Civil War, so in 1865, the 13th Amendment was passed,

01:01:54.512 --> 01:01:57.612
<v Riley Bowman>and the 14th Amendment very, very shortly thereafter.

01:01:59.214 --> 01:02:04.317
<v Riley Bowman>Granting all rights to all citizens, which now, of course, all citizens meant

01:02:04.537 --> 01:02:09.907
<v Riley Bowman>we are including all people, including especially black people. And so.

01:02:11.454 --> 01:02:12.421
<v Jacob Paulsen>But not women yet.

01:02:13.114 --> 01:02:20.554
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. That's a topic for another day. And so what happened? So this is an interesting

01:02:20.554 --> 01:02:23.864
<v Riley Bowman>thing. We have a section of history we're referred to as the Black Codes.

01:02:23.864 --> 01:02:26.329
<v Riley Bowman>This was like 1865 to 1866.

01:02:26.689 --> 01:02:31.744
<v Riley Bowman>And the reason why this even exists, and this is interesting to kind of note

01:02:31.744 --> 01:02:36.587
<v Riley Bowman>and point out, was that with the passage of the 13th Amendment, we now say all people,

01:02:37.514 --> 01:02:43.007
<v Riley Bowman>white, black, whatever color you are, you're a citizen of America, a full citizen, right?

01:02:44.202 --> 01:02:48.529
<v Riley Bowman>And so now, hey, these are free people, and that must mean that it comes with

01:02:48.529 --> 01:02:50.866
<v Riley Bowman>rights. If they're citizens, they get rights, right?

01:02:51.516 --> 01:02:55.449
<v Riley Bowman>Well, you immediately start seeing different states, especially the Confederate,

01:02:55.449 --> 01:03:01.749
<v Riley Bowman>the Southern states, passing laws known as Black Codes to restrict as much as they could,

01:03:02.349 --> 01:03:06.783
<v Riley Bowman>as far as they felt they could, these new citizens' rights.

01:03:07.033 --> 01:03:11.044
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is very equivalent to what we're seeing happening right now post-Bruin. Yeah.

01:03:11.929 --> 01:03:16.629
<v Jacob Paulsen>The U.S. Supreme Court says all this stuff about guns. Well, then fine.

01:03:17.149 --> 01:03:20.179
<v Jacob Paulsen>We're going to then pass this new gun law and this new gun. And then we've got

01:03:20.179 --> 01:03:23.709
<v Jacob Paulsen>to go fight the same kind of thing then where it's like, hey,

01:03:23.709 --> 01:03:26.839
<v Jacob Paulsen>we've decided that these black people are citizens. And therefore,

01:03:26.839 --> 01:03:28.209
<v Jacob Paulsen>as such, they get all these rights.

01:03:28.732 --> 01:03:31.339
<v Jacob Paulsen>Okay, well, then fine. Then we're going to restrict this, this,

01:03:31.339 --> 01:03:35.048
<v Jacob Paulsen>and this so far as we can within our state.

01:03:35.233 --> 01:03:38.177
<v Jacob Paulsen>So a similar kind of thing happening at that time.

01:03:39.209 --> 01:03:47.661
<v Jacob Paulsen>And devastating, I might add. It requires more civil rights reform down the road to clean this up.

01:03:47.817 --> 01:03:52.199
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Specifically, you had states like Mississippi and South Carolina that

01:03:52.199 --> 01:03:57.889
<v Riley Bowman>passed laws that specifically barred freedmen from owning or carrying weapons.

01:03:58.341 --> 01:04:01.233
<v Riley Bowman>They didn't totally say that you couldn't do it.

01:04:01.726 --> 01:04:05.119
<v Riley Bowman>But part of that was you got to have a license to do so. And then,

01:04:05.119 --> 01:04:08.222
<v Riley Bowman>of course, what do they do? They make those licenses dang near impossible to get.

01:04:08.408 --> 01:04:09.400
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sounds familiar.

01:04:09.929 --> 01:04:11.321
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Strange, right?

01:04:14.027 --> 01:04:19.455
<v Riley Bowman>Right so um and so that's what happened almost immediately after the 13th amendment,

01:04:19.983 --> 01:04:22.496
<v Riley Bowman>before reconstruction protections were in place,

01:04:23.315 --> 01:04:28.195
<v Riley Bowman>so that's where the 14th amendment was an answer to a lot of this because it

01:04:28.195 --> 01:04:32.485
<v Riley Bowman>just needed further clarification like the 13th amendment basically said hey

01:04:32.485 --> 01:04:37.375
<v Riley Bowman>all people are now citizens and are free,

01:04:38.240 --> 01:04:43.231
<v Riley Bowman>and it was sort of like what we talked a moment ago, now there's this assumption that that means,

01:04:44.345 --> 01:04:46.486
<v Riley Bowman>all citizens get the same rights, right?

01:04:47.165 --> 01:04:51.693
<v Riley Bowman>In theory. But that's not how it was actually being implemented.

01:04:52.124 --> 01:04:56.225
<v Riley Bowman>And so the 14th Amendment was that amendment that now was like,

01:04:56.225 --> 01:04:58.515
<v Riley Bowman>no, we need this to specify.

01:04:58.515 --> 01:05:00.685
<v Riley Bowman>Because what does the 14th Amendment say? I can't quote it exactly,

01:05:00.685 --> 01:05:07.844
<v Riley Bowman>but it basically says that no government shall restrict the rights of any citizen.

01:05:09.659 --> 01:05:12.687
<v Riley Bowman>And so, and of course, there's the due process clause and other things that

01:05:12.687 --> 01:05:15.897
<v Riley Bowman>are part of that 14th Amendment, but that was a big part of it was this clarification

01:05:15.897 --> 01:05:22.163
<v Riley Bowman>that, no, this means all citizens have access to all of the same rights.

01:05:23.434 --> 01:05:28.943
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's where the 14th Amendment comes from. So then, and the other thing,

01:05:29.987 --> 01:05:33.897
<v Riley Bowman>if I recall, in some of my research, Jacob, there was even some debate about

01:05:33.897 --> 01:05:36.402
<v Riley Bowman>some of the verbiage in the 14th Amendment.

01:05:37.187 --> 01:05:41.829
<v Riley Bowman>And that went back and forth a little bit. But one variation of the 14th Amendment

01:05:41.962 --> 01:05:45.555
<v Riley Bowman>had, I think, something more specific regarding the Second Amendment.

01:05:48.040 --> 01:05:51.070
<v Riley Bowman>But the way that, see here,

01:05:53.927 --> 01:05:56.527
<v Riley Bowman>I had a quote here from the 14th Amendment.

01:05:59.110 --> 01:06:00.277
<v Riley Bowman>I might not be able to pull that up.

01:06:01.967 --> 01:06:05.200
<v Jacob Paulsen>In the end, it was just decided to be unnecessary to have it in there. Right, right.

01:06:05.667 --> 01:06:13.827
<v Riley Bowman>Right. And so anyway, but there's my point I'm trying to make here is that it's

01:06:13.827 --> 01:06:15.587
<v Riley Bowman>important to see that the 14th Amendment.

01:06:15.587 --> 01:06:18.627
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, that thing that this is some of the tie in I was looking for,

01:06:18.627 --> 01:06:22.887
<v Riley Bowman>Jacob, that the 14th Amendment, it's clear in reading the text of the 14th Amendment

01:06:22.887 --> 01:06:26.730
<v Riley Bowman>that it is applying to individuals, not a collective right.

01:06:27.527 --> 01:06:31.397
<v Riley Bowman>And that that must also therefore mean that you know kind of sort of,

01:06:31.879 --> 01:06:37.027
<v Riley Bowman>indirectly we're also suggesting that again or reinforcing the idea that things

01:06:37.027 --> 01:06:40.927
<v Riley Bowman>like the first amendment the second amendment and so on we are talking about

01:06:40.927 --> 01:06:46.280
<v Riley Bowman>individual rights and so the 14th amendment is reinforcing these individual rights,

01:06:46.925 --> 01:06:51.867
<v Riley Bowman>uh and therefore you know that's another context piece to where we're trying

01:06:51.867 --> 01:06:54.887
<v Riley Bowman>to lead to today you know so we get we get into this part of history and we're

01:06:54.887 --> 01:06:57.879
<v Riley Bowman>going to talk about that some more here in a moment where,

01:06:59.956 --> 01:07:04.216
<v Riley Bowman>It starts to become interpreted that the Second Amendment was more about militia

01:07:04.216 --> 01:07:05.914
<v Riley Bowman>and this collective right, right?

01:07:06.204 --> 01:07:11.966
<v Riley Bowman>And we had to have this Heller decision, this famous Heller decision to really make that distinction.

01:07:11.966 --> 01:07:15.896
<v Riley Bowman>No, we are, this is still an individual right that we're talking about here.

01:07:15.896 --> 01:07:20.266
<v Riley Bowman>But before we get to that, let's talk now about the Colfax Massacre and United

01:07:20.266 --> 01:07:22.056
<v Riley Bowman>States versus Crookshake.

01:07:22.376 --> 01:07:25.175
<v Riley Bowman>This is in the 1870s, Jacob.

01:07:26.301 --> 01:07:33.035
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is a massive setback because the context here is you basically have

01:07:34.336 --> 01:07:38.984
<v Jacob Paulsen>a group of free black men defending a church

01:07:40.596 --> 01:07:43.766
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's – it's all part of an election drama thing.

01:07:43.766 --> 01:07:49.976
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so you have a white militia that kind of starts to march on the church and the black free men.

01:07:51.496 --> 01:07:55.412
<v Jacob Paulsen>Back then we called them free men. We're trying to clarify that they are, in fact, not slaves.

01:07:56.010 --> 01:07:59.936
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, they defend that church. And

01:08:02.616 --> 01:08:05.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>The conflict kind of ends in a surrender where the black dudes are like,

01:08:05.546 --> 01:08:08.356
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, okay, we'll put the guns down kind of thing.

01:08:08.885 --> 01:08:11.671
<v Jacob Paulsen>And after they surrender, a bunch of them are slaughtered. They're just shot dead.

01:08:12.914 --> 01:08:19.456
<v Jacob Paulsen>So a local jury basically convicts these dudes.

01:08:19.920 --> 01:08:23.438
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, it goes through a process. They were convicted. But then there's some

01:08:23.438 --> 01:08:28.860
<v Jacob Paulsen>appeals and it goes all the way up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court overturns

01:08:29.127 --> 01:08:33.978
<v Jacob Paulsen>their convictions and says, nope, they're good. And I've not read that decision.

01:08:33.978 --> 01:08:34.913
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't know all the details.

01:08:35.423 --> 01:08:39.588
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it's a massive failure because what it basically did is it said,

01:08:39.588 --> 01:08:42.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, we're not changing the fact that you have these rights.

01:08:42.938 --> 01:08:47.185
<v Jacob Paulsen>And these rights exist, but we are going to basically stop enforcing them.

01:08:48.137 --> 01:08:52.032
<v Jacob Paulsen>We're going to stop backing you up when you try and exercise these rights.

01:08:52.468 --> 01:08:59.758
<v Jacob Paulsen>It really kind of set up the future several decades of Ku Klux Klan

01:09:00.758 --> 01:09:05.838
<v Jacob Paulsen>activity and really put the African-American community in a very vulnerable

01:09:05.838 --> 01:09:09.801
<v Jacob Paulsen>spot because they had no legal recourse when their rights weren't recognized.

01:09:09.963 --> 01:09:15.278
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Hey, before, I got some commentary on that. We got Project 1868 commenting

01:09:15.618 --> 01:09:19.818
<v Riley Bowman>right now on YouTube saying, two comments, one man with one gun can control

01:09:19.818 --> 01:09:22.624
<v Riley Bowman>100 men without guns. Touché. Very true.

01:09:22.769 --> 01:09:23.436
<v Jacob Paulsen>Depends on what gun.

01:09:24.232 --> 01:09:28.398
<v Riley Bowman>Fair enough, but it's a great point. But then he says in a follow-up comment,

01:09:28.398 --> 01:09:30.234
<v Riley Bowman>for obvious reasons, I love the 14th Amendment.

01:09:30.379 --> 01:09:37.918
<v Riley Bowman>Ratified in 1868, says Project 1868. So I'm glad you're joining us here today, Project 1868.

01:09:38.298 --> 01:09:39.283
<v Riley Bowman>Thank you for your comments.

01:09:41.355 --> 01:09:47.635
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, this Crookshank case, Jacob, is, as you mentioned, a terrible ruling, a big step back.

01:09:48.355 --> 01:09:55.682
<v Riley Bowman>The key to this ruling is essentially the Supreme Court said that things like the Second Amendment,

01:09:57.592 --> 01:10:03.495
<v Riley Bowman>only apply to Congress or the federal government being able,

01:10:03.495 --> 01:10:10.513
<v Riley Bowman>being restrained from restricting those rights and that it didn't apply to states or individuals.

01:10:10.850 --> 01:10:15.761
<v Riley Bowman>And that was the key difference here is that essentially these men that murdered,

01:10:16.022 --> 01:10:18.037
<v Riley Bowman>that massacred these black men,

01:10:18.246 --> 01:10:22.222
<v Riley Bowman>these white men that massacred these black men in the Colfax Massacre.

01:10:24.655 --> 01:10:28.126
<v Riley Bowman>They were just a loose private group of militia.

01:10:28.457 --> 01:10:31.675
<v Riley Bowman>They weren't a part of any government. They weren't part of the state.

01:10:31.675 --> 01:10:37.645
<v Riley Bowman>They weren't part of any official organization. They were just a private group

01:10:37.645 --> 01:10:41.122
<v Riley Bowman>of white men, militia that did this act.

01:10:41.563 --> 01:10:46.579
<v Riley Bowman>And so the reason the Supreme Court essentially overturned their convictions,

01:10:47.026 --> 01:10:49.348
<v Riley Bowman>was because they're like, hey.

01:10:51.542 --> 01:10:55.095
<v Riley Bowman>These were private individuals acting against these other private individuals.

01:10:55.095 --> 01:10:58.145
<v Riley Bowman>And the Second Amendment in this case, we're talking about on the Second Amendment

01:10:58.145 --> 01:11:03.367
<v Riley Bowman>issues here, don't apply because that only really applies at the federal level.

01:11:04.927 --> 01:11:07.363
<v Riley Bowman>Now, this came from, I had to do a little digging on this, Jacob,

01:11:07.363 --> 01:11:09.084
<v Riley Bowman>because I was like, this is really strange to me.

