WEBVTT

00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:04.477
<v Riley Bowman>This is the Concealed Carry Podcast, Season 13, Episode 15.

00:00:15.217 --> 00:00:19.157
<v Riley Bowman>And welcome to the Concealed Carry Podcast, brought to you by HK.

00:00:19.877 --> 00:00:24.077
<v Riley Bowman>Today is Wednesday, April 15th. It's tax day, holy cow. Now,

00:00:24.657 --> 00:00:28.537
<v Riley Bowman>April 15th, 2026, hopefully folks are at least, at the very least,

00:00:28.657 --> 00:00:31.077
<v Riley Bowman>getting your extension put in if you haven't done anything.

00:00:32.097 --> 00:00:37.837
<v Riley Bowman>So anyway, happy tax day to everybody. I'm sure it's your favorite day of the year.

00:00:38.257 --> 00:00:43.277
<v Riley Bowman>And if you're a tax accountant, it is definitely not your favorite day of the year.

00:00:43.837 --> 00:00:44.317
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sucks.

00:00:44.557 --> 00:00:46.077
<v Riley Bowman>Tomorrow is a little bit better.

00:00:46.337 --> 00:00:47.957
<v Jacob Paulsen>A little bit. Maybe a little bit. Yeah.

00:00:49.537 --> 00:00:53.297
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, we're here with you for another episode of the Constell Carry Podcast.

00:00:53.297 --> 00:00:56.377
<v Riley Bowman>Thanks for joining us. We've got, I think, an interesting topic today.

00:00:57.545 --> 00:01:02.645
<v Riley Bowman>Uh we're going to talk about uh a major mind mindset shift there's a tongue

00:01:02.645 --> 00:01:05.405
<v Riley Bowman>twister potentially for you a mindset shift mindset.

00:01:05.405 --> 00:01:08.205
<v Jacob Paulsen>Shift mindset shift mindset shift mindset shift mindset shift

00:01:08.205 --> 00:01:09.405
<v Riley Bowman>You're pretty good at that oh.

00:01:09.405 --> 00:01:10.305
<v Jacob Paulsen>I did better than i thought i would

00:01:10.305 --> 00:01:14.945
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah you did you did very well i could see that very quickly turning into something

00:01:14.945 --> 00:01:20.465
<v Riley Bowman>other than minds shit you see where i'm going right so anyway it's a family

00:01:20.465 --> 00:01:23.845
<v Riley Bowman>friendly program let's move on Welcome to the podcast.

00:01:24.125 --> 00:01:27.585
<v Riley Bowman>Today's episode sponsored by HK, in fact.

00:01:27.945 --> 00:01:32.185
<v Riley Bowman>We appreciate their support, long time now, support of the Concealed Carry podcast

00:01:32.185 --> 00:01:33.105
<v Riley Bowman>for making this possible.

00:01:33.425 --> 00:01:36.665
<v Riley Bowman>You guys are hopefully well familiar. If you've listened to past episodes in

00:01:36.665 --> 00:01:40.025
<v Riley Bowman>recent memory, even you've seen, you know, we had, I don't know,

00:01:40.105 --> 00:01:44.405
<v Riley Bowman>five or six or whatever episodes we recorded right at the HK booth at Shaw Show

00:01:44.405 --> 00:01:45.485
<v Riley Bowman>just a couple months ago.

00:01:46.185 --> 00:01:49.765
<v Riley Bowman>And they continue to support everything we do here in our mission at concealedcarry.com.

00:01:49.765 --> 00:01:52.385
<v Riley Bowman>So we're happy to support them and hope that you will do the same.

00:01:52.865 --> 00:01:57.485
<v Riley Bowman>You can head on over to hk-usa.com to see their full lineup of products,

00:01:57.685 --> 00:02:02.105
<v Riley Bowman>all their pistols and rifles and other accessories and cool products.

00:02:02.105 --> 00:02:04.905
<v Riley Bowman>Even just if you want to pick up a cool t-shirt.

00:02:05.025 --> 00:02:10.925
<v Riley Bowman>They always have some fun t-shirt designs, hats, holsters for HK pistols are

00:02:10.925 --> 00:02:12.605
<v Riley Bowman>also available on their website.

00:02:13.605 --> 00:02:17.185
<v Riley Bowman>We make them too, obviously, at KSG Armory, but they do have some,

00:02:17.185 --> 00:02:19.485
<v Riley Bowman>I think, for some models we don't quite support.

00:02:19.765 --> 00:02:22.305
<v Riley Bowman>Even though we try to support as many HKs as we can.

00:02:23.645 --> 00:02:28.525
<v Riley Bowman>What else? Yeah, just awesome guns. So recently, you know, got our hands on

00:02:28.525 --> 00:02:33.305
<v Riley Bowman>the VP9CC, which is their newest microcompact.

00:02:33.425 --> 00:02:38.025
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was going to point out in an anonymous fashion, we got an email, you and I, this week.

00:02:38.185 --> 00:02:38.345
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:02:38.485 --> 00:02:43.085
<v Jacob Paulsen>From a gentleman who works for a firearm manufacturer that is not HK.

00:02:43.425 --> 00:02:43.625
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah.

00:02:43.945 --> 00:02:49.325
<v Jacob Paulsen>Asking for our opinion on which HK he should buy, the CC9 or the new VP9CC. Yeah.

00:02:50.271 --> 00:02:51.811
<v Riley Bowman>I thought it was an interesting email as well.

00:02:52.031 --> 00:02:55.831
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was like, hmm, okay. Well, when you work for a different company that makes

00:02:55.831 --> 00:03:00.471
<v Jacob Paulsen>guns that people have heard of, and you're looking to carry an HK as your daily

00:03:00.471 --> 00:03:02.711
<v Jacob Paulsen>carry, that tells you something about HK.

00:03:03.891 --> 00:03:05.591
<v Riley Bowman>That's a good point. That's a good point.

00:03:06.737 --> 00:03:11.137
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, they're all fine firearms. Jacob's carrying a CC9 right now.

00:03:11.377 --> 00:03:16.357
<v Riley Bowman>I'm carrying a VP9A1 series, the F.

00:03:17.777 --> 00:03:24.197
<v Riley Bowman>So it's a pretty awesome gun. Kevin on YouTube says this HK's look nice.

00:03:24.457 --> 00:03:27.297
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, they do look nice. I think they look fine. Yeah. I mean,

00:03:27.377 --> 00:03:30.937
<v Riley Bowman>I'm not super, like, into the aesthetics of a firearm.

00:03:31.077 --> 00:03:34.677
<v Riley Bowman>I care more about how it works, but I think they look fine.

00:03:34.857 --> 00:03:38.097
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, they're good. good uh so anyway hk

00:03:38.097 --> 00:03:41.157
<v Riley Bowman>hk-usa.com thank you for your support of our

00:03:41.157 --> 00:03:43.737
<v Riley Bowman>sponsors and of course you can always pick them up at a

00:03:43.737 --> 00:03:46.837
<v Riley Bowman>local dealer today's episode all sponsored by the

00:03:46.837 --> 00:03:51.517
<v Riley Bowman>pistol intelligence online video course which you can find at concealed carry.com

00:03:51.517 --> 00:03:55.357
<v Riley Bowman>and if you don't want to navigate your way through the site there or whatever

00:03:55.357 --> 00:04:00.257
<v Riley Bowman>you can just go to concealed carry.com forward slash piq course i'll take you

00:04:00.257 --> 00:04:04.657
<v Riley Bowman>directly to a page where you can learn more about the course and sign up for it if you'd like.

00:04:05.677 --> 00:04:08.577
<v Riley Bowman>But Guardian Nation members, I should tell you, if you're already a Guardian

00:04:08.577 --> 00:04:11.077
<v Riley Bowman>Nation member, you already have access to it. You should take advantage of that.

00:04:11.617 --> 00:04:13.677
<v Riley Bowman>But you are welcome to buy the course a la carte.

00:04:14.537 --> 00:04:18.577
<v Riley Bowman>I think the link I just gave you actually puts you on a landing page where you

00:04:18.577 --> 00:04:24.697
<v Riley Bowman>can buy the course and get 100 pack of the Pistol IQ targets along with it. Yeah, it's a bundle.

00:04:24.997 --> 00:04:26.937
<v Riley Bowman>So it's a pretty good deal when you go that way too. I mean,

00:04:26.977 --> 00:04:31.317
<v Riley Bowman>the course ends up being like 20 bucks or something because you're already getting $50 worth of targets.

00:04:31.777 --> 00:04:37.057
<v Riley Bowman>But anyway, guys, check out the Pistol IQ course online at concealedcarry.com.

00:04:37.837 --> 00:04:41.177
<v Riley Bowman>That's going to make sense to you as we talk about today's topic, too.

00:04:41.977 --> 00:04:47.137
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, I teach about the very things in that course that we're going to talk

00:04:47.137 --> 00:04:50.297
<v Riley Bowman>about here today. You'll actually see some of that inaction in the course.

00:04:50.777 --> 00:04:54.857
<v Riley Bowman>And for whatever reason, Jacob's been through the course. And even with that,

00:04:54.957 --> 00:04:57.997
<v Riley Bowman>he had some aha moments recently. And that's what we're here to talk about today.

00:04:59.265 --> 00:05:05.965
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes. I mean, the most recent thing that happened is I got some vernacular to

00:05:05.965 --> 00:05:08.565
<v Jacob Paulsen>describe an aha moment that I had several years ago.

00:05:09.085 --> 00:05:15.365
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, you know, we were at TACON in Dallas several weeks ago and you used some verbiage.

00:05:15.645 --> 00:05:20.105
<v Jacob Paulsen>You basically said passive versus active recoil management.

00:05:20.445 --> 00:05:23.685
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I just never heard those words from you or anyone for that matter.

00:05:23.685 --> 00:05:27.645
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I was like, huh, yeah, like those are the words that describe the thing

00:05:27.645 --> 00:05:29.785
<v Jacob Paulsen>I've been thinking about for years.

00:05:29.985 --> 00:05:32.325
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know, like that's been impactful for me.

00:05:32.685 --> 00:05:35.305
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this was the moment I was just like, you know what, now that I have these

00:05:35.305 --> 00:05:39.425
<v Jacob Paulsen>words that I think describe this concept really well, I'm going to go write about it.

00:05:39.565 --> 00:05:47.105
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so, yeah, I published a little article on our site on this topic with that language in mind.

00:05:47.605 --> 00:05:53.045
<v Riley Bowman>It was really interesting to me because, and I think I actually want to talk

00:05:53.045 --> 00:05:58.505
<v Riley Bowman>about this other thing a little bit as it relates to what you're describing right now.

00:05:58.885 --> 00:06:01.605
<v Riley Bowman>And I'll describe what that is. And then what that is, I mean,

00:06:01.805 --> 00:06:09.285
<v Riley Bowman>sorry, what that is, is I was surprised when you had me go through your article

00:06:09.285 --> 00:06:12.325
<v Riley Bowman>and I read it, of course, and you wanted to make sure that you got everything

00:06:12.325 --> 00:06:14.745
<v Riley Bowman>correct and accurate. And so I reviewed it.

00:06:16.145 --> 00:06:21.145
<v Riley Bowman>And I was surprised because you're like, I don't remember hearing the words passive and active.

00:06:21.405 --> 00:06:25.165
<v Riley Bowman>And I'm like, I know I've said those words before. Talk about recoil.

00:06:25.465 --> 00:06:27.125
<v Jacob Paulsen>But we all know my memory is crap.