01:11:10.175 --> 01:11:15.903
<v Riley Bowman>And so there's actually an earlier case in 1833. This was not a Second Amendment

01:11:15.903 --> 01:11:21.315
<v Riley Bowman>case, but was a case that was dealing with some other Bill of Rights issues.

01:11:21.976 --> 01:11:27.653
<v Riley Bowman>And in the Barron v. Baltimore case of 1833, that case established that the

01:11:27.653 --> 01:11:32.053
<v Riley Bowman>Bill of Rights only restrains the federal governments, not state governments.

01:11:32.773 --> 01:11:36.263
<v Riley Bowman>Okay so the theory was that the bill of rights was added specifically because

01:11:36.263 --> 01:11:41.933
<v Riley Bowman>people feared a powerful new federal government but states still had their own

01:11:41.933 --> 01:11:45.422
<v Riley Bowman>constitutions to govern and police themselves,

01:11:46.124 --> 01:11:51.685
<v Riley Bowman>and so that was kind of and this became sort of this new interpretation of,

01:11:52.693 --> 01:11:59.873
<v Riley Bowman>and the i mean again we're talking 1833 now up to 18 what 70 something um 1873

01:11:59.873 --> 01:12:06.767
<v Riley Bowman>1876 okay So this is the interpretation now at this time in the federal court system is that,

01:12:07.434 --> 01:12:09.129
<v Riley Bowman>hey, Bill of Rights, Second Amendment.

01:12:10.853 --> 01:12:12.013
<v Riley Bowman>That's a federal thing.

01:12:12.013 --> 01:12:16.385
<v Riley Bowman>We're talking about a state or an individual matter. That doesn't really apply.

01:12:16.716 --> 01:12:20.130
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's where you start to see the beginning, this creeping in of,

01:12:20.780 --> 01:12:23.020
<v Riley Bowman>well, that's not talking about individual rights.

01:12:23.868 --> 01:12:24.274
<v Riley Bowman>No.

01:12:24.489 --> 01:12:26.224
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yeah.

01:12:26.753 --> 01:12:28.186
<v Riley Bowman>And that becomes a...

01:12:29.010 --> 01:12:32.573
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, it sounds crazy to us today, right? Yeah. Like we hear that and we're like, what?

01:12:32.873 --> 01:12:36.233
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Like, you know, the Bill of Rights is not enforced at the state level?

01:12:36.233 --> 01:12:37.201
<v Jacob Paulsen>What are you talking about?

01:12:37.642 --> 01:12:41.193
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Because it's about sovereignty and the nature of, you know,

01:12:41.193 --> 01:12:42.663
<v Jacob Paulsen>kind of how that's evolved over time.

01:12:43.372 --> 01:12:47.233
<v Riley Bowman>It wasn't until the McDonald versus Chicago case, 134 years later,

01:12:47.233 --> 01:12:54.326
<v Riley Bowman>that this was fixed. You know, that was specifically an individual versus a city in that case.

01:12:54.854 --> 01:13:02.923
<v Riley Bowman>So for that ruling to then say, no, we're not just talking about federal government

01:13:02.923 --> 01:13:04.461
<v Riley Bowman>or Congress being restrained.

01:13:04.716 --> 01:13:07.491
<v Riley Bowman>We'll come to that here. We'll give it its own time as well.

01:13:07.996 --> 01:13:12.113
<v Riley Bowman>Let's now turn to the National Firearms Act 1934. There's not a whole lot that happens.

01:13:12.893 --> 01:13:15.563
<v Riley Bowman>There's probably a few things here and there, but as far as significant cases

01:13:15.563 --> 01:13:19.883
<v Riley Bowman>or events, We don't see a whole lot from this point forward until we get to

01:13:19.883 --> 01:13:22.091
<v Riley Bowman>1934 in the National Firearms Act.

01:13:22.677 --> 01:13:30.063
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, 1934. So this is Prohibition era, right, time, and kind of the rise of

01:13:30.063 --> 01:13:33.233
<v Jacob Paulsen>mobsters and gangsters in American society, right?

01:13:33.233 --> 01:13:39.458
<v Jacob Paulsen>People who are bootlegging and kind of enforcing their own rules.

01:13:40.143 --> 01:13:46.092
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the U.S. government decides they've got to take some action to try and

01:13:46.540 --> 01:13:50.405
<v Jacob Paulsen>minimize the potential damage that these groups can do.

01:13:51.033 --> 01:13:54.934
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so they look at the types of guns and things they're using and say,

01:13:55.462 --> 01:14:03.123
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, let's regulate the tools that only these mobster-type groups can afford

01:14:03.123 --> 01:14:06.027
<v Jacob Paulsen>and use, and let's manage that.

01:14:07.594 --> 01:14:14.242
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And so, you know, we come up with this legislation, the National Firearms Act of 1934.

01:14:16.858 --> 01:14:17.712
<v Riley Bowman>And let me say this, Jacob,

01:14:19.773 --> 01:14:21.212
<v Riley Bowman>the NRA was a part of this.

01:14:22.024 --> 01:14:26.628
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes. Yeah. By a part of this, you mean they supported it?

01:14:26.628 --> 01:14:29.448
<v Riley Bowman>Very much so. And not only that, but the president, I think it was the president

01:14:29.448 --> 01:14:34.510
<v Riley Bowman>of the NRA at that time, was key, you know, and I think testified on behalf of this.

01:14:35.207 --> 01:14:40.258
<v Riley Bowman>And specifically, I think, advised on this legislation from the standpoint of

01:14:40.258 --> 01:14:44.988
<v Riley Bowman>they knew, they couldn't just say, we're going to take away these guns,

01:14:45.522 --> 01:14:47.020
<v Riley Bowman>like these whole classes of guns.

01:14:47.798 --> 01:14:53.313
<v Riley Bowman>And so the way they knew they had to frame it was through the tax,

01:14:53.481 --> 01:14:56.418
<v Riley Bowman>the tax stamp, the $200 tax stamp that we're all familiar with today.

01:14:56.418 --> 01:14:57.347
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's a financial bill.

01:14:57.533 --> 01:15:02.568
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. So Congress didn't have the right by the Constitution.

01:15:02.568 --> 01:15:07.947
<v Riley Bowman>They didn't have the authority to just say, pick these guns away. Okay.

01:15:08.400 --> 01:15:12.667
<v Riley Bowman>What Congress has the authority to do though, was pass a tax.

01:15:13.340 --> 01:15:17.208
<v Riley Bowman>And so they didn't totally make illegal these classes of firearms.

01:15:17.208 --> 01:15:21.901
<v Riley Bowman>They just said, Hey, to get these guns, you have to go through a process and pay a tax.

01:15:22.238 --> 01:15:26.377
<v Riley Bowman>And we have the authority to do that tax. And therefore we have the authority to do this.

01:15:26.830 --> 01:15:31.172
<v Riley Bowman>And that's where the NRA and the president of NRA at that time came into play.

01:15:32.298 --> 01:15:36.210
<v Riley Bowman>Was actually saying, here, here's how you can get this done.

01:15:37.180 --> 01:15:43.496
<v Riley Bowman>You know, legally and constitutionally within the bounds of the authority of Congress.

01:15:44.291 --> 01:15:48.328
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's an interesting part of history. Now, there was not a lot of pushback

01:15:48.328 --> 01:15:50.079
<v Riley Bowman>on the National Firearms Act at that time.

01:15:50.235 --> 01:15:55.233
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, it went through Congress without much pushback. And for those who aren't

01:15:55.634 --> 01:15:57.808
<v Jacob Paulsen>following, and today we often just refer to this as the NFA.

01:15:58.348 --> 01:16:03.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is the law, Title II, that established what a Class III weapon is.

01:16:04.057 --> 01:16:09.608
<v Jacob Paulsen>And these class three weapons were, again, not banned. They just required a

01:16:10.008 --> 01:16:11.702
<v Jacob Paulsen>purchase of a tax stamp to acquire.

01:16:12.277 --> 01:16:15.298
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so these are things that you're familiar with today. Obviously,

01:16:15.298 --> 01:16:19.988
<v Jacob Paulsen>suppressors are part of this list. Sawed off or short barrel rifle shotguns.

01:16:21.708 --> 01:16:29.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then fully automatic machine guns. And so bear in mind that $200 then,

01:16:29.894 --> 01:16:32.239
<v Jacob Paulsen>according to my little quick Google search I just did on my phone,

01:16:32.616 --> 01:16:35.178
<v Jacob Paulsen>is about the equivalent of $5,000 today.

01:16:35.178 --> 01:16:35.565
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:16:35.716 --> 01:16:41.010
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is you coming up with five grand to pay a tax stamp to be able to acquire that tool.

01:16:42.892 --> 01:16:47.586
<v Riley Bowman>Which there's some irony in that because you'd think that some of those gangsters

01:16:47.586 --> 01:16:50.296
<v Riley Bowman>and mobsters, especially the

01:16:50.296 --> 01:16:52.796
<v Riley Bowman>more organized ones, would probably have the resources to pull that off.

01:16:52.796 --> 01:16:54.216
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, probably not a problem.

01:16:55.056 --> 01:16:59.866
<v Riley Bowman>Or they would just, because they're criminals anyway, would just not abide by

01:16:59.866 --> 01:17:03.596
<v Riley Bowman>the law in the first place. But anyway, because since criminals follow laws

01:17:03.596 --> 01:17:05.896
<v Riley Bowman>all the time. But here is one other thing.

01:17:07.016 --> 01:17:10.205
<v Riley Bowman>I brought the NRA into this discussion. There's one other thing that's important

01:17:10.448 --> 01:17:14.640
<v Riley Bowman>to point out. And that is that the NRA was responsible for making sure that

01:17:14.825 --> 01:17:17.587
<v Riley Bowman>handguns were not included in the NFA.

01:17:17.918 --> 01:17:19.967
<v Riley Bowman>The handguns were originally included in that.

01:17:20.583 --> 01:17:21.336
<v Jacob Paulsen>To the first purpose.

01:17:21.336 --> 01:17:25.576
<v Riley Bowman>Understand that the context of society at this time is that guns are still a

01:17:25.576 --> 01:17:29.104
<v Riley Bowman>very popular thing. Most households still own one or several.

01:17:30.156 --> 01:17:36.756
<v Riley Bowman>But they don't typically own them in the context that we think of them a lot

01:17:36.756 --> 01:17:40.186
<v Riley Bowman>of times today as far as like for personal defense especially.

01:17:40.186 --> 01:17:42.067
<v Riley Bowman>That's not really a thing at this time.

01:17:42.305 --> 01:17:45.476
<v Riley Bowman>People aren't really, like, I think there's some instances of it,

01:17:45.476 --> 01:17:50.156
<v Riley Bowman>but it's just not as common that people are packing around a revolver,

01:17:50.496 --> 01:17:53.329
<v Riley Bowman>or I guess it could be 1911 at this time, but those certainly existed.

01:17:53.712 --> 01:17:57.694
<v Riley Bowman>They're not packing around a handgun as part of their normal day-to-day lives.

01:17:58.135 --> 01:18:01.786
<v Riley Bowman>Most households, they think, hey, I have my guns, I've got my rifle,

01:18:01.908 --> 01:18:07.870
<v Riley Bowman>my hunting rifle, I got my hunting shotgun, I have my .22, I got what I need, right?

01:18:08.265 --> 01:18:12.566
<v Riley Bowman>And so So most people did not see the National Firearms Act as being something

01:18:12.566 --> 01:18:15.304
<v Riley Bowman>that was coming after them or coming after their guns.

01:18:15.641 --> 01:18:18.840
<v Riley Bowman>They didn't own machine guns. They didn't own short-barreled shotguns because

01:18:19.141 --> 01:18:20.456
<v Riley Bowman>who hunts with a short-barreled shotgun?

01:18:20.456 --> 01:18:23.472
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, those were expensive firearms. I mean, think Tommy gun.

01:18:24.012 --> 01:18:26.346
<v Jacob Paulsen>Think Fuliato submachine gun.

01:18:26.346 --> 01:18:27.756
<v Riley Bowman>They weren't that expensive then.

01:18:28.476 --> 01:18:29.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, relatively.

01:18:29.606 --> 01:18:33.926
<v Riley Bowman>But I think it's more about the people didn't see a practical use for them.

01:18:34.779 --> 01:18:39.085
<v Riley Bowman>You know and so why would i why would i have a short-barreled rifle why would

01:18:39.085 --> 01:18:42.965
<v Riley Bowman>i hunt with a short-barreled rifle that doesn't make any sense that just in

01:18:42.965 --> 01:18:47.515
<v Riley Bowman>you know reduces my my velocity is going to make my hunting rifle less effective and so forth,

01:18:48.305 --> 01:18:52.705
<v Riley Bowman>but handguns were part of that because also again gangsters mobsters were using

01:18:52.705 --> 01:18:56.345
<v Riley Bowman>handguns also so that was another one of the things they were going after but

01:18:56.345 --> 01:18:59.943
<v Riley Bowman>the nra did win on that point to say hey there are still,

01:19:00.803 --> 01:19:05.935
<v Riley Bowman>legitimate uses where citizens have handguns for personal defense and they stripped

01:19:05.935 --> 01:19:09.515
<v Riley Bowman>that out of the nfa thank goodness thank goodness if we were still having to

01:19:09.515 --> 01:19:13.305
<v Riley Bowman>fight the nfa fight today on handguns i would be,

01:19:14.118 --> 01:19:19.485
<v Riley Bowman>so that's the nfa that's how it came to be and it didn't have much pushback

01:19:19.485 --> 01:19:24.103
<v Riley Bowman>against it most people were in support of it sadly we regret that now for sure don't we.

01:19:25.031 --> 01:19:32.119
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well and as recently as you know in the last 12 months, we've seen the $200 tax stamp be removed.

01:19:32.363 --> 01:19:39.184
<v Jacob Paulsen>So as of January 1st, 2026, we've reduced the tax on NFA items from $200 to $0.

01:19:39.596 --> 01:19:45.665
<v Jacob Paulsen>And one of the biggest pro-gun efforts happening today is the initiative to

01:19:46.065 --> 01:19:50.555
<v Jacob Paulsen>either abolish the NFA completely or at very least to remove suppressors from

01:19:50.555 --> 01:19:52.593
<v Jacob Paulsen>it. So those are hot topics right now.