00:06:27.245 --> 00:06:33.085
<v Riley Bowman>So that's a thing too. But here's what I'm really getting at is there are times

00:06:33.085 --> 00:06:34.325
<v Riley Bowman>I've experienced it myself.

00:06:34.385 --> 00:06:40.345
<v Riley Bowman>You go to a course, a seminar, whatever, or you're just watching a YouTube video.

00:06:41.198 --> 00:06:45.358
<v Riley Bowman>And it's not even about anything that's particularly new to you necessarily.

00:06:47.118 --> 00:06:50.498
<v Riley Bowman>Maybe 90% of it's like review. You're like, ah, I've heard this before.

00:06:50.718 --> 00:06:53.138
<v Riley Bowman>But then there'll be this one little nugget, this one little phrase,

00:06:53.298 --> 00:06:58.118
<v Riley Bowman>a word even, that is like, I mean, it just, it suddenly clicks.

00:06:59.098 --> 00:07:03.698
<v Riley Bowman>You identify with it. It just hits you in a way or in a moment or whatever.

00:07:03.698 --> 00:07:07.258
<v Riley Bowman>Or it could entirely be something, too, where, you know, two years ago,

00:07:07.398 --> 00:07:12.338
<v Riley Bowman>five years ago, 10 years ago, when you were learning such and such concept that

00:07:12.338 --> 00:07:13.858
<v Riley Bowman>you just weren't quite ready.

00:07:14.518 --> 00:07:17.038
<v Riley Bowman>Like, you're just in a different place now, a different perspective,

00:07:17.218 --> 00:07:18.458
<v Riley Bowman>a different level of understanding.

00:07:19.818 --> 00:07:23.418
<v Riley Bowman>And, you know, all of a sudden, you know, maybe you heard something similar

00:07:23.418 --> 00:07:25.938
<v Riley Bowman>the same or even the same way 10 years prior.

00:07:26.798 --> 00:07:30.358
<v Riley Bowman>But it just didn't quite click. It didn't make sense. It didn't jive,

00:07:30.458 --> 00:07:35.358
<v Riley Bowman>you know. So that's where I actually wanted to start today was just pointing that out.

00:07:35.558 --> 00:07:40.838
<v Riley Bowman>I think that's worth noting that I think for all of us, and I'm talking about

00:07:40.838 --> 00:07:43.458
<v Riley Bowman>you and me, and I'm talking about those listening and watching the podcast,

00:07:43.458 --> 00:07:49.078
<v Riley Bowman>it's a good life lesson to not think you know all the things all the time,

00:07:49.278 --> 00:07:51.638
<v Riley Bowman>including about topics that you think you already know about.

00:07:53.098 --> 00:07:56.198
<v Riley Bowman>Because I've heard people make the comment to me like, oh, I don't know that

00:07:56.198 --> 00:08:01.678
<v Riley Bowman>I want to go take class such and such from instructor so-and-so because it sounds

00:08:01.678 --> 00:08:06.018
<v Riley Bowman>like it's already something I know or I already understand. And,

00:08:06.854 --> 00:08:10.134
<v Riley Bowman>I can understand that. I can relate to that because I've been there, done that.

00:08:10.414 --> 00:08:15.534
<v Riley Bowman>But I've also signed up for classes that I, upon reading the class description,

00:08:15.874 --> 00:08:19.754
<v Riley Bowman>I'm reading it and I'm just thinking, well, it doesn't sound particularly,

00:08:19.754 --> 00:08:23.374
<v Riley Bowman>you know, whoa, like I really need that class.

00:08:23.374 --> 00:08:27.374
<v Riley Bowman>But it was more about taking the class from that instructor because I wanted

00:08:27.374 --> 00:08:28.934
<v Riley Bowman>to see how they taught it.

00:08:29.354 --> 00:08:32.954
<v Riley Bowman>And then so I went there in the perspective of I want to see how this other

00:08:32.954 --> 00:08:36.514
<v Riley Bowman>instructor teaches something, you know, that may be similar to how I even teach,

00:08:36.714 --> 00:08:38.114
<v Riley Bowman>but I want to see how they do it.

00:08:38.434 --> 00:08:43.154
<v Riley Bowman>And then they say something in that course that is like, whoa,

00:08:43.754 --> 00:08:47.254
<v Riley Bowman>boom, light bulb moment. And it's like lightning.

00:08:48.274 --> 00:08:52.034
<v Riley Bowman>Because and i'm not i'm not because i'm not expecting it that's probably one

00:08:52.034 --> 00:08:54.874
<v Riley Bowman>one thing because i'm i'm trying to view it from this other perspective and

00:08:54.874 --> 00:08:59.614
<v Riley Bowman>all of a sudden something just hits me out of nowhere and it's like whoa okay

00:08:59.614 --> 00:09:03.914
<v Riley Bowman>and now i understand something new yeah yeah i was you know and i think that's

00:09:03.914 --> 00:09:05.914
<v Riley Bowman>a really cool thing about learning these things.

00:09:05.914 --> 00:09:09.494
<v Jacob Paulsen>Are all journeys right and i think that i think that the the perspective you

00:09:09.494 --> 00:09:12.394
<v Jacob Paulsen>have to have you know what i'll add to what you said or how i'll respond to

00:09:12.394 --> 00:09:15.874
<v Jacob Paulsen>what you just said is the the critical perspective here is just acknowledging

00:09:15.874 --> 00:09:20.434
<v Jacob Paulsen>that we never understand any concept at a complete level.

00:09:20.954 --> 00:09:24.894
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like whatever it is you already know or have learned, you can learn that at

00:09:24.894 --> 00:09:27.074
<v Jacob Paulsen>a deeper level in a more significant way.

00:09:27.394 --> 00:09:29.354
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it's always a journey.