01:19:54.039 --> 01:20:00.099
<v Riley Bowman>Now, one thing that the NFA did set us up for was a case known as United States v. Miller.

01:20:01.505 --> 01:20:09.387
<v Riley Bowman>And the Miller case was used for anti-gunners, and still is today, as their evidence,

01:20:11.714 --> 01:20:13.621
<v Riley Bowman>for a lot of different things over the years.

01:20:13.621 --> 01:20:14.691
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, made a mess.

01:20:14.691 --> 01:20:19.318
<v Riley Bowman>And it's important to understand what went on with the Miller case.

01:20:19.580 --> 01:20:26.431
<v Riley Bowman>Okay so essentially you had a situation this man uh got caught with a short-barreled

01:20:26.431 --> 01:20:30.481
<v Riley Bowman>shotgun okay just a little it's probably one of those situations right you know

01:20:30.481 --> 01:20:31.101
<v Riley Bowman>like you know that by you know,

01:20:32.815 --> 01:20:36.691
<v Riley Bowman>the nfa law you're you're right you're excuse me your shotgun's got to have

01:20:36.691 --> 01:20:41.941
<v Riley Bowman>a barrel no less than 18 and a half inches right and by golly if you accidentally

01:20:41.941 --> 01:20:46.637
<v Riley Bowman>took a little too much off that shotgun and you're 18.49

01:20:47.060 --> 01:20:48.512
<v Riley Bowman>inches well you're in violation of the law right,

01:20:49.162 --> 01:20:52.854
<v Riley Bowman>so you got a gentleman he's caught with a short barrel shotgun um he's convicted

01:20:53.167 --> 01:20:54.224
<v Riley Bowman>he takes it up to supreme court,

01:20:55.437 --> 01:20:59.408
<v Riley Bowman>um but something about that case for some reason he didn't show up and defend

01:20:59.588 --> 01:21:01.891
<v Riley Bowman>like there was there was no defense to this case yeah.

01:21:01.891 --> 01:21:04.400
<v Jacob Paulsen>He just no showed yeah probably was in mexico by then

01:21:04.562 --> 01:21:08.405
<v Riley Bowman>You know so so that's the important thing about miller that you need to understand

01:21:08.748 --> 01:21:13.565
<v Riley Bowman>is that you end up with this Miller decision that was then used as,

01:21:14.441 --> 01:21:22.081
<v Riley Bowman>for other court, you know, used as case law for other future federal court cases for decades.

01:21:22.702 --> 01:21:29.691
<v Riley Bowman>And it was a case that had zero defense. Nobody showed up. Nobody argued against it.

01:21:31.981 --> 01:21:38.571
<v Riley Bowman>It just, it got pushed through. And so that's how the Miller case ends up being

01:21:38.571 --> 01:21:45.097
<v Riley Bowman>this decisive, for several decades, court case about clarifying.

01:21:45.515 --> 01:21:50.090
<v Riley Bowman>So part of what that had to deal with, too, was there was a tie-in with malicious service.

01:21:52.191 --> 01:21:57.204
<v Riley Bowman>And so, again, this removal of individuals from the picture of,

01:21:57.204 --> 01:22:03.656
<v Riley Bowman>you know, the Second Amendment picture, but, you know, it's got to be relevant to militia service.

01:22:04.428 --> 01:22:07.701
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's how this came to be, this Miller decision.

01:22:07.997 --> 01:22:11.774
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, and this is not necessarily the U.S. Supreme Court saying,

01:22:11.774 --> 01:22:16.054
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, the shotgun has no application of militia service. The Second Amendment's about the militia.

01:22:16.124 --> 01:22:20.907
<v Jacob Paulsen>And therefore, what happens here is there's an appeal made.

01:22:21.318 --> 01:22:23.096
<v Jacob Paulsen>The U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

01:22:23.519 --> 01:22:28.332
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the case is basically what the prosecution wrote.

01:22:28.853 --> 01:22:32.744
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, again, no defense, right? So the state comes and says, well,

01:22:33.620 --> 01:22:37.154
<v Jacob Paulsen>you should uphold this guy's conviction because we arrested him on the shotgun.

01:22:37.154 --> 01:22:40.094
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the shotgun is not needed for the militia. And the Second Amendment says

01:22:40.094 --> 01:22:41.683
<v Jacob Paulsen>militia, so therefore we should win.

01:22:42.129 --> 01:22:44.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the Supreme Court says, okay, well, what's your side of the story,

01:22:44.174 --> 01:22:48.638
<v Jacob Paulsen>Mr. Oh, wait, you're not here. Okay, well then, you know, it's back the gavel. That's the deal.

01:22:49.204 --> 01:22:54.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so this is used, yes, by anti-gunners, you know, up until and including

01:22:54.314 --> 01:22:58.774
<v Jacob Paulsen>today to say, hey, here's a U.S. Supreme Court decision where the decision was

01:22:58.774 --> 01:23:01.216
<v Jacob Paulsen>all about what's appropriate for militia use.

01:23:01.820 --> 01:23:06.174
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so, you know, does a militia need this or not? And clearly this is indicative

01:23:06.174 --> 01:23:07.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>that it's not about an individual. It's about a militia.

01:23:09.783 --> 01:23:13.672
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. And as we've already established in this episode so far,

01:23:13.823 --> 01:23:17.354
<v Riley Bowman>as we've given numerous examples going back,

01:23:18.021 --> 01:23:27.320
<v Riley Bowman>to hundreds and hundreds of years where it's a recognized individual's right to have and bear arms.

01:23:28.708 --> 01:23:29.810
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it does self-correct.

01:23:29.973 --> 01:23:35.116
<v Riley Bowman>It does. It does. Of course, Heller, huge deal. McDonald's, another big deal.

01:23:35.940 --> 01:23:38.576
<v Riley Bowman>Brewing, huge deal. We're getting to that. But first, we've got a couple other

01:23:38.576 --> 01:23:43.604
<v Riley Bowman>things. Let's talk now about the civil rights era. The Mulford Act, 1967, Jacob.

01:23:44.421 --> 01:23:48.044
<v Riley Bowman>You had California ban the public carry of loaded firearms.

01:23:48.264 --> 01:23:50.807
<v Jacob Paulsen>Shocker. Yeah, right. California, right here.

01:23:50.935 --> 01:23:54.706
<v Riley Bowman>Now, this was in direct response to, you had a lot of civil unrest at that time.

01:23:54.706 --> 01:23:58.713
<v Riley Bowman>And the Black Panthers became this huge movement, this huge organization.

01:23:59.926 --> 01:24:03.467
<v Riley Bowman>And the Black Panthers started doing these armed neighborhood patrols.

01:24:05.167 --> 01:24:08.145
<v Riley Bowman>Which I would say, by the way, they had every right to do. Okay.

01:24:08.389 --> 01:24:11.778
<v Riley Bowman>Just, I would say every American has a right to do. If they decide that that's

01:24:11.778 --> 01:24:14.498
<v Riley Bowman>something, you know, that you got to do something, that you got to take action

01:24:14.498 --> 01:24:15.477
<v Riley Bowman>to protect your neighborhood.

01:24:16.248 --> 01:24:18.617
<v Riley Bowman>You want to have an armed patrol? I'm all for that. Okay.

01:24:19.424 --> 01:24:24.515
<v Riley Bowman>But the Californians didn't like these armed neighborhood patrols.

01:24:24.724 --> 01:24:30.118
<v Riley Bowman>And so they signed the legislation. In fact, this was backed by the NRA again.

01:24:30.118 --> 01:24:30.388
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes.

01:24:30.768 --> 01:24:34.471
<v Riley Bowman>And signed by Governor Ronald Reagan.

01:24:35.649 --> 01:24:41.378
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, but this was specifically targeting these Black Panther armed neighborhood

01:24:41.378 --> 01:24:45.468
<v Riley Bowman>patrols to keep them from being able to do that because it's just,

01:24:45.788 --> 01:24:50.469
<v Riley Bowman>this just banned outright a public carry of loaded firearms, period.

01:24:50.974 --> 01:24:54.968
<v Riley Bowman>So it did go across the board, but I think the way this was viewed is,

01:24:54.968 --> 01:24:59.308
<v Riley Bowman>well, not many people generally carry loaded gun publicly, but these Black Panther

01:24:59.648 --> 01:25:02.270
<v Riley Bowman>folks are doing it in their little neighborhood patrols.

01:25:02.496 --> 01:25:07.854
<v Riley Bowman>So what can we do to go after that? Let's just ban outright the public carry of loaded firearms.

01:25:09.848 --> 01:25:13.299
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in modern language, we would address this as open carry.

01:25:13.537 --> 01:25:14.328
<v Riley Bowman>Right, exactly.

01:25:14.328 --> 01:25:21.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>So to be clear, this was, in fact, we've seen, what's the 2026 case? Barrett v. Bonta.

01:25:22.546 --> 01:25:26.958
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yep. So that's a 2026 federal district court ruling that pointed back to this

01:25:26.958 --> 01:25:29.576
<v Jacob Paulsen>law from 19, what was it? 67.

01:25:30.064 --> 01:25:32.299
<v Jacob Paulsen>To justify the ban on open carry.

01:25:32.792 --> 01:25:43.038
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, yes, this is an open carry ban specifically targeting these Black Panther neighborhood patrols.

01:25:44.316 --> 01:25:49.191
<v Riley Bowman>You're probably picking up on a couple of things, some hints that there are,

01:25:49.959 --> 01:25:54.220
<v Riley Bowman>pluses and minuses on both sides of the aisle, I guess you could say, as far as,

01:25:55.971 --> 01:26:00.640
<v Riley Bowman>on the conservative side and more liberal side or Republican versus Democrat.

01:26:00.640 --> 01:26:05.480
<v Riley Bowman>I don't care how you want to phrase it, but you've got mistakes made on all

01:26:05.480 --> 01:26:10.460
<v Riley Bowman>sides, on all sorts of issues throughout history with regards to even Second

01:26:10.460 --> 01:26:11.818
<v Riley Bowman>Amendment issues. All right.

01:26:13.260 --> 01:26:19.400
<v Riley Bowman>The Gun Control Act of 1968 was the next piece. And this sort of is kind of

01:26:19.400 --> 01:26:24.868
<v Riley Bowman>that next step up from the NFA. Right.

01:26:26.602 --> 01:26:33.890
<v Riley Bowman>And some of the kind of catalysts to the Gun Control Act of 1968 were things

01:26:33.890 --> 01:26:37.940
<v Riley Bowman>like the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy.

01:26:38.329 --> 01:26:45.249
<v Riley Bowman>Okay those happen close you know like boom boom uh in in timeline in history and uh people are like,

01:26:46.056 --> 01:26:48.800
<v Riley Bowman>dang like we got to do something about these people just running out with guns

01:26:48.800 --> 01:26:53.980
<v Riley Bowman>and assassinating people right and so that's where the gun control act came to be and it.

01:26:55.187 --> 01:26:57.627
<v Jacob Paulsen>You note that most of these things we're talking about when we get into American

01:26:57.627 --> 01:27:01.967
<v Jacob Paulsen>time, post-U.S. Constitution, we have very few actual federal laws.

01:27:02.627 --> 01:27:08.103
<v Jacob Paulsen>We really had the NFA, now the Gun Control Act 1968, and then we're going to have FOPA in 1986.

01:27:08.589 --> 01:27:10.647
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we just don't have a lot of – most of it's about court cases.

01:27:10.647 --> 01:27:13.112
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's how most of these things get sorted out. This is a big one.

01:27:13.483 --> 01:27:16.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>And what it does – in terms of what Gun Control Act actually does,

01:27:17.181 --> 01:27:18.937
<v Jacob Paulsen>it kind of establishes two core things.

01:27:18.937 --> 01:27:21.747
<v Jacob Paulsen>First off, it creates the Federal Firearm Licensing Program,

01:27:21.747 --> 01:27:26.307
<v Jacob Paulsen>the FFL program. So it establishes the idea of gun dealers, you know,

01:27:26.307 --> 01:27:30.117
<v Jacob Paulsen>that we're going to have people come to us and get a license in order to be

01:27:30.117 --> 01:27:32.570
<v Jacob Paulsen>engaged in the business of selling firearms.

01:27:32.819 --> 01:27:32.967
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:27:33.287 --> 01:27:34.487
<v Jacob Paulsen>Something that's already been sorted today.

01:27:34.627 --> 01:27:37.347
<v Riley Bowman>Because up to that point, you could still mail order firearms.

01:27:37.347 --> 01:27:40.505
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. Yeah. It's all good. Like they could be, they were in the Sears catalog probably.

01:27:40.767 --> 01:27:41.557
<v Riley Bowman>Absolutely.

01:27:41.557 --> 01:27:45.367
<v Jacob Paulsen>If Sears was around, I assume they were. Yeah. So, so yeah, now we're going

01:27:45.367 --> 01:27:46.037
<v Jacob Paulsen>to like, oh, no, no, no, no.

01:27:46.127 --> 01:27:49.677
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, like, I mean, we're not going to regulate individual, like,

01:27:49.677 --> 01:27:53.346
<v Jacob Paulsen>hey, give a gun to your buddy or your neighbor or sell a gun to your friend.

01:27:53.666 --> 01:27:56.944
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we are going to regulate people who are going to be in the business.

01:27:57.286 --> 01:28:00.520
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that gun store, we are going to regulate what the gun store can do.

01:28:01.077 --> 01:28:06.005
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we create a system to license gun dealers, and then we regulate those dealers.

01:28:06.412 --> 01:28:11.816
<v Jacob Paulsen>We also create a classification of people who are prohibited from buying and possessing guns.

01:28:12.307 --> 01:28:14.567
<v Jacob Paulsen>People who are mentally ill or have been convicted of felony,

01:28:14.567 --> 01:28:15.270
<v Jacob Paulsen>all these kinds of things.

01:28:15.380 --> 01:28:18.697
<v Jacob Paulsen>So we create all those requirements. Now, we don't really have any way to enforce

01:28:18.697 --> 01:28:22.956
<v Jacob Paulsen>them other than just tell the FFL, hey, you can't sell guns to these people knowingly.

01:28:23.194 --> 01:28:27.803
<v Riley Bowman>Yep, exactly. So that's essentially what happens with the Gun Control Act of 1968.