00:09:29.814 --> 00:09:32.214
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this particular thing, which we haven't really defined yet,

00:09:32.354 --> 00:09:36.454
<v Jacob Paulsen>this active versus passive recoil management thing, I think that the first clue

00:09:36.454 --> 00:09:40.534
<v Jacob Paulsen>for me was something I missed completely, and it was Rob Latham.

00:09:41.574 --> 00:09:46.294
<v Jacob Paulsen>Rob Latham, I think this was an in-person thing. I think we were at a shot show

00:09:46.294 --> 00:09:49.074
<v Jacob Paulsen>in the Springfield Bay, Industry Day at the Range.

00:09:49.714 --> 00:09:52.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>Or maybe it was a YouTube video. I can't remember.

00:09:54.274 --> 00:09:57.314
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it was Rob Latham who said it. And he basically said something like,

00:09:58.514 --> 00:10:00.754
<v Jacob Paulsen>someone asked him something about recoil management.

00:10:00.814 --> 00:10:04.214
<v Jacob Paulsen>And he basically said, what's the big deal? Just let it kick.

00:10:04.334 --> 00:10:05.114
<v Jacob Paulsen>Just let it recoil. Yeah.

00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:10.160
<v Jacob Paulsen>And at the time, I remember thinking, no. I don't understand what he's saying

00:10:10.160 --> 00:10:11.680
<v Jacob Paulsen>because that does not compute.

00:10:11.940 --> 00:10:15.780
<v Jacob Paulsen>That does not jive with the files in my brain because the files in my brain

00:10:15.780 --> 00:10:18.140
<v Jacob Paulsen>say the recoil is bad and we have to stop the recoil.

00:10:18.480 --> 00:10:22.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>So that was the first clue. And looking back on it now, I look back and I'm like, okay.

00:10:23.960 --> 00:10:27.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>At some point, that started to click a little bit. But at that moment,

00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:33.640
<v Jacob Paulsen>at that time, which was probably something like 2016 or 2017 or something, it didn't jive.

00:10:34.100 --> 00:10:37.320
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'll give you another clue in the journey I was at

00:10:38.300 --> 00:10:42.280
<v Jacob Paulsen>an event I don't think I should be specific I was at an event,

00:10:42.320 --> 00:10:45.700
<v Jacob Paulsen>it was a conference style event and there were lots of instructors teaching

00:10:45.700 --> 00:10:49.980
<v Jacob Paulsen>lots of classes and there was one particular class being taught by one particular instructor and

00:10:51.280 --> 00:10:55.500
<v Jacob Paulsen>it was a recoil management course it was basically like how can you do a mag

00:10:55.500 --> 00:11:00.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>dump and put them all through the same hole in the target do do do do do do

00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:04.080
<v Jacob Paulsen>do And it was a loud class to behold, in fact.

00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:09.120
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I remember watching, and this guy, he was teaching all these techniques

00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:12.640
<v Jacob Paulsen>to basically keep the gun shooting as flat as possible.

00:11:13.020 --> 00:11:15.180
<v Jacob Paulsen>That was the jam. That was the class.

00:11:16.780 --> 00:11:21.900
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think that at some point in your journey, shooting flat sounds like the best thing.

00:11:22.280 --> 00:11:25.140
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think that we even, you see comments on social, it's like,

00:11:25.180 --> 00:11:26.820
<v Jacob Paulsen>look how flat shooting that gun is.

00:11:26.840 --> 00:11:30.880
<v Jacob Paulsen>Or look how well you are at shooting that gun flat. right?

00:11:31.080 --> 00:11:33.860
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like that's a desirable outcome to have a flat shooting gun.

00:11:34.380 --> 00:11:39.380
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so I'm in this class and this dude's doing it, doing the thing. And I,

00:11:40.316 --> 00:11:44.436
<v Jacob Paulsen>The guy who was teaching the class looked like a linebacker.

00:11:45.116 --> 00:11:47.896
<v Jacob Paulsen>He was just ripped. He still is.

00:11:48.636 --> 00:11:51.956
<v Jacob Paulsen>Anyway, just a ripped dude. I looked at that cat and I was like,

00:11:52.416 --> 00:11:53.556
<v Jacob Paulsen>bro spends time in the gym.

00:11:54.336 --> 00:11:57.916
<v Jacob Paulsen>And a lot of it, or has been, or has. And I do not look like that.

00:11:58.416 --> 00:12:02.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>For those who are not watching the video, I am not a guy who looks like he hangs out in the gym.

00:12:03.256 --> 00:12:06.696
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I remember looking at him and thinking, well, that's easy for you.

00:12:07.316 --> 00:12:10.136
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right like i get that there's techniques you know that all

00:12:10.136 --> 00:12:13.796
<v Jacob Paulsen>of us can employ to try and make the gun more flat shooting but

00:12:13.796 --> 00:12:16.536
<v Jacob Paulsen>like i just am not going to be capable of doing it the

00:12:16.536 --> 00:12:19.636
<v Jacob Paulsen>way you are capable of doing it i don't have i don't

00:12:19.636 --> 00:12:22.396
<v Jacob Paulsen>bring to the table the assets you have and so

00:12:22.396 --> 00:12:26.036
<v Jacob Paulsen>so therefore i'll never be able to achieve the

00:12:26.036 --> 00:12:29.296
<v Jacob Paulsen>same level of performance that you're achieving yeah that's

00:12:29.296 --> 00:12:32.096
<v Jacob Paulsen>that's what i thought and i and around the same time i remember

00:12:32.096 --> 00:12:35.556
<v Jacob Paulsen>thinking the same thing about you riley i'm like looking at riley thinking hey like

00:12:35.556 --> 00:12:38.736
<v Jacob Paulsen>this is a guy who's bigger stronger you know

00:12:38.736 --> 00:12:41.596
<v Jacob Paulsen>working on his grip muscles and for these all

00:12:41.596 --> 00:12:45.216
<v Jacob Paulsen>these shooting related muscles and because he wants to be the best in his class

00:12:45.216 --> 00:12:50.356
<v Jacob Paulsen>and i i'm just not gonna invest the same amount of time into that because it's

00:12:50.356 --> 00:12:54.036
<v Jacob Paulsen>not as important to me and so therefore i will never be as good at shooting

00:12:54.036 --> 00:12:59.876
<v Jacob Paulsen>as that because i just cannot control the recoil the same as all these buff dudes can mm-hmm

00:13:00.823 --> 00:13:04.643
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, I mean, and I fell for the same trap years ago as well,

00:13:04.783 --> 00:13:10.003
<v Riley Bowman>you know, looking at really good shooters and some of whom are very strong.