01:28:30.444 --> 01:28:35.227
<v Riley Bowman>And that sets us up for a contrasting piece of legislation known as the Firearm,

01:28:36.487 --> 01:28:38.960
<v Riley Bowman>Owners Protection Act of 1986.

01:28:41.907 --> 01:28:42.368
<v Riley Bowman>Yep. And so...

01:28:43.796 --> 01:28:52.066
<v Riley Bowman>Some of what happened with the dealer registration and licensing in 1968 was

01:28:52.066 --> 01:28:56.216
<v Riley Bowman>there was a whole bunch of regulations or rules for how dealers were to conduct business,

01:28:57.615 --> 01:29:01.926
<v Riley Bowman>which turned out, and this is no surprise to really anybody,

01:29:01.926 --> 01:29:07.397
<v Riley Bowman>I'm sure, but the government started to use some of those regulations to really go after dealers.

01:29:08.331 --> 01:29:09.202
<v Jacob Paulsen>Persecute.

01:29:09.388 --> 01:29:15.831
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, there you go. Persecute and just, yeah. So it made things really difficult as a dealer, right?

01:29:15.994 --> 01:29:20.366
<v Riley Bowman>And so the Fire Emblem Owners Protection Act helped roll back some of that and

01:29:20.366 --> 01:29:23.378
<v Riley Bowman>make things a little bit less crazy on the dealer side.

01:29:23.836 --> 01:29:28.396
<v Riley Bowman>The other big thing, though, was that interstate transportation of firearms,

01:29:28.396 --> 01:29:32.823
<v Riley Bowman>I think that was also part of the Gun Control Act of 1968, that became,

01:29:35.319 --> 01:29:38.523
<v Riley Bowman>I don't know what the exact limits were, but basically you couldn't.

01:29:39.795 --> 01:29:41.391
<v Riley Bowman>What was the law? Do you know on that?

01:29:41.391 --> 01:29:42.466
<v Jacob Paulsen>Article 926A.

01:29:42.797 --> 01:29:43.145
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:29:43.267 --> 01:29:49.311
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. So the way we utilize or think about this as it applies to us as individuals

01:29:49.311 --> 01:29:50.901
<v Jacob Paulsen>today is not the way it was intended back then.

01:29:50.901 --> 01:29:56.101
<v Jacob Paulsen>This was really about the mass transportation of guns from one state to another.

01:29:56.101 --> 01:29:59.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if guns were being manufactured in New York or Massachusetts or Connecticut,

01:29:59.891 --> 01:30:02.056
<v Jacob Paulsen>which is where most guns were manufactured back then,

01:30:02.861 --> 01:30:08.063
<v Jacob Paulsen>but we wanted to ship those to Florida to a gun dealer so they could be sold

01:30:08.371 --> 01:30:12.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>to consumers, this was a problem at the time because all Florida's laws might

01:30:12.931 --> 01:30:14.111
<v Jacob Paulsen>be different than Connecticut's laws.

01:30:14.111 --> 01:30:18.571
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so the part of FOPA was to step in and say, Hey, we need to create some

01:30:18.571 --> 01:30:23.796
<v Jacob Paulsen>federal allowance that firearms can be trans. It's, it's part of a commerce bill.

01:30:24.541 --> 01:30:28.231
<v Jacob Paulsen>This particular amendment to the fire motor protection act is part of a U S

01:30:28.231 --> 01:30:30.000
<v Jacob Paulsen>department of commerce and transportation bill.

01:30:30.443 --> 01:30:34.491
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it established that part of free commerce is the ability to move guns

01:30:34.491 --> 01:30:35.329
<v Jacob Paulsen>from one place to another.

01:30:35.505 --> 01:30:40.161
<v Riley Bowman>There we go. That's where we're trying to get to with that. I appreciate your explanation on that.

01:30:40.161 --> 01:30:43.721
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's some other important critical parts of FOPA. In addition to kind of

01:30:43.721 --> 01:30:46.643
<v Jacob Paulsen>pulling back a little bit some of the strenuous requirements on FFLs,

01:30:47.056 --> 01:30:53.161
<v Jacob Paulsen>FOPA also establishes that it's a criminal act for a government, local jurisdiction,

01:30:54.041 --> 01:31:00.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>state, county, whatever governing body or organization to keep a database or

01:31:00.651 --> 01:31:02.224
<v Jacob Paulsen>list of gun owners and their guns.

01:31:02.728 --> 01:31:08.364
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this establishes basically a protection against gun registration.

01:31:09.401 --> 01:31:12.371
<v Jacob Paulsen>Which is really important. And of course, today we see that there are still

01:31:12.371 --> 01:31:15.662
<v Jacob Paulsen>some jurisdictions doing it, but they were doing it prior to 1986.

01:31:15.940 --> 01:31:17.850
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so they kind of keep getting away with doing it.

01:31:18.175 --> 01:31:23.971
<v Jacob Paulsen>But establishing a new database of gun owners and their guns post-1986 is strictly

01:31:23.971 --> 01:31:26.273
<v Jacob Paulsen>prohibited because of the Fire Motor Protection Act.

01:31:28.120 --> 01:31:31.685
<v Riley Bowman>Now, there's this thing called the Hughes Amendment that was a part of that.

01:31:31.685 --> 01:31:33.576
<v Riley Bowman>It was never really intended to be a part of that.

01:31:35.422 --> 01:31:40.085
<v Riley Bowman>Now, understand the Fire Owners Protection Act was rolling back some of the

01:31:40.085 --> 01:31:44.641
<v Riley Bowman>legislation or regulations and laws that were put in place in 1968.

01:31:45.332 --> 01:31:48.635
<v Riley Bowman>And you had certain individuals, especially on the left-leaning side of the

01:31:48.635 --> 01:31:53.715
<v Riley Bowman>aisle, that weren't exactly in favor of doing that because they'd rather just

01:31:53.715 --> 01:31:57.857
<v Riley Bowman>constantly march forward on taking and restricting things more and more, right?

01:31:58.775 --> 01:32:01.895
<v Riley Bowman>So the Hughes Amendment, it's interesting how this came to be.

01:32:01.895 --> 01:32:03.604
<v Riley Bowman>It was thrown in the last minute.

01:32:04.754 --> 01:32:10.875
<v Riley Bowman>And it was done in such a way that, in fact, Mr. Hughes, I don't think he in

01:32:10.875 --> 01:32:12.259
<v Riley Bowman>the end, we actually don't know.

01:32:12.544 --> 01:32:18.789
<v Riley Bowman>Because the whole Fire Emblem Owners Protection Act bill was passed on a voice vote.

01:32:19.690 --> 01:32:24.575
<v Riley Bowman>There was never even a recorded vote. We don't know who voted in what way for

01:32:24.575 --> 01:32:27.160
<v Riley Bowman>or against the FOPA bill. Okay.

01:32:27.845 --> 01:32:30.341
<v Riley Bowman>And the Hughes amendment was slipped right in there at the end.

01:32:31.311 --> 01:32:36.170
<v Riley Bowman>And, and again, like, and there's actually debate today, Jacob,

01:32:37.105 --> 01:32:47.195
<v Riley Bowman>about whether it was truly enough yays versus nays in passage of the BOPA bill

01:32:47.195 --> 01:32:48.568
<v Riley Bowman>along with that Hughes amendment.

01:32:49.525 --> 01:32:54.175
<v Riley Bowman>Because there are those that say that the nays were a lot louder than the, than the eyes.

01:32:54.988 --> 01:32:58.205
<v Jacob Paulsen>They're welcome to uh go write a new piece of legislation to repeal it

01:32:59.452 --> 01:33:04.973
<v Riley Bowman>And it actually was challenged uh in court but came back saying basically like

01:33:05.245 --> 01:33:09.866
<v Riley Bowman>yeah the court basically said hey whatever the um,

01:33:11.915 --> 01:33:16.263
<v Riley Bowman>the the the uh i'm at a loss for the word all of a,

01:33:19.146 --> 01:33:23.156
<v Riley Bowman>whoever certifies the bill we will talk about it whoever certifies the court

01:33:23.156 --> 01:33:26.716
<v Riley Bowman>basically came back and whoever certifies the bill they're like yep it is what

01:33:26.716 --> 01:33:30.356
<v Riley Bowman>it is it's a done deal like it's passed as far as we're concerned and assuming

01:33:30.356 --> 01:33:31.228
<v Riley Bowman>it's signed by the president,

01:33:31.826 --> 01:33:34.961
<v Riley Bowman>so it's a law like there's nothing they can do about it alright Hughes Amendment.

01:33:35.664 --> 01:33:41.782
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's sad it's tragic yep the Hughes Amendment basically freezes the

01:33:43.790 --> 01:33:53.066
<v Jacob Paulsen>the legal sale of newly manufactured, non-semi-automatic, fully automatic firearms,

01:33:53.066 --> 01:33:54.987
<v Jacob Paulsen>machine guns to civilians.

01:33:55.927 --> 01:33:59.068
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's created an interesting environment where

01:34:01.126 --> 01:34:05.558
<v Jacob Paulsen>it's a weird law because it doesn't say you can't buy and sell machine guns.

01:34:06.133 --> 01:34:09.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>It says you can't, as a civilian, non-military, non-law enforcement,

01:34:09.476 --> 01:34:15.235
<v Jacob Paulsen>that you can't buy or sell machine guns that were manufactured post-1986 when this bill was passed.

01:34:15.688 --> 01:34:22.556
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is why a machine gun made in 1985 is a very good thing to own today.

01:34:22.556 --> 01:34:26.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's worth a lot of money because it can still be sold

01:34:28.186 --> 01:34:31.406
<v Jacob Paulsen>as long as you're compliant with the NFA. But it can still be sold,

01:34:31.406 --> 01:34:37.816
<v Jacob Paulsen>transferred among private citizens, whereas a machine gun manufactured in 1987 cannot.

01:34:38.048 --> 01:34:40.539
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's exclusively available for military and law enforcement use.

01:34:40.951 --> 01:34:41.212
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

01:34:42.408 --> 01:34:44.700
<v Riley Bowman>That's the Hughes Amendment. This is what I was trying to say.

01:34:44.851 --> 01:34:48.672
<v Riley Bowman>Certified by the Speaker. They call it the Enrolled Bill Rule.

01:34:48.672 --> 01:34:50.312
<v Riley Bowman>The 11th Circuit ruled this,

01:34:52.419 --> 01:34:57.302
<v Riley Bowman>when this was challenged in court. They upheld the law invoking the Enrolled

01:34:57.302 --> 01:35:01.702
<v Riley Bowman>Bill Rule, saying that once a bill is certified by the Speaker and signed by

01:35:01.702 --> 01:35:06.062
<v Riley Bowman>the President, it's considered law, and the courts won't look behind the legislative

01:35:06.062 --> 01:35:07.211
<v Riley Bowman>process that produced it.

01:35:08.291 --> 01:35:15.162
<v Riley Bowman>So there you go uh the here's the other thing back to the i'm not i'm not the

01:35:15.162 --> 01:35:20.517
<v Riley Bowman>intent is not to make not make this an anti-nra episode at all okay.

01:35:20.858 --> 01:35:22.282
<v Jacob Paulsen>But of interesting note

01:35:22.282 --> 01:35:25.622
<v Riley Bowman>But of interesting note and i know that there are those of you already out there

01:35:25.622 --> 01:35:29.802
<v Riley Bowman>that know some of this you know this back history and backstory but the nra

01:35:29.802 --> 01:35:32.301
<v Riley Bowman>was also on board with the fopa,

01:35:32.857 --> 01:35:37.682
<v Riley Bowman>of course it was rolling back some of the legislation passed in 1968 so that

01:35:37.682 --> 01:35:39.058
<v Riley Bowman>makes sense like yeah we're on board,

01:35:40.056 --> 01:35:44.622
<v Riley Bowman>they were willing it said to and wayne lapierre was involved in this he was

01:35:44.622 --> 01:35:48.342
<v Riley Bowman>a lobbyist at the time for the nra was willing to let the machine gun ban go

01:35:48.342 --> 01:35:51.729
<v Riley Bowman>forward rather than risk the whole reform package,

01:35:52.285 --> 01:35:55.952
<v Riley Bowman>it was just sort of considered to be a risk versus reward you know kind of approach

01:35:55.952 --> 01:35:59.842
<v Riley Bowman>like you know that's a small thing we need these other things these other things

01:35:59.842 --> 01:36:02.456
<v Riley Bowman>are more important it was a strategic play,

01:36:03.326 --> 01:36:06.582
<v Riley Bowman>and so whatever you think of that you can think of that which you will just

01:36:06.582 --> 01:36:09.317
<v Riley Bowman>know that you know the NRA was playing a part in that,

01:36:11.872 --> 01:36:16.452
<v Riley Bowman>so alrighty let's now move to Brady yes okay.

01:36:17.856 --> 01:36:23.803
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is the next big one, and a lot of the Brady Bill was ultimately sunset

01:36:23.803 --> 01:36:25.681
<v Jacob Paulsen>and went out of business, but some of it did not.

01:36:26.227 --> 01:36:32.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is Clinton-era legislation, and the Brady Bill effectively establishes

01:36:33.443 --> 01:36:36.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>two core things as we think of it today.

01:36:36.283 --> 01:36:41.052
<v Jacob Paulsen>The first is the background check system, the NICS system, National Instant

01:36:41.231 --> 01:36:43.863
<v Jacob Paulsen>Crime something. What does it stand for?

01:36:43.863 --> 01:36:46.822
<v Riley Bowman>National Instant Criminal.

01:36:47.274 --> 01:36:50.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>Check system? I don't know.

01:36:50.283 --> 01:36:53.230
<v Riley Bowman>National instant check system, I think. That sounds true.

01:36:53.883 --> 01:36:57.093
<v Jacob Paulsen>So establishes NICs, which is the background check that you undergo when you

01:36:57.093 --> 01:36:58.704
<v Jacob Paulsen>buy a gun from an FFL in this country.

01:36:59.418 --> 01:37:06.363
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it creates that. It also creates a ban on what we think of today as assault

01:37:06.363 --> 01:37:10.403
<v Jacob Paulsen>weapons or what the political rhetoric refers to an assault weapon.

01:37:10.763 --> 01:37:14.123
<v Riley Bowman>That's where we first see, I think, that term really,

01:37:16.131 --> 01:37:16.893
<v Riley Bowman>established.

01:37:16.893 --> 01:37:19.835
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh, yeah. You know, codified. WNWR. Yeah, that's when.

01:37:20.073 --> 01:37:25.924
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yeah, big time. And it also bans high-capacity magazines, as defined by that bill.

01:37:26.823 --> 01:37:31.273
<v Jacob Paulsen>Now, the way the bill is written, though, is it sets up, it goes into effect

01:37:31.273 --> 01:37:35.601
<v Jacob Paulsen>in 1994, and it sets up that the assault weapon, air quotes there,

01:37:36.343 --> 01:37:41.950
<v Jacob Paulsen>ban and magazine capacity ban will sunset in 2004, a decade later,

01:37:42.322 --> 01:37:43.663
<v Jacob Paulsen>if Congress doesn't renew it.

01:37:44.301 --> 01:37:48.080
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this is sort of a tactic to get it passed. It's like, oh, we don't know if we

01:37:48.185 --> 01:37:49.282
<v Riley Bowman>Can get the votes.

01:37:49.863 --> 01:37:54.512
<v Jacob Paulsen>To make this happen. But if we agree to put this 10-year sunset clause in here,

01:37:55.543 --> 01:37:57.873
<v Jacob Paulsen>then maybe we can gain the votes we need to get this passed.

01:37:58.297 --> 01:37:59.400
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that's how it goes down.

01:38:00.045 --> 01:38:06.929
<v Jacob Paulsen>And good news for us, it sunsets and Congress will not renew it, and it goes.

01:38:09.948 --> 01:38:15.100
<v Jacob Paulsen>I remember, I mean, this is an interesting time because 1994 to 2004 is really

01:38:15.100 --> 01:38:16.386
<v Jacob Paulsen>me going into adulthood.

01:38:16.954 --> 01:38:20.484
<v Jacob Paulsen>And first and foremost, in this period of time, we have the Columbine shooting.

01:38:22.310 --> 01:38:25.550
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's not the first school shooting, not by a long shot. But it is what I call

01:38:25.910 --> 01:38:30.515
<v Jacob Paulsen>the first major national media attention school shooting takes place.

01:38:30.660 --> 01:38:34.288
<v Jacob Paulsen>A lot of kids get slaughtered, and none of those shots fired out of a magazine

01:38:34.544 --> 01:38:35.786
<v Jacob Paulsen>that holds more than 10 rounds.

01:38:36.986 --> 01:38:40.680
<v Jacob Paulsen>Those boys just reloaded a lot. But the other thing that I just,

01:38:40.680 --> 01:38:46.200
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, a personal anecdote, I remember buying my first gun and it was during this period.

01:38:46.200 --> 01:38:52.110
<v Jacob Paulsen>I bought my first gun like from a dealer as a real adult person in,

01:38:52.770 --> 01:38:57.478
<v Jacob Paulsen>well, let's think, it would have been December 2003?

01:38:58.436 --> 01:39:02.290
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, December 2004, something like that. Anyway, I was right in there as this

01:39:02.290 --> 01:39:05.698
<v Jacob Paulsen>was getting ready to sunset is when I, oh, okay. No, it would have been 2001.

01:39:05.994 --> 01:39:08.449
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's when I went in to buy some magazines for my 22.

01:39:09.190 --> 01:39:13.960
<v Jacob Paulsen>My Ruger 1022 and I wanted the banana magazines and the guy behind the counter

01:39:13.960 --> 01:39:16.994
<v Jacob Paulsen>told me that those were illegal and I remember just being pissed

01:39:18.057 --> 01:39:22.930
<v Riley Bowman>You and I grew up in that era we were teenagers essentially during a lot of

01:39:22.930 --> 01:39:29.069
<v Riley Bowman>this Brady Act time frame and Federal Assault Weapons Ban and,

01:39:30.085 --> 01:39:34.939
<v Riley Bowman>we grew up in that era of hearing people talk about pre-ban versus post-ban

01:39:34.939 --> 01:39:38.459
<v Riley Bowman>right yeah well that's a pre-ban magazine you know and so like

01:39:38.842 --> 01:39:42.309
<v Riley Bowman>you know you'd go into the gun shop and all you could find were the 10 round

01:39:42.309 --> 01:39:46.689
<v Riley Bowman>versions right but if you knew somebody that had a pre-ban version.

01:39:47.029 --> 01:39:47.429
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you want to

01:39:47.429 --> 01:39:51.249
<v Riley Bowman>Pay for it then you could you could purchase those right and so guys i mean

01:39:51.249 --> 01:39:56.205
<v Riley Bowman>it was a huge i remember you know folks neighbors family members talking about like

01:39:56.507 --> 01:39:58.979
<v Riley Bowman>pre-ban pre-ban AR magazines that

01:39:58.979 --> 01:40:03.217
<v Riley Bowman>were, you know, 30 round, they were just standard USGI, 30 round aluminum

01:40:03.653 --> 01:40:05.243
<v Riley Bowman>bodied magazines.

01:40:05.499 --> 01:40:07.890
<v Riley Bowman>And that was a big deal to have the pre-ban mags. Right.

01:40:08.378 --> 01:40:12.299
<v Riley Bowman>And then a lot of the things you'd, you know, you'd see AR-15s and magazines

01:40:12.299 --> 01:40:16.000
<v Riley Bowman>that were engraved with, you know, for government use only because they were

01:40:16.296 --> 01:40:19.999
<v Riley Bowman>manufactured for military or police contracts.

01:40:19.999 --> 01:40:20.749
<v Jacob Paulsen>1994.

01:40:20.749 --> 01:40:26.399
<v Riley Bowman>Right. And yeah, that's, that's the era we grew up in, man. And thank goodness

01:40:26.399 --> 01:40:32.899
<v Riley Bowman>for that sunset clause because we would have had to still be fighting that one off probably too.

01:40:32.899 --> 01:40:36.469
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, Congress didn't renew it because this is one of those rare times in history

01:40:36.469 --> 01:40:39.062
<v Jacob Paulsen>where Congress solicited

01:40:39.969 --> 01:40:44.709
<v Jacob Paulsen>and retained on contract a group to perform research to determine whether or

01:40:44.709 --> 01:40:48.344
<v Jacob Paulsen>not the Brady Bill had reduced gun violence.

01:40:48.965 --> 01:40:51.328
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the research came back, no, not a lick.

01:40:51.969 --> 01:40:57.139
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it was like, okay, we're not going to renew this if the research we solicited

01:40:57.139 --> 01:41:00.447
<v Jacob Paulsen>from a neutral third party says it did nothing to help.

01:41:03.244 --> 01:41:08.872
<v Riley Bowman>All right. Now we get to the 2000s. I mean, it sunsetted in 2004,

01:41:08.872 --> 01:41:12.772
<v Riley Bowman>but in 2008, a landmark case comes before the Supreme Court.

01:41:13.092 --> 01:41:14.163
<v Jacob Paulsen>The first big kahuna.

01:41:14.710 --> 01:41:20.032
<v Riley Bowman>Now understand, this is the first big kahuna case since the Miller case.

01:41:20.032 --> 01:41:23.232
<v Riley Bowman>And as we just talked about, the Miller case wasn't even that big of a kahuna

01:41:23.232 --> 01:41:26.572
<v Riley Bowman>because there was nobody even fought for it.

01:41:27.579 --> 01:41:34.393
<v Riley Bowman>And so uh the district of columbia versus heller case this is of course dick heller,

01:41:35.212 --> 01:41:38.613
<v Riley Bowman>he's like hey um i live in dc uh,

01:41:39.426 --> 01:41:42.525
<v Riley Bowman>dc's got a handgun ban i think i should be able to own a handgun,

01:41:43.327 --> 01:41:47.884
<v Riley Bowman>and i think it's trigger locked assembly requirements a bunch of bull bull crap,

01:41:48.394 --> 01:41:53.334
<v Riley Bowman>um so yeah he decides to challenge this and thank goodness for dick heller,

01:41:53.938 --> 01:41:58.467
<v Riley Bowman>uh because just getting started yeah oh yeah uh he is just getting started,

01:41:59.145 --> 01:42:03.832
<v Riley Bowman>so he he sues and of course this goes all up to the supreme court and in a 5-4

01:42:03.832 --> 01:42:08.062
<v Riley Bowman>decision with antonin antonin scalia writing the majority opinion,

01:42:08.868 --> 01:42:13.530
<v Riley Bowman>on that strikes down dc's handgun ban uh and,

01:42:14.488 --> 01:42:21.446
<v Riley Bowman>But in so doing, affirms the right of individuals to keep and bear arms.

01:42:21.446 --> 01:42:25.056
<v Riley Bowman>And that means arms, especially in this case, includes handguns.

01:42:25.056 --> 01:42:28.600
<v Riley Bowman>And so therefore, DC ban, boom, struck down.

01:42:29.482 --> 01:42:32.993
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, because DC's major argument was you're not part of the militia.

01:42:33.144 --> 01:42:35.576
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. That was the key point.

01:42:35.596 --> 01:42:36.376
<v Riley Bowman>Going back to Miller.

01:42:36.376 --> 01:42:39.706
<v Jacob Paulsen>This case was, hey, is this right, the Second Amendment thing,

01:42:39.706 --> 01:42:43.668
<v Jacob Paulsen>does it apply only to militias or does it apply to individuals?

01:42:44.040 --> 01:42:48.324
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it's crazy to look back and think this was a 5-4 decision.

01:42:48.602 --> 01:42:53.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>This was close. This was one Supreme Court justice made the switch, made the flip here.

01:42:54.448 --> 01:43:02.386
<v Jacob Paulsen>So huge, huge, huge, huge victory and established the first kind of real foundation

01:43:02.386 --> 01:43:07.236
<v Jacob Paulsen>for stop with this militia nonsense, the individual right.

01:43:08.159 --> 01:43:11.811
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's the key component here. and look at all of this history

01:43:12.716 --> 01:43:19.176
<v Jacob Paulsen>from 1300s up till today that constantly reestablishes that this is not about

01:43:19.176 --> 01:43:23.546
<v Jacob Paulsen>a military, this is not about a militia, this is about individual rights over

01:43:23.546 --> 01:43:26.822
<v Jacob Paulsen>and over and over and over again. And here it is all laid out for us.

01:43:27.171 --> 01:43:29.968
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you're going to tell me that that's not what this means? Forget it.

01:43:31.304 --> 01:43:32.906
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. Yep. Yep. Yep.

01:43:33.392 --> 01:43:38.319
<v Riley Bowman>And this is kind of the, this is the, this lays the groundwork for everything else that follows,

01:43:38.859 --> 01:43:47.430
<v Riley Bowman>including the, the way they went about this ruling in Scalia's written opinion,

01:43:47.761 --> 01:43:50.999
<v Riley Bowman>going back and looking at some of that historical context.

01:43:50.999 --> 01:43:54.499
<v Riley Bowman>That was a big part of it, referencing many of these things that we've talked

01:43:54.499 --> 01:43:56.759
<v Riley Bowman>about here today. We've pointed out some of those things.

01:43:58.019 --> 01:44:03.749
<v Riley Bowman>That became a framework that we've built upon over the last almost two decades

01:44:03.749 --> 01:44:05.797
<v Riley Bowman>now. This was 18 years ago. Keep that in mind.

01:44:06.174 --> 01:44:10.499
<v Riley Bowman>To get to where we are now as Bruin and other supporting cases.

01:44:10.499 --> 01:44:15.288
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is why this is one that you heard Hillary during the 2016 or whatever election

01:44:15.578 --> 01:44:18.492
<v Jacob Paulsen>cycle. This is why she said Heller got it wrong.

01:44:20.759 --> 01:44:24.689
<v Jacob Paulsen>These gun grabbers will point back to this Heller 1 because there's a second

01:44:24.689 --> 01:44:27.779
<v Jacob Paulsen>Heller decision coming they'll point back to Heller 1 and say that's where the

01:44:27.779 --> 01:44:32.499
<v Jacob Paulsen>Supreme Court screwed up there was a tight decision and it ruled in favor of

01:44:32.499 --> 01:44:35.659
<v Jacob Paulsen>creating this foundational element of gun rights that is

01:44:36.661 --> 01:44:38.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>well it's a snowball rolling down a hill now

01:44:39.499 --> 01:44:44.039
<v Riley Bowman>Again because her opinion in that was no second amendment is about militias

01:44:44.039 --> 01:44:46.418
<v Riley Bowman>and collective rights not individual rights,

01:44:47.730 --> 01:44:51.178
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, Heller didn't get it wrong. And McDonald agreed.

01:44:51.387 --> 01:44:56.600
<v Riley Bowman>All right. So two years after Heller, okay, 2010, the McDonald versus City of Chicago case.

01:44:57.860 --> 01:45:04.605
<v Riley Bowman>This was key because we mentioned a while back about how the Crookshank case,

01:45:04.965 --> 01:45:06.968
<v Riley Bowman>basically one of the logic, you know,

01:45:07.647 --> 01:45:10.794
<v Riley Bowman>some of the logic that was used there was that, hey, we're dealing,

01:45:10.794 --> 01:45:14.741
<v Riley Bowman>we're talking about state or local matters. So it doesn't really apply.

01:45:15.042 --> 01:45:19.524
<v Riley Bowman>If it was a federal thing or a congressional thing, then that's a different

01:45:19.524 --> 01:45:20.673
<v Riley Bowman>animal and the Second Amendment would apply.

01:45:21.062 --> 01:45:26.634
<v Riley Bowman>McDonald pointed out, because this was a challenge against Chicago's handgun ban,

01:45:28.300 --> 01:45:32.386
<v Riley Bowman>where McDonald got that ruling to basically point out that no,

01:45:32.775 --> 01:45:36.351
<v Riley Bowman>the Second Amendment applies to individual rights and...

01:45:40.504 --> 01:45:47.734
<v Riley Bowman>It applies as far as federal, state, and local governments may not restrict

01:45:47.734 --> 01:45:49.104
<v Riley Bowman>these rights, the Second Amendment.

01:45:49.104 --> 01:45:53.232
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, it is preemptive and it is sovereign. And that was key.

01:45:53.904 --> 01:45:59.144
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I'm no judicial expert, but I would imagine that you could see how the D.C.

01:45:59.604 --> 01:46:03.554
<v Jacob Paulsen>Ruling in Heller 1, maybe Chicago is like, well, that's D.C.

01:46:03.554 --> 01:46:08.354
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's a federal district, right? No, we're under the jurisdiction of a state

01:46:08.354 --> 01:46:09.904
<v Jacob Paulsen>and remember that Crookshank thing.