00:13:10.223 --> 00:13:14.863
<v Riley Bowman>And there is, by the way, there is a correlation here that I know it was Charlie

00:13:14.863 --> 00:13:16.843
<v Riley Bowman>Perez has mentioned this, has talked about this.

00:13:16.963 --> 00:13:19.803
<v Riley Bowman>There's a few others that have talked about similar things or have done similar things.

00:13:19.983 --> 00:13:26.043
<v Riley Bowman>But like Charlie, I know has, you know, a grip, you know, strength measuring

00:13:26.043 --> 00:13:30.263
<v Riley Bowman>tool, right? So you just grasp it, and you just squeeze and see how much you

00:13:30.263 --> 00:13:31.843
<v Riley Bowman>can deliver, and it measures in pounds.

00:13:32.763 --> 00:13:35.883
<v Riley Bowman>And there's been some people that have applied some thought to this and suggested,

00:13:36.023 --> 00:13:42.143
<v Riley Bowman>well, if you can grip with at least X number of pounds, then you've got what

00:13:42.143 --> 00:13:44.243
<v Riley Bowman>it takes to grip a gun fine.

00:13:44.403 --> 00:13:46.883
<v Riley Bowman>If you can't achieve that, you're probably going to struggle a little bit.

00:13:47.003 --> 00:13:51.583
<v Riley Bowman>And I think that's a little bit of an ambiguous number, but let's just say it's

00:13:51.583 --> 00:13:53.623
<v Riley Bowman>75 to 100 pounds or whatever.

00:13:54.023 --> 00:13:54.723
<v Jacob Paulsen>Sure. Okay.

00:13:55.323 --> 00:13:58.963
<v Riley Bowman>Um what i do know is that there are some really high level shooters like i mean,

00:13:59.603 --> 00:14:02.523
<v Riley Bowman>you can look at jerry michelek and you could say well jerry doesn't

00:14:02.523 --> 00:14:05.883
<v Riley Bowman>look like he's he's a gym bro he's not a gym bro okay but i've

00:14:05.883 --> 00:14:08.763
<v Riley Bowman>i i don't remember if it was charlie or somebody else i know

00:14:08.763 --> 00:14:12.103
<v Riley Bowman>somebody's measured jerry's grip strength before and

00:14:12.103 --> 00:14:15.063
<v Riley Bowman>it is very very high i don't remember the exact number but

00:14:15.063 --> 00:14:17.883
<v Riley Bowman>it's a very very high number in terms of script strength right

00:14:17.883 --> 00:14:21.703
<v Riley Bowman>and so and some people are just they just perhaps it's

00:14:21.703 --> 00:14:25.503
<v Riley Bowman>genetics right or it could be that they grew up doing a lot of physical labor

00:14:25.503 --> 00:14:28.963
<v Riley Bowman>with their hands and arms and they just develop that grip strength or whatever

00:14:28.963 --> 00:14:33.603
<v Riley Bowman>right and so there are there's definitely a correlation of some very high level

00:14:33.603 --> 00:14:38.743
<v Riley Bowman>shooters that also have high grip strength and that,

00:14:39.533 --> 00:14:41.773
<v Riley Bowman>is definitely a help when it comes to shooting.

00:14:42.033 --> 00:14:44.153
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? Absolutely. And I mentioned this in the article. I say,

00:14:44.473 --> 00:14:46.253
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think I say it two different ways.

00:14:46.353 --> 00:14:50.953
<v Jacob Paulsen>I say, one, that there is a minimum necessary amount of strength to be able

00:14:50.953 --> 00:14:52.353
<v Jacob Paulsen>to manage the gun properly.

00:14:52.593 --> 00:14:56.693
<v Jacob Paulsen>So it's not like, there's no world where like no strength is required.

00:14:57.033 --> 00:15:01.033
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's a minimum requirement of strength. Now that's, like there's just,

00:15:01.153 --> 00:15:03.093
<v Jacob Paulsen>there's a minimum threshold you've got to be able to meet.

00:15:03.493 --> 00:15:05.593
<v Jacob Paulsen>And second thing I say in there is basically...

00:15:06.918 --> 00:15:12.018
<v Jacob Paulsen>Being stronger and healthier and more fit in any ways you want to interpret

00:15:12.018 --> 00:15:16.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>those words definitely has its advantages in shooting.

00:15:17.338 --> 00:15:20.798
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's absolutely a fact. Being stronger, having more grip strength,

00:15:20.938 --> 00:15:27.858
<v Jacob Paulsen>having more whatever physicality, all those things definitely are helpful as a shooter.

00:15:28.058 --> 00:15:31.598
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I don't mean to downplay that. But what I'm trying to contrast is like this,

00:15:31.758 --> 00:15:36.358
<v Jacob Paulsen>the perspective I had back then, this is early in this little tiny journey we're

00:15:36.358 --> 00:15:38.058
<v Jacob Paulsen>talking about with relative to recoil management.

00:15:38.778 --> 00:15:42.398
<v Jacob Paulsen>My perspective was one of like, that's a deal breaker.

00:15:42.738 --> 00:15:46.158
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, right. Right. Like I can never perform at a high level.