01:46:10.984 --> 01:46:13.979
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that applies here too, right? We can do our own thing, leave us alone.

01:46:14.386 --> 01:46:19.825
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the U.S. Supreme Court said, no. You can't do that.

01:46:19.935 --> 01:46:22.794
<v Riley Bowman>There's some important distinctions here. With the Heller decision,

01:46:22.794 --> 01:46:28.316
<v Riley Bowman>Heller 1, and McDonald decision, these were specifically dealing with handgun bans.

01:46:28.514 --> 01:46:28.897
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes.

01:46:29.083 --> 01:46:32.344
<v Riley Bowman>And these rulings were narrow in that respect as well.

01:46:32.344 --> 01:46:36.432
<v Riley Bowman>So they were basically affirming that, hey, it's an individual right,

01:46:37.755 --> 01:46:45.180
<v Riley Bowman>and handguns are primarily an individual's tool, something that's mostly used for personal defense,

01:46:46.684 --> 01:46:52.514
<v Riley Bowman>and that's relevant because we're not talking about community level or collective

01:46:52.514 --> 01:46:54.424
<v Riley Bowman>or militia level type stuff.

01:46:54.424 --> 01:46:57.724
<v Riley Bowman>We're talking about individual rights, and that means handguns that are personal

01:46:57.724 --> 01:47:03.907
<v Riley Bowman>defense tools, and these rulings dealt with those issues narrowly in that regard.

01:47:04.724 --> 01:47:10.385
<v Riley Bowman>And so that's basically what has forced all jurisdictions nationwide to at least,

01:47:10.582 --> 01:47:12.084
<v Riley Bowman>and they do their best, they do

01:47:12.084 --> 01:47:16.411
<v Riley Bowman>their darndest to restrict as much as they can and to go after things as,

01:47:17.324 --> 01:47:22.829
<v Riley Bowman>narrowly as they can with respect to certain handgun restrictions or bans.

01:47:23.223 --> 01:47:28.854
<v Riley Bowman>But this Heller 1 decision and McDonald decisions basically forced all jurisdictions

01:47:28.854 --> 01:47:34.074
<v Riley Bowman>nationwide to at least recognize that individuals have a right to possess a handgun.

01:47:35.733 --> 01:47:41.254
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, key, critical. These were the big turning points in the modern era of gun rights.

01:47:41.399 --> 01:47:45.572
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Then we have the Heller II decision. This came just a year after McDonald

01:47:45.572 --> 01:47:47.192
<v Riley Bowman>and three years after Heller I.

01:47:47.918 --> 01:47:51.982
<v Riley Bowman>Dick Heller went back again against DC because what happened,

01:47:51.982 --> 01:48:00.162
<v Riley Bowman>of course, after Heller I, DC basically wants to try to tighten things where

01:48:00.162 --> 01:48:01.356
<v Riley Bowman>they can as much as they can.

01:48:02.506 --> 01:48:07.405
<v Riley Bowman>Of course, they also had continued bans on assault weapons and magazines over 10 rounds.

01:48:08.224 --> 01:48:17.032
<v Riley Bowman>Now, the D.C. Circuit Court upheld nearly all of those laws or those local regulations

01:48:17.032 --> 01:48:19.302
<v Riley Bowman>or whatever. I don't know what they call them in D.C.

01:48:20.336 --> 01:48:23.222
<v Riley Bowman>Typically on a city level, we'd call it an ordinance, right?

01:48:23.222 --> 01:48:29.142
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, but the interesting thing here is, and of course,

01:48:29.142 --> 01:48:32.238
<v Riley Bowman>this is where Bruin is going to come back into play about a decade later.

01:48:32.666 --> 01:48:36.567
<v Riley Bowman>The D.C. Circuit Court, of course, used the classic two-step,

01:48:36.696 --> 01:48:42.041
<v Riley Bowman>I say classic now by today's standards, intermediate scrutiny framework that

01:48:42.205 --> 01:48:44.620
<v Riley Bowman>circuit courts nationwide would then adopt.

01:48:44.839 --> 01:48:49.602
<v Riley Bowman>This is where we start seeing more challenges against assault weapon bans,

01:48:49.602 --> 01:48:53.763
<v Riley Bowman>magazine bans, different things that people challenge those laws.

01:48:54.023 --> 01:49:00.009
<v Riley Bowman>And you have these federal courts that are like, well, we're going to apply this,

01:49:00.855 --> 01:49:05.164
<v Riley Bowman>either a strict or an intermediate scrutiny to these standards to,

01:49:05.494 --> 01:49:08.272
<v Riley Bowman>you know, kind of weigh these things on a scale as far as, well,

01:49:08.272 --> 01:49:12.312
<v Riley Bowman>how strong or compelling of a government interest in public safety.

01:49:12.312 --> 01:49:14.872
<v Jacob Paulsen>The importance to public safety exists here,

01:49:14.872 --> 01:49:20.782
<v Riley Bowman>Relevant to the right. And that became kind of this new standard for weighing

01:49:20.782 --> 01:49:22.820
<v Riley Bowman>a lot of these challenges in court.

01:49:24.382 --> 01:49:28.109
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, if there's a demonstrable need of this for public safety,

01:49:28.387 --> 01:49:32.322
<v Jacob Paulsen>then it's an appropriate restriction on someone's Second Amendment rights. Yeah.

01:49:32.622 --> 01:49:36.457
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's kind of the scrutiny that begins to be applied until Bruin.

01:49:38.419 --> 01:49:42.776
<v Riley Bowman>So that's an important thing to understand that, and I had to,

01:49:42.776 --> 01:49:44.986
<v Riley Bowman>I went back and had to do a little bit of,

01:49:45.461 --> 01:49:49.199
<v Riley Bowman>research, Jacob, on this because I was curious, like, where did this sort of

01:49:49.454 --> 01:49:52.556
<v Riley Bowman>strict or intermediate, this kind of two-step approach, like,

01:49:52.556 --> 01:49:57.966
<v Riley Bowman>first it was, we have to first look at a law and weigh in the balance.

01:49:57.966 --> 01:50:01.430
<v Riley Bowman>Is that dealing with an individual right or not, okay?

01:50:01.883 --> 01:50:06.411
<v Riley Bowman>And then two, okay, where's the government's interest in this?

01:50:06.748 --> 01:50:10.817
<v Riley Bowman>And do we apply an intermediate or a strict scrutiny here?

01:50:11.506 --> 01:50:13.754
<v Riley Bowman>Strict scrutiny meaning that we really like,

01:50:16.272 --> 01:50:20.786
<v Riley Bowman>view the government's interest quite strictly versus intermediate where it's

01:50:20.786 --> 01:50:23.766
<v Riley Bowman>like more of this a balanced beam approach where it's like, hey,

01:50:23.766 --> 01:50:27.534
<v Riley Bowman>you know, we've just got to weigh these interests in the balance.

01:50:27.813 --> 01:50:32.116
<v Riley Bowman>And try to balance government's interest and public safety with individual right

01:50:32.116 --> 01:50:34.604
<v Riley Bowman>to possess or have or use or whatever, right?

01:50:35.475 --> 01:50:41.316
<v Riley Bowman>And that basically started, we saw this trend nationwide where these cases would

01:50:41.316 --> 01:50:45.466
<v Riley Bowman>just sort of get stalled out because courts were like, yeah,

01:50:45.582 --> 01:50:49.454
<v Riley Bowman>you know, we think that there's a compelling government interest or public safety,

01:50:51.466 --> 01:50:57.246
<v Riley Bowman>involved. And so, you know, we'd see these assault weapon bans in certain jurisdictions

01:50:57.246 --> 01:50:59.456
<v Riley Bowman>and magazine capacity limitations upheld.

01:51:00.877 --> 01:51:02.827
<v Riley Bowman>And that's kind of what came out of Hell or Two.

01:51:03.001 --> 01:51:04.644
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, not super favorable.

01:51:04.766 --> 01:51:08.676
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. Interesting there. By the way, that was a circuit court rule.

01:51:08.676 --> 01:51:11.337
<v Riley Bowman>That was a D.C. circuit court that ruled this.

01:51:11.535 --> 01:51:15.040
<v Riley Bowman>And Justice Brett Kavanaugh was a part of that. It was a three-judge panel.

01:51:15.289 --> 01:51:18.569
<v Riley Bowman>He was the minority. There were two judges that voted, obviously,

01:51:20.906 --> 01:51:24.415
<v Riley Bowman>with the majority there. Brett Kavanaugh, though, was in the minority.

01:51:24.757 --> 01:51:30.121
<v Riley Bowman>He wrote an interesting dissenting opinion here that if you go and read it,

01:51:30.382 --> 01:51:31.688
<v Riley Bowman>It's basically a preview of Bruin.

01:51:34.406 --> 01:51:38.186
<v Riley Bowman>He made the argument in his dissenting opinion about how we need to look back

01:51:38.186 --> 01:51:40.111
<v Riley Bowman>at the historical context,

01:51:42.206 --> 01:51:46.375
<v Riley Bowman>as part of how we evaluate these challenges, these laws.

01:51:47.153 --> 01:51:50.846
<v Riley Bowman>So kind of cool to see how that's come full circle now that he,

01:51:50.846 --> 01:51:54.306
<v Riley Bowman>of course, just a few years later gets put in the Supreme Court and is playing

01:51:54.306 --> 01:51:56.342
<v Riley Bowman>a huge role in this there.

01:51:57.876 --> 01:52:01.850
<v Riley Bowman>So now we go from, there's a few other cases here and there that popped up,

01:52:01.850 --> 01:52:04.240
<v Riley Bowman>but big cases, and that's what we're here to talk about today,

01:52:04.240 --> 01:52:08.778
<v Riley Bowman>are these big events, the biggest events of the Second Amendment in its history.

01:52:09.741 --> 01:52:14.389
<v Riley Bowman>Now we come to New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin, 2022.

01:52:15.360 --> 01:52:21.360
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, so the issue at root here in this case is that what we used to refer to

01:52:21.360 --> 01:52:25.534
<v Jacob Paulsen>as may issue versus shall issue as it relates to concealed carry permits.

01:52:26.184 --> 01:52:31.970
<v Jacob Paulsen>So what it really comes down to is the idea of, you know, does the Second Amendment

01:52:31.970 --> 01:52:37.006
<v Jacob Paulsen>protect you a right to conceal or carry or have, not even conceal,

01:52:37.670 --> 01:52:42.856
<v Jacob Paulsen>does the Second Amendment protect you a right to have a gun on your person outside of your home,

01:52:43.768 --> 01:52:45.898
<v Jacob Paulsen>in public, one way or another?

01:52:46.223 --> 01:52:48.313
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, is that protected as a right?

01:52:49.044 --> 01:52:54.160
<v Jacob Paulsen>And New York says no, it's not. Like, you know, Heller and McDonald said you

01:52:54.160 --> 01:52:57.130
<v Jacob Paulsen>have an individual right to a gun, you know, for self-defense,

01:52:57.130 --> 01:52:58.966
<v Jacob Paulsen>but, you know, we think that applies to your home.

01:52:59.284 --> 01:53:03.488
<v Jacob Paulsen>In public, we're going to give you no legal means to be armed,

01:53:03.876 --> 01:53:05.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>and we think that's perfectly within the Constitution.

01:53:06.489 --> 01:53:12.200
<v Jacob Paulsen>And, you know, obviously the plaintiff doesn't agree. So that goes to the U.S.

01:53:12.200 --> 01:53:14.057
<v Jacob Paulsen>Supreme Court, and that's where we get brought.

01:53:14.359 --> 01:53:18.306
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Huge, huge landmark case.

01:53:18.805 --> 01:53:23.980
<v Riley Bowman>If we were kind of weighing these things, we don't have to put them on a Well.

01:53:23.980 --> 01:53:26.689
<v Jacob Paulsen>They build on each other so it's hard to really do.

01:53:27.275 --> 01:53:32.150
<v Riley Bowman>But Heller was huge and probably because it was like the first really significant

01:53:32.150 --> 01:53:35.710
<v Riley Bowman>thing like ever, especially in favor of the Second Amendment.

01:53:37.799 --> 01:53:41.851
<v Riley Bowman>Bruin is also just a huge landmark case.

01:53:43.300 --> 01:53:48.364
<v Jacob Paulsen>Spoiler alert, the U.S. Supreme Court says yeah, you do have a right to have a gun on you in public.

01:53:49.524 --> 01:53:58.470
<v Riley Bowman>And the other huge, huge part of Bruin was basically doing away with this silly two-step,

01:53:59.686 --> 01:54:05.448
<v Riley Bowman>intermediate scrutiny test that federal courts were using for years now at this point.

01:54:06.243 --> 01:54:07.601
<v Jacob Paulsen>The hell of two was in 2011.

01:54:07.770 --> 01:54:13.006
<v Riley Bowman>Right. And so that had become the standard. And Bruin did away with that by

01:54:13.006 --> 01:54:18.037
<v Riley Bowman>saying, no, the standard here is we look back at the text, the text of the Second Amendment.

01:54:18.583 --> 01:54:22.026
<v Riley Bowman>And we look at the history, we look at the context with that and where it came

01:54:22.026 --> 01:54:23.906
<v Riley Bowman>from and what the framers intended.

01:54:24.220 --> 01:54:26.913
<v Riley Bowman>And well, how do we know what they intended? Well, we look at,

01:54:27.134 --> 01:54:28.836
<v Riley Bowman>you know, what were the books they were reading?

01:54:28.836 --> 01:54:31.746
<v Riley Bowman>What were the historical frameworks they were operating within?

01:54:31.746 --> 01:54:37.571
<v Riley Bowman>What were the cases they referenced and other cases that were referenced, you know, going back to,

01:54:38.386 --> 01:54:41.083
<v Riley Bowman>you know, we already talked about them here today, the English Bill of Rights

01:54:41.455 --> 01:54:46.743
<v Riley Bowman>and going back to that statute of Northampton all the way back in the 1300s

01:54:47.080 --> 01:54:51.938
<v Riley Bowman>and pointing all these things out, that's what Bruin really honed in on,

01:54:52.972 --> 01:54:59.636
<v Riley Bowman>and clarified on as far as how are the courts supposed to evaluate and look

01:54:59.636 --> 01:55:02.805
<v Riley Bowman>at these laws when they come before us for review.

01:55:03.490 --> 01:55:07.007
<v Riley Bowman>And that's having a huge,

01:55:09.161 --> 01:55:12.632
<v Riley Bowman>impact on things. In fact, there's an interesting statistic here, Jacob.

01:55:14.223 --> 01:55:17.392
<v Riley Bowman>Bruin has triggered an explosion of Second Amendment lawsuits.

01:55:17.636 --> 01:55:17.938
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah.

01:55:18.785 --> 01:55:22.860
<v Riley Bowman>Roughly 680 cases a year.

01:55:23.209 --> 01:55:26.570
<v Riley Bowman>So on average, 680 cases a year.

01:55:26.802 --> 01:55:30.674
<v Riley Bowman>So challenges on Second Amendment issues have been brought before the courts

01:55:30.976 --> 01:55:35.353
<v Riley Bowman>since Bruin versus 74 cases a year before.

01:55:35.759 --> 01:55:38.952
<v Jacob Paulsen>Makes a little sense, right? It's like, oh, by that standard,

01:55:39.172 --> 01:55:43.340
<v Jacob Paulsen>like all this stuff that's happening like all over the place is unconstitutional.

01:55:43.515 --> 01:55:47.090
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. And we think we can win the fight because Bruin said that they,

01:55:47.282 --> 01:55:51.758
<v Jacob Paulsen>in order for them to win, this is what they have to show and they got nothing. So let's go to battle.

01:55:51.920 --> 01:55:55.008
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. That's why this is such a landmark case.

01:55:55.641 --> 01:55:58.868
<v Riley Bowman>And I appreciate what you said. And I completely agree as far as like each of

01:55:58.868 --> 01:56:01.266
<v Riley Bowman>these, the Heller, McDonald, Heller 2,

01:56:03.222 --> 01:56:07.448
<v Riley Bowman>and Bruin have all just, they've just been, and we see that framework just kind

01:56:07.448 --> 01:56:14.001
<v Riley Bowman>of, you know, as I mentioned a moment ago about how Scalia's opinion in Heller 1, you know, where he,

01:56:15.468 --> 01:56:18.645
<v Riley Bowman>that's when he first started really going back and looking at some of that old

01:56:18.802 --> 01:56:25.158
<v Riley Bowman>case law and English law and all those historical contexts that he then applied in that case.

01:56:25.158 --> 01:56:28.287
<v Riley Bowman>And that was just built upon all the way up here now to Bruin.

01:56:29.257 --> 01:56:32.918
<v Riley Bowman>One more case here we're going to talk about in the historical context.

01:56:32.918 --> 01:56:36.153
<v Riley Bowman>This happened two years ago. This is the United States versus Rahimi case.

01:56:36.391 --> 01:56:41.180
<v Riley Bowman>This has been pretty notable.

01:56:41.552 --> 01:56:47.734
<v Riley Bowman>And this is not what we'd call a win necessarily, right?

01:56:48.163 --> 01:56:54.770
<v Riley Bowman>But this was a law that is the first real test of the Bruin standard.

01:56:55.848 --> 01:56:59.288
<v Riley Bowman>And that's why this is notable. And Bruin is not perfect either.

01:56:59.288 --> 01:57:00.737
<v Riley Bowman>We have to recognize that too.

01:57:01.508 --> 01:57:05.688
<v Riley Bowman>In fact, there's people on both sides, both on the more liberal side that say

01:57:05.688 --> 01:57:08.207
<v Riley Bowman>Bruin got it wrong and Bruin's not.

01:57:09.403 --> 01:57:13.669
<v Riley Bowman>Clear enough or it's causing all kinds of problems. I've seen some things from

01:57:13.932 --> 01:57:20.828
<v Riley Bowman>some more liberal justices that are basically criticizing Bruin because of it

01:57:21.078 --> 01:57:23.399
<v Riley Bowman>complicating matters for the federal court system.

01:57:23.712 --> 01:57:29.192
<v Riley Bowman>And people on the other side saying that it didn't quite get it fully right

01:57:29.192 --> 01:57:31.782
<v Riley Bowman>because it's, you know, this is an example of it.

01:57:31.782 --> 01:57:35.632
<v Riley Bowman>So the Rahimi case, basically this was a domestic violence restraining order

01:57:35.632 --> 01:57:41.662
<v Riley Bowman>case, so a red flag type law, that kind of thing. Okay. So a domestic violence restraining order.

01:57:42.549 --> 01:57:47.352
<v Riley Bowman>And we don't have to go into the specifics of the case, but what came out of

01:57:47.352 --> 01:57:52.105
<v Riley Bowman>this was a ruling of eight to one.

01:57:52.842 --> 01:57:57.012
<v Riley Bowman>And ironically, the only dissenting justice was Justice Thomas,

01:57:57.012 --> 01:58:00.743
<v Riley Bowman>who wrote the Bruin majority opinion, right?

01:58:01.739 --> 01:58:07.832
<v Riley Bowman>And basically, the Rahimi case suggests that the lower courts had been applying

01:58:07.832 --> 01:58:11.985
<v Riley Bowman>Bruin's historical test, or, and I'm getting this wrong, backwards.

01:58:14.560 --> 01:58:17.380
<v Riley Bowman>And Justice Thomas is the one that basically said, no, you're getting it wrong.

01:58:17.380 --> 01:58:20.964
<v Riley Bowman>He's a brewing purist. Right. He's absolutely a brewing purist.

01:58:21.780 --> 01:58:25.987
<v Riley Bowman>He wrote to clarify, no, you are trying to apply this too narrowly.

01:58:26.690 --> 01:58:34.531
<v Riley Bowman>Whereas the majority opinion justices on the Rahimi case, he's like, you got this wrong.

01:58:34.833 --> 01:58:40.550
<v Riley Bowman>You went back and basically took parts of two different laws from way back and

01:58:40.550 --> 01:58:45.707
<v Riley Bowman>tried to mix them into one to use as an analog for this Rahimi case.

01:58:46.054 --> 01:58:50.094
<v Riley Bowman>He's like, that's not the intent of Bruin, and that's not the intent of the Second Amendment.

01:58:51.120 --> 01:58:55.669
<v Riley Bowman>And so it's an interesting thing here to see kind of how that swung like that.

01:58:56.219 --> 01:59:00.120
<v Riley Bowman>But why Rahimi is relevant is because it's helping, at least in some regard,

01:59:00.120 --> 01:59:01.853
<v Riley Bowman>provide some clarification.

01:59:02.139 --> 01:59:04.820
<v Riley Bowman>Whether we agree with the majority in that case or not.

01:59:05.600 --> 01:59:11.385
<v Riley Bowman>But even in Justice Thomas's own words, we can gain some more clarification

01:59:11.734 --> 01:59:14.016
<v Riley Bowman>on what Bruin is really all about.

01:59:14.462 --> 01:59:18.840
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think that this is the first place where we've basically seen the Supreme Court say,

01:59:20.543 --> 01:59:27.959
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can remove someone's Second Amendment rights, not just because you can demonstrate

01:59:28.348 --> 01:59:34.293
<v Jacob Paulsen>a historical perfect similarity to the law you have now.

01:59:34.687 --> 01:59:42.013
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you can just get close. We want a historical analog, not a historical exact

01:59:42.304 --> 01:59:45.282
<v Jacob Paulsen>replica of the current restriction. Yeah.

01:59:45.938 --> 01:59:50.673
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that was the, I think, so it, you know, from a gun rights perspective,

01:59:50.673 --> 01:59:55.483
<v Jacob Paulsen>the argument could be made that Rahimi was not positive, that it sort of pulled back.

01:59:55.823 --> 01:59:59.183
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's almost like Bruin, you know, pushed it really far down the road.

01:59:59.183 --> 02:00:03.303
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like, hey, if you can't show that there was some perfect historical example

02:00:03.303 --> 02:00:06.196
<v Jacob Paulsen>of what the restriction you're imposing today, then forget it.

02:00:06.567 --> 02:00:10.317
<v Jacob Paulsen>Then Rahimi kind of pulled back like, well, I mean, maybe not a perfect historical,

02:00:10.659 --> 02:00:13.783
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, example, but, you know, just something that's close.

02:00:13.783 --> 02:00:14.723
<v Riley Bowman>It rained it back a little bit.

02:00:14.803 --> 02:00:15.739
<v Jacob Paulsen>It rained it back a little bit.

02:00:16.115 --> 02:00:20.463
<v Riley Bowman>And I can see that. I may not entirely agree with where the court stood on this,

02:00:20.463 --> 02:00:22.456
<v Riley Bowman>and obviously Justice Thomas didn't at all.

02:00:23.963 --> 02:00:27.963
<v Riley Bowman>But that's kind of what we – that's the whole point here is that we see Bruin,

02:00:27.963 --> 02:00:30.629
<v Riley Bowman>like you said, just pushed it way far down the road, and Rahimi's like,

02:00:31.783 --> 02:00:32.883
<v Riley Bowman>hold on here just a little bit.

02:00:32.903 --> 02:00:36.893
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Some restrictions are okay. We don't need a perfect historical

02:00:36.893 --> 02:00:40.294
<v Jacob Paulsen>example of the exact same restriction.

02:00:40.637 --> 02:00:43.783
<v Jacob Paulsen>We need we need a historical analog you know to

02:00:43.783 --> 02:00:46.433
<v Riley Bowman>Justify this that's fair yeah that's

02:00:46.433 --> 02:00:49.553
<v Riley Bowman>where we are today and that sets the framework for where we are today,

02:00:50.029 --> 02:00:54.043
<v Riley Bowman>uh and we are seeing a whole bunch of cases right now working through the court

02:00:54.043 --> 02:00:59.686
<v Riley Bowman>system i mean we've got things uh testing the courts on purchasing of of handguns,

02:01:00.463 --> 02:01:05.723
<v Riley Bowman>of 18 to 20 to 18 to 21 year olds we got magazine capacity limitations We've

02:01:05.723 --> 02:01:08.934
<v Riley Bowman>got assault weapon type stuff, you know, AR-15s, whatever.

02:01:10.513 --> 02:01:13.381
<v Riley Bowman>A number of things work on their way through the courts or sitting in the courts,

02:01:14.203 --> 02:01:18.663
<v Riley Bowman>or in some cases have been turned down by the Supreme Court. You know, they've...

02:01:19.488 --> 02:01:19.915
<v Riley Bowman>Received,

02:01:22.611 --> 02:01:24.916
<v Riley Bowman>those cases and said, no, we're not going to take that right now.

02:01:25.795 --> 02:01:29.445
<v Riley Bowman>But here's some big news as of just yesterday. Two days ago?

02:01:29.575 --> 02:01:30.315
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, yesterday.

02:01:30.315 --> 02:01:35.615
<v Riley Bowman>I think it was yesterday. Maybe it was two days ago. But just in the last 24,

02:01:35.615 --> 02:01:41.222
<v Riley Bowman>48 hours, the Supreme Court is now going to hear two cases combined into one.

02:01:41.843 --> 02:01:46.000
<v Riley Bowman>They're combining the Viramontes versus Cook County cases out of Illinois,

02:01:46.255 --> 02:01:48.415
<v Riley Bowman>kind of like the McDonald case, and the Grant v.

02:01:48.855 --> 02:01:53.093
<v Riley Bowman>Higgins case. They're both AR-15 related cases.

02:01:53.377 --> 02:01:58.575
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, so the question that they're going to answer is, can a specific type of

02:01:58.575 --> 02:02:03.559
<v Jacob Paulsen>firearm, i.e. the AR-15, be banned or not?

02:02:03.906 --> 02:02:07.005
<v Riley Bowman>Semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines.

02:02:07.005 --> 02:02:15.051
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. This may or may not also address magazine capacity limitation questions.

02:02:15.925 --> 02:02:20.474
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, it's a relevant question. And in some of those cases, I think in the Higgins

02:02:20.671 --> 02:02:22.953
<v Riley Bowman>case, well, one of those cases, I think it touches on that.

02:02:24.439 --> 02:02:28.075
<v Riley Bowman>The feeling I'm getting from reading some other online legal analysis of this

02:02:28.075 --> 02:02:33.302
<v Riley Bowman>is that the court's probably going to just tackle the AR-15 question.

02:02:34.495 --> 02:02:39.865
<v Riley Bowman>And the court generally tries to be as narrow as possible in such things anyway.

02:02:39.865 --> 02:02:42.307
<v Riley Bowman>That's just like a standard practice. Like they try to just,

02:02:42.684 --> 02:02:46.114
<v Riley Bowman>what's the issue before us? We're going to go after that issue and not try to,

02:02:46.330 --> 02:02:48.095
<v Riley Bowman>it's very rare that it's application.

02:02:48.095 --> 02:02:49.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>With its context, right?

02:02:49.195 --> 02:02:52.485
<v Riley Bowman>It's very rare that Supreme court issues rulings that are like super broad,

02:02:52.485 --> 02:02:54.176
<v Riley Bowman>super wide, you know, all encompassing.

02:02:54.983 --> 02:02:57.781
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, not that it doesn't happen. It's just, it's very rare. And so it,

02:02:58.419 --> 02:03:02.505
<v Riley Bowman>it, it, it's possible. It's possible. I don't think it's terribly likely that

02:03:02.505 --> 02:03:07.667
<v Riley Bowman>they're going to also pick up as part of these two cases, anything to do with magazine capacities.

02:03:07.835 --> 02:03:12.345
<v Riley Bowman>But I think a natural assuming, and I do think the court is favorable in this

02:03:12.345 --> 02:03:17.087
<v Riley Bowman>regard, because, I mean, especially you still have Justice Thomas, um,

02:03:18.649 --> 02:03:22.230
<v Riley Bowman>And Alito and Kavanaugh, certainly.

02:03:23.098 --> 02:03:27.130
<v Riley Bowman>Those are certainly the three that are pretty pure on the Second Amendment issues.

02:03:27.501 --> 02:03:29.620
<v Riley Bowman>Some of the others are also pretty strong.

02:03:30.638 --> 02:03:36.648
<v Riley Bowman>But I think the court is leaning very favorably on the issue of probably coming

02:03:36.648 --> 02:03:41.308
<v Riley Bowman>down on the right side as we see it with regards to AR-15s or semi-automatic rifles.

02:03:41.308 --> 02:03:42.577
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, looks positive.