00:15:46.298 --> 00:15:48.118
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. Because I don't have that.

00:15:48.118 --> 00:15:52.318
<v Riley Bowman>Your ceiling of performance is like you perceived it as, you know, maxing out here.

00:15:52.578 --> 00:15:56.418
<v Riley Bowman>Right. And now you're realizing that, you know, maybe it won't be here,

00:15:56.418 --> 00:15:59.698
<v Riley Bowman>but it can get a lot closer to that than what you thought.

00:15:59.838 --> 00:16:02.538
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. You can think of it like a percentage basis, right? Whereas before I might've

00:16:02.538 --> 00:16:05.638
<v Jacob Paulsen>thought like, Hey, 40% of this is physicality. And now it's like,

00:16:05.678 --> 00:16:07.398
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, maybe, maybe it's like 3%. Yeah.

00:16:07.638 --> 00:16:11.198
<v Jacob Paulsen>You know, so, so it's just not as big of a deal as I used to think it was.

00:16:11.418 --> 00:16:14.178
<v Riley Bowman>I completely agree with that. And cause you were just saying,

00:16:14.298 --> 00:16:17.898
<v Riley Bowman>you know, there's some minimal threshold in terms of strength to be able to

00:16:17.898 --> 00:16:18.918
<v Riley Bowman>shoot a gun effectively.

00:16:18.918 --> 00:16:22.138
<v Riley Bowman>And I would actually even push back against that a little bit because in some

00:16:22.138 --> 00:16:26.058
<v Riley Bowman>experimentation I've done with where I've were and I've even done some demonstrations

00:16:26.058 --> 00:16:31.658
<v Riley Bowman>in class and I'm thinking about doing it more just a basic demo in some of my

00:16:31.658 --> 00:16:38.198
<v Riley Bowman>pistol IQ classes to to prove a point here that it really is about this thing

00:16:38.198 --> 00:16:38.978
<v Riley Bowman>we're going to talk about,

00:16:39.198 --> 00:16:41.778
<v Riley Bowman>which is I'm not going to spill the beans just yet.

00:16:41.778 --> 00:16:47.258
<v Riley Bowman>But where I've done some demonstrations where I apply a very weak grip to the gun,

00:16:47.418 --> 00:16:52.118
<v Riley Bowman>and usually I'm showing one thing, but I can use that to show another thing,

00:16:52.178 --> 00:16:58.878
<v Riley Bowman>which is I can show you just how fast a person can shoot, even with almost no grip on the gun at all.

00:16:59.178 --> 00:17:00.818
<v Jacob Paulsen>There's still a minimum required strength there.

00:17:01.517 --> 00:17:07.517
<v Riley Bowman>Minimum but i mean it's it's a very low i would say that almost i would say that anybody can.

00:17:07.517 --> 00:17:09.037
<v Jacob Paulsen>Achieve i'd say any adult can probably

00:17:09.037 --> 00:17:10.077
<v Riley Bowman>Achieve yeah any any.

00:17:10.077 --> 00:17:13.217
<v Jacob Paulsen>Adult's going to show up to the range with the minimum necessary strength to get

00:17:13.217 --> 00:17:16.157
<v Riley Bowman>This done yeah there's a little bit of a contrast here i'd like to also bring

00:17:16.157 --> 00:17:19.957
<v Riley Bowman>into the discussion um you know you were talking about okay there's definitely

00:17:19.957 --> 00:17:25.417
<v Riley Bowman>a correlation that there's some high high performers who also have this high

00:17:25.417 --> 00:17:30.097
<v Riley Bowman>grip strength and that certainly helps them um i want to bring into the discussion

00:17:30.097 --> 00:17:32.857
<v Riley Bowman>a little bit another real-life example,

00:17:33.137 --> 00:17:37.877
<v Riley Bowman>which happens to be a couple of little girls out of southern Utah by the name

00:17:37.877 --> 00:17:43.757
<v Riley Bowman>of Justine and Jalise Williams, who are, I think at this point,

00:17:43.957 --> 00:17:45.317
<v Riley Bowman>they are pretty, you know,

00:17:45.897 --> 00:17:51.697
<v Riley Bowman>single or unanimously declared as the winningest female pistol shooters.

00:17:52.497 --> 00:17:56.517
<v Riley Bowman>Well, certainly in the case of Jalise, a lot of Justine's titles have been on

00:17:56.517 --> 00:17:58.777
<v Riley Bowman>the PCC side, but even still,

00:17:59.137 --> 00:18:02.177
<v Riley Bowman>Justine has won a number of titles in carry

00:18:02.177 --> 00:18:05.057
<v Riley Bowman>optics division and other things right and when you see

00:18:05.057 --> 00:18:07.817
<v Riley Bowman>where they finish they're also finishing right

00:18:07.817 --> 00:18:10.477
<v Riley Bowman>there i mean right with some of the

00:18:10.477 --> 00:18:14.437
<v Riley Bowman>top guys at nationals and stuff like that and they

00:18:14.437 --> 00:18:18.497
<v Riley Bowman>are like barely well in the case of jayleason she's like i don't know five foot

00:18:18.497 --> 00:18:23.017
<v Riley Bowman>five foot one maybe little little girls you know i mean they're not girls anymore

00:18:23.017 --> 00:18:28.057
<v Riley Bowman>they're they're they're women but they are compared to you know the frank proctor

00:18:28.057 --> 00:18:31.557
<v Riley Bowman>somebody I was just commenting about Frank or Mike C.

00:18:31.717 --> 00:18:34.457
<v Riley Bowman>Klander or, you know, whomever.

00:18:34.757 --> 00:18:40.917
<v Riley Bowman>Like they were talking about a large size disparity, arguably strength disparity,

00:18:40.917 --> 00:18:43.457
<v Riley Bowman>but yet they are shooting very effectively.

00:18:43.457 --> 00:18:49.937
<v Riley Bowman>And so I'm just bringing that to bear that in this discussion that you can be

00:18:49.937 --> 00:18:56.517
<v Riley Bowman>a five foot tall, you know, young lady that isn't necessarily, you know,

00:18:56.777 --> 00:19:00.837
<v Riley Bowman>a weakling by any stretch of the imagination, but not what you necessarily consider to be strong.

00:19:00.837 --> 00:19:02.177
<v Jacob Paulsen>But does not look like a Marine.

00:19:02.437 --> 00:19:05.117
<v Riley Bowman>Right. Exactly. And yet they can compete in.

00:19:05.955 --> 00:19:12.975
<v Riley Bowman>You know 85 90 you know sometimes even plus 90 percent of the winners at nationals

00:19:12.975 --> 00:19:16.135
<v Riley Bowman>which is not a small feat i'm just going to point out.

00:19:16.135 --> 00:19:20.515
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean the higher up you go in the scale of performance the more every little

00:19:20.515 --> 00:19:24.295
<v Jacob Paulsen>tiny advantage matters of course right so when you're competing at that level

00:19:24.295 --> 00:19:26.095
<v Jacob Paulsen>like all this stuff becomes really

00:19:26.095 --> 00:19:30.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>important because any little squeak of performance you can get it matters.

00:19:32.275 --> 00:19:36.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>But, you know, like broadly speaking, when we're talking about an acceptable

00:19:36.995 --> 00:19:42.855
<v Jacob Paulsen>performance level, like I look at my objective in my training not to be the

00:19:42.855 --> 00:19:44.655
<v Jacob Paulsen>guy who can go win USPSA Nationals.

00:19:44.735 --> 00:19:49.575
<v Jacob Paulsen>I look at my objective of being a guy who is, you know, more than capable of

00:19:49.575 --> 00:19:52.895
<v Jacob Paulsen>stepping up to the bat and hitting a home run, right, in a defensive fight.

00:19:52.995 --> 00:19:55.595
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like I don't need to be the home run derby winner.

00:19:55.855 --> 00:20:00.415
<v Jacob Paulsen>I don't care if I'm on the all-star team. I just want to be capable of swinging

00:20:00.415 --> 00:20:01.435
<v Jacob Paulsen>the thing and getting a home run.

00:20:01.655 --> 00:20:05.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>So, so that, you know, that's, that's how I look at this. And I think that recoil

00:20:05.195 --> 00:20:07.375
<v Jacob Paulsen>management is pretty critical in that context.

00:20:07.835 --> 00:20:11.035
<v Riley Bowman>Oh, for sure. I think, you know, it's one of the.

00:20:13.256 --> 00:20:17.036
<v Riley Bowman>Earliest things i mean that becomes relevant in what

00:20:17.036 --> 00:20:19.936
<v Riley Bowman>i teach over a two-day pistol intelligence course is sort

00:20:19.936 --> 00:20:23.316
<v Riley Bowman>of like i mean we talk about accuracy and

00:20:23.316 --> 00:20:27.436
<v Riley Bowman>we and we you know we do a little bit of a warm-up with that but we jump right

00:20:27.436 --> 00:20:32.236
<v Riley Bowman>into grip and recoil management because that's kind of the foundation i think

00:20:32.236 --> 00:20:38.576
<v Riley Bowman>of good shooting um if you can manage recoil in such a way that the gun behaves

00:20:38.576 --> 00:20:43.136
<v Riley Bowman>predictably and returns back to target for every shot or after every shot.

00:20:44.116 --> 00:20:48.656
<v Riley Bowman>There's really almost nothing you can't do with that gun at that point.

00:20:49.176 --> 00:20:53.296
<v Riley Bowman>And I think that's where I wanted to go next, Jacob, is one of the big kind

00:20:53.296 --> 00:20:56.456
<v Riley Bowman>of breakthroughs in this mindset shift for you.

00:20:56.736 --> 00:21:00.236
<v Riley Bowman>And this is what you started with in your article is basically asking the question.

00:21:00.296 --> 00:21:02.476
<v Riley Bowman>It's actually the title of the article, by the way. If you guys want to go read

00:21:02.476 --> 00:21:04.636
<v Riley Bowman>it for yourself, you can go to concealedcarry.com.

00:21:04.756 --> 00:21:07.996
<v Riley Bowman>It was published on April 4th of this year, 2026.

00:21:08.336 --> 00:21:11.356
<v Riley Bowman>And it's titled, Can You Reset the Trigger Faster Than the Gun Cycles?

00:21:12.056 --> 00:21:16.296
<v Riley Bowman>And that's really the question. And so you're like, can I reset the trigger

00:21:16.296 --> 00:21:21.156
<v Riley Bowman>on my gun faster than the gun recoils back and the slide comes back forward?

00:21:21.776 --> 00:21:24.696
<v Riley Bowman>Can I reset it that fast? No, I cannot.

00:21:25.536 --> 00:21:33.236
<v Riley Bowman>And so therefore, it made this shift, it sounds like, in understanding that, well,

00:21:33.436 --> 00:21:36.896
<v Riley Bowman>if I can't reset the trigger any faster than the gun cycles,

00:21:36.896 --> 00:21:44.716
<v Riley Bowman>If during the course of the gun cycling, it basically comes back to target somehow, some way, then...

00:21:46.231 --> 00:21:48.071
<v Riley Bowman>Then you're good, right?

00:21:48.211 --> 00:21:49.371
<v Jacob Paulsen>I would think of it this way.

00:21:49.631 --> 00:21:50.151
<v Riley Bowman>Expand upon that.

00:21:50.331 --> 00:21:54.011
<v Jacob Paulsen>Here's another way of describing this. Let's imagine in a theoretic scenario

00:21:54.011 --> 00:21:59.131
<v Jacob Paulsen>that I had whatever strength is necessary to hold a gun and shoot it and that

00:21:59.131 --> 00:22:00.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>it would experience zero lift.