02:03:42.989 --> 02:03:45.918
<v Riley Bowman>That will create a natural consequence of, well, okay,

02:03:46.678 --> 02:03:54.958
<v Riley Bowman>if this gun, this tool is a protected arm and we have a right to possess,

02:03:54.958 --> 02:03:58.121
<v Riley Bowman>therefore can't be restricted or banned,

02:03:59.318 --> 02:04:03.468
<v Riley Bowman>then the tools in common use, for instance, then the tools that also support

02:04:03.468 --> 02:04:08.028
<v Riley Bowman>using that arm, such as standard capacity magazines, 30 round magazines,

02:04:08.028 --> 02:04:11.018
<v Riley Bowman>for instance, should also be a part of that.

02:04:11.018 --> 02:04:17.428
<v Riley Bowman>Well, if that's not ruled on in these Veramontes or Grant v.

02:04:17.428 --> 02:04:23.798
<v Riley Bowman>Higgins cases, it's going to probably be kind of a second order.

02:04:23.798 --> 02:04:24.718
<v Jacob Paulsen>A near future thing.

02:04:24.718 --> 02:04:28.812
<v Riley Bowman>It's going to have to come up as well. So I don't know what the intent of the court here is.

02:04:29.532 --> 02:04:31.558
<v Riley Bowman>Maybe they have no intent on the magazine's thing. I don't know.

02:04:31.558 --> 02:04:34.238
<v Riley Bowman>I don't know where they stand on that. But I'm glad to see that they're going

02:04:34.238 --> 02:04:36.736
<v Riley Bowman>to take up a semi-automatic rifle case.

02:04:37.050 --> 02:04:41.648
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is significant because we're seeing in a very short period of time a lot

02:04:41.648 --> 02:04:43.104
<v Jacob Paulsen>of Second Amendment-related cases.

02:04:43.743 --> 02:04:45.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>We've already had the –

02:04:47.998 --> 02:04:51.996
<v Jacob Paulsen>man, I'm struggling. We've had two U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the last

02:04:51.996 --> 02:04:56.388
<v Jacob Paulsen>60 days related to the Second Amendment. We had a Hawaii ruling.

02:04:56.388 --> 02:05:01.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>We had the – man, struggling with the other one, the marijuana one that just

02:05:01.198 --> 02:05:02.892
<v Jacob Paulsen>came out. That's the – It's with an H. Yeah.

02:05:04.013 --> 02:05:04.268
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

02:05:04.407 --> 02:05:04.840
<v Jacob Paulsen>Hamani?

02:05:04.840 --> 02:05:07.199
<v Riley Bowman>We just talked about it. Something like that. Yeah.

02:05:07.391 --> 02:05:11.431
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that ruling just came out as well. And now we're taking up the AR-15 question.

02:05:11.693 --> 02:05:16.871
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is unprecedented if you look at kind of a historical view of the U.S. Supreme Court.

02:05:17.062 --> 02:05:20.203
<v Jacob Paulsen>Of course, it's also unprecedented the number of lawsuits that are being filed,

02:05:20.545 --> 02:05:22.920
<v Jacob Paulsen>right, and the number of issues that are being brought up. Wait,

02:05:23.240 --> 02:05:25.056
<v Jacob Paulsen>based on the Bruin, is this constitutional?

02:05:25.265 --> 02:05:27.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>Is this constitutional? Is this constitutional?

02:05:27.505 --> 02:05:29.804
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is bubbling up and the U.S. Supreme Court is getting busy.

02:05:30.181 --> 02:05:34.710
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this is the time you thank your lucky stars that the right people were appointed

02:05:34.710 --> 02:05:37.171
<v Jacob Paulsen>to the U.S. Supreme Court in recent history.

02:05:37.629 --> 02:05:45.000
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, for sure. Yeah, I think this last session is the first time ever that

02:05:45.000 --> 02:05:49.418
<v Riley Bowman>Supreme Court issued opinions on more than one Second Amendment case.

02:05:49.807 --> 02:05:51.150
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and now we're picking up another one.

02:05:51.150 --> 02:05:55.066
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. So big, big, big deal. So I'd say the future looks bright,

02:05:55.589 --> 02:06:00.600
<v Riley Bowman>and especially in light of the last 20 years of court rulings,

02:06:00.600 --> 02:06:04.522
<v Riley Bowman>especially where we see this boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, all the way up to Bruin,

02:06:05.538 --> 02:06:10.340
<v Riley Bowman>that this is, I think our future is bright for the Second Amendment.

02:06:10.340 --> 02:06:17.360
<v Riley Bowman>And I'm very, I'm proud of the fact that, I mean, all the imperfections aside

02:06:17.360 --> 02:06:22.646
<v Riley Bowman>of our nation, certainly there's perfections of many, imperfections of many.

02:06:23.560 --> 02:06:27.946
<v Riley Bowman>They're in problems and challenges and all kinds of things, issues,

02:06:29.072 --> 02:06:31.783
<v Riley Bowman>but we still live in I think the greatest country on earth.

02:06:32.857 --> 02:06:36.938
<v Riley Bowman>And I'm proud to live here. I'm proud that we even have the rights that we do have.

02:06:37.187 --> 02:06:40.873
<v Riley Bowman>Proud that I have, like, I'm carrying my gun right here. You carrying your gun?

02:06:41.233 --> 02:06:41.628
<v Jacob Paulsen>Naturally.

02:06:41.941 --> 02:06:42.267
<v Riley Bowman>You know?

02:06:44.741 --> 02:06:49.562
<v Riley Bowman>Where else in the world could we be living the way we live our lives,

02:06:49.899 --> 02:06:54.281
<v Riley Bowman>carrying our guns, shooting, going to the range, going to shoot?

02:06:54.881 --> 02:06:57.011
<v Riley Bowman>Yes, there's some countries where you can do some of those things,

02:06:57.011 --> 02:07:01.461
<v Riley Bowman>but you can't do all the things like we're able to do here in the U.S. of A.

02:07:01.607 --> 02:07:02.257
<v Jacob Paulsen>Not even close.

02:07:03.075 --> 02:07:09.041
<v Riley Bowman>And so it's pretty remarkable. The intent here today was to break down for you

02:07:09.041 --> 02:07:10.147
<v Riley Bowman>guys, and I know it was a lot.

02:07:10.350 --> 02:07:13.334
<v Riley Bowman>It's been a two-hour episode. I knew it was going to be a mega episode.

02:07:13.479 --> 02:07:14.732
<v Riley Bowman>But I thought it was an important one to do.

02:07:15.168 --> 02:07:22.951
<v Riley Bowman>And I think a perfect time to, in this 250th birthday period of our nation,

02:07:23.462 --> 02:07:25.881
<v Riley Bowman>to look back and establish,

02:07:28.125 --> 02:07:32.261
<v Riley Bowman>the context and the history, the story behind our nation and how we got to where

02:07:32.261 --> 02:07:36.981
<v Riley Bowman>we are today with respect to the Second Amendment and to honor that a little

02:07:36.981 --> 02:07:41.331
<v Riley Bowman>bit. And I hope we've accomplished that at least somewhat here in our episode today.

02:07:41.847 --> 02:07:46.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's also a reminder that you have to continue to exercise and protect your

02:07:46.891 --> 02:07:48.469
<v Jacob Paulsen>rights if you want to maintain them.

02:07:50.280 --> 02:07:53.861
<v Jacob Paulsen>Absolutely. So keep doing your part to support the organization.

02:07:53.861 --> 02:07:58.001
<v Jacob Paulsen>700 lawsuits, someone's got to pay all those attorneys.

02:07:58.564 --> 02:08:02.881
<v Jacob Paulsen>Where's that coming from? That's coming from people like us who are supporting

02:08:02.881 --> 02:08:04.932
<v Jacob Paulsen>all those organizations. So keep doing your part.

02:08:06.610 --> 02:08:12.483
<v Riley Bowman>We talked about in the episode about what happens when people don't appreciate

02:08:12.483 --> 02:08:14.034
<v Riley Bowman>or exercise those rights.

02:08:14.973 --> 02:08:17.153
<v Riley Bowman>We talked about what happened with the National Firearms Act.

02:08:17.153 --> 02:08:18.393
<v Riley Bowman>They laid down. And we're paying for it today.

02:08:18.793 --> 02:08:21.813
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, we just didn't think it was a big deal. People didn't care.

02:08:22.051 --> 02:08:26.123
<v Riley Bowman>They slept on it a little bit. They just kind of, meh, doesn't affect me,

02:08:26.123 --> 02:08:27.153
<v Riley Bowman>so I'm not going to worry about it.

02:08:28.094 --> 02:08:32.343
<v Riley Bowman>And what we know from history, on the legislative side especially,

02:08:32.343 --> 02:08:38.063
<v Riley Bowman>is that the anti-gunners will try to take, even if it's just an inch at a time,

02:08:38.063 --> 02:08:41.149
<v Riley Bowman>they will take a little more, they'll take a little more, they'll take a little bit more.

02:08:41.386 --> 02:08:46.854
<v Riley Bowman>We have a lot to be thankful for and a lot of wins on the judicial side of the equation.

02:08:47.516 --> 02:08:51.673
<v Riley Bowman>But the fight's not over and it's going to continue. And when the courts rule

02:08:51.673 --> 02:08:55.719
<v Riley Bowman>a certain way, the anti-gunners go another way and they try another tactic.

02:08:57.007 --> 02:09:00.763
<v Riley Bowman>So the future is bright and there's a lot of great things happening for us,

02:09:02.680 --> 02:09:06.180
<v Riley Bowman>The fight's not over, and we can't sit on our hands and do nothing.

02:09:06.534 --> 02:09:10.122
<v Riley Bowman>We need to respect our Second Amendment and fight for it.

02:09:11.120 --> 02:09:12.345
<v Jacob Paulsen>Game on. Let's go to battle.

02:09:13.314 --> 02:09:20.251
<v Riley Bowman>Happy birthday, America. Happy 250 years. Our nation is not perfect. It never was.

02:09:20.948 --> 02:09:24.690
<v Riley Bowman>I think we could say it was intended to be perfect, but the founders knew what

02:09:24.690 --> 02:09:28.050
<v Riley Bowman>they were creating was not perfect, nor would it be perfect.

02:09:28.050 --> 02:09:31.484
<v Riley Bowman>In fact, some of them thought that it would only last a few decades at most.

02:09:32.007 --> 02:09:33.780
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was referred to as the American experiment.

02:09:33.780 --> 02:09:39.553
<v Riley Bowman>It was an experiment. And here it is still experimenting. I'm thankful for it. I hope you are too.

02:09:40.028 --> 02:09:44.817
<v Riley Bowman>We wish you all a happy 250th birthday, America.

02:09:45.264 --> 02:09:49.902
<v Riley Bowman>May you spend it doing those things that you enjoy most, enjoying your freedoms

02:09:50.209 --> 02:09:52.317
<v Riley Bowman>with people that you care the most about.

02:09:54.053 --> 02:09:58.880
<v Riley Bowman>Have a great weekend. Be safe. Don't blow off your hands with fireworks or anything.

02:09:58.880 --> 02:10:01.580
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, don't light a forest fire, you know.

02:10:01.580 --> 02:10:04.908
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, or shoot yourself with your gun, you know, because you're having too much fun.

02:10:05.820 --> 02:10:08.620
<v Riley Bowman>Don't drink and shoot. Don't drink and drive, all that stuff,

02:10:08.620 --> 02:10:13.980
<v Riley Bowman>okay? We just hope that you have a wonderful, safe, enjoyable holiday weekend

02:10:13.980 --> 02:10:16.199
<v Riley Bowman>here as it's coming up here in just a few days.

02:10:16.344 --> 02:10:19.460
<v Riley Bowman>Don't forget about our Happy Birthday America sale. Go to concealedcarry.com

02:10:19.460 --> 02:10:21.487
<v Riley Bowman>forward slash HBA for details.

02:10:21.870 --> 02:10:25.051
<v Riley Bowman>Pick yourself up one of those. It's the only way you can get one, okay?

02:10:25.365 --> 02:10:29.811
<v Riley Bowman>To get one of those commemorative 250th birthday America coins,

02:10:30.427 --> 02:10:34.136
<v Riley Bowman>you got to go and participate in our happy birthday America sale.

02:10:35.080 --> 02:10:36.893
<v Riley Bowman>All orders will get one of those coins.

02:10:38.460 --> 02:10:42.320
<v Riley Bowman>And join Guardian Nation, guardianation.com if you want to learn more so you

02:10:42.320 --> 02:10:43.533
<v Riley Bowman>can take advantage of the biggest deals.

02:10:44.716 --> 02:10:46.487
<v Jacob Paulsen>Well, there it is.

02:10:46.929 --> 02:10:50.736
<v Riley Bowman>Until next time. A reminder to train right, train often, and train safe.

02:10:51.421 --> 02:10:54.595
<v Jacob Paulsen>So you can fight hard, fight fast, and fight true. Take care.

02:11:08.630 --> 02:11:10.740
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder that laws vary from place to place, and we encourage listeners to

02:11:10.740 --> 02:11:12.706
<v Riley Bowman>seek local legal advice to understand applicable laws.

02:11:12.941 --> 02:11:15.270
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, Inc., its brands and properties, and the Concealed Carry podcast

02:11:15.270 --> 02:11:16.930
<v Riley Bowman>is not a legal service, nor are we attorneys at law.

02:11:17.190 --> 02:11:19.370
<v Riley Bowman>We make our best faith effort to share Concealed Carry-related insights and

02:11:19.370 --> 02:11:21.670
<v Riley Bowman>information about firearm-related incidents and the laws pertaining,

02:11:21.670 --> 02:11:23.100
<v Riley Bowman>based on our own understanding and experience.

02:11:23.396 --> 02:11:25.510
<v Riley Bowman>But things can be different where you live, or laws may have changed by the

02:11:25.510 --> 02:11:28.000
<v Riley Bowman>time you listen to this. We cannot be held liable for your actions based on

02:11:28.000 --> 02:11:29.190
<v Riley Bowman>the information shared in this podcast.

02:11:29.457 --> 02:11:31.470
<v Riley Bowman>Please exercise care with all things pertaining to firearm use,

02:11:31.470 --> 02:11:34.082
<v Riley Bowman>concealed carry, and always practice following basic firearm safety rules.

02:11:34.390 --> 02:11:37.420
<v Riley Bowman>More information about safety can be found at concealedcarry.com forward slash safety.