00:22:01.871 --> 00:22:04.971
<v Jacob Paulsen>It would be literally flat shooting.

00:22:05.691 --> 00:22:11.291
<v Jacob Paulsen>So let's just imagine that, that I am capable of that level of feet, physical strength.

00:22:11.671 --> 00:22:14.531
<v Jacob Paulsen>So if I could do that, would I

00:22:14.531 --> 00:22:17.351
<v Jacob Paulsen>then be able to reset the trigger faster than the slide could

00:22:17.351 --> 00:22:20.871
<v Jacob Paulsen>get back into battery no right so

00:22:20.871 --> 00:22:23.591
<v Jacob Paulsen>okay then let's just assume for a second and this is

00:22:23.591 --> 00:22:26.251
<v Jacob Paulsen>where the other half of this breakthrough comes well the other half of this

00:22:26.251 --> 00:22:29.091
<v Jacob Paulsen>particular part of it let's assume then

00:22:29.091 --> 00:22:31.851
<v Jacob Paulsen>that i i don't let i don't have

00:22:31.851 --> 00:22:34.871
<v Jacob Paulsen>hold the gun so extraordinarily strongly that it's

00:22:34.871 --> 00:22:38.231
<v Jacob Paulsen>flat but it just like it just recoils like it just whatever like

00:22:38.231 --> 00:22:41.371
<v Jacob Paulsen>normal energy would exercise with a very lame

00:22:41.371 --> 00:22:44.091
<v Jacob Paulsen>weak grip uh that it would you know come up and

00:22:44.091 --> 00:22:47.531
<v Jacob Paulsen>slide would go to the rear and hits rears point then it starts to return forward with

00:22:47.531 --> 00:22:50.771
<v Jacob Paulsen>the energy from the spring and comes with its most forward point goes into battery

00:22:50.771 --> 00:22:55.591
<v Jacob Paulsen>in that scenario could i reset the trigger faster than the gun and recoils no

00:22:55.591 --> 00:23:01.351
<v Jacob Paulsen>no so so it's like then if that's the case then then me shooting it flatter

00:23:01.351 --> 00:23:06.971
<v Jacob Paulsen>than other other people can does not allow me to get the next shot any faster

00:23:08.311 --> 00:23:11.031
<v Riley Bowman>Yes as far as that trigger pieces is.

00:23:11.031 --> 00:23:15.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>Concerned yeah i mean side acquisition something else But I cannot reset the

00:23:15.891 --> 00:23:20.551
<v Jacob Paulsen>trigger faster than the gun could recoil, even if it was flat.

00:23:21.946 --> 00:23:26.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>So then it's sort of irrelevant then, right? Like there's some elapsed period

00:23:26.166 --> 00:23:28.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>of time during which the gun's going to recoil.

00:23:28.586 --> 00:23:31.326
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in that elapsed period of time, and it's a range depending on,

00:23:31.406 --> 00:23:35.246
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know, arguably, you know, how strong you can hold it.

00:23:35.386 --> 00:23:39.306
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it's kind of sort of not really a range either because the gun cycles,

00:23:39.586 --> 00:23:40.666
<v Jacob Paulsen>the speed the gun cycles.

00:23:41.006 --> 00:23:44.286
<v Jacob Paulsen>The question is, you know, how I'm holding it. So whatever, you could say it's

00:23:44.286 --> 00:23:46.966
<v Jacob Paulsen>a range or you could say it's kind of really a finite period of time.

00:23:46.966 --> 00:23:51.326
<v Jacob Paulsen>Whatever that that time is or range of time is i'm not resetting the trigger

00:23:51.326 --> 00:23:53.286
<v Jacob Paulsen>fast yeah it's just not going to

00:23:53.286 --> 00:23:58.386
<v Riley Bowman>Happen i mean well i mean to for those that are mathematically minded individuals

00:23:58.386 --> 00:24:04.426
<v Riley Bowman>they like numbers uh this is just a rough ballpark okay because there's going

00:24:04.426 --> 00:24:10.046
<v Riley Bowman>to yes uh recoil spring strength and you know or specific mass and the load

00:24:10.046 --> 00:24:12.306
<v Riley Bowman>you're shooting and all that is going to be a factor in this,

00:24:12.446 --> 00:24:15.126
<v Riley Bowman>but your typical handgun,

00:24:15.646 --> 00:24:18.746
<v Riley Bowman>semi-automatic handgun is going to cycle or reciprocate.

00:24:18.946 --> 00:24:23.126
<v Riley Bowman>So slide going back, slide coming back forward and into battery is going to

00:24:23.126 --> 00:24:26.226
<v Riley Bowman>happen in about six hundredths, maybe seven hundredths of a second. Right.

00:24:26.306 --> 00:24:29.266
<v Jacob Paulsen>And no one on earth is getting split times that fast.

00:24:29.366 --> 00:24:29.906
<v Riley Bowman>Not with a pistol.

00:24:30.046 --> 00:24:32.746
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like you can't outrun it. Like this is how some people describe this.

00:24:32.826 --> 00:24:34.126
<v Jacob Paulsen>People say you can't outrun the gun, right?

00:24:34.326 --> 00:24:37.366
<v Jacob Paulsen>You can't, your finger cannot move fast

00:24:37.366 --> 00:24:40.706
<v Jacob Paulsen>enough to to press

00:24:40.706 --> 00:24:43.486
<v Jacob Paulsen>the trigger faster than the gun can get back in the back yeah that's not

00:24:43.486 --> 00:24:47.766
<v Jacob Paulsen>happening right i mean there are people out there who are cranking down sometimes

00:24:47.766 --> 00:24:54.106
<v Jacob Paulsen>0.10 0.11 0.12 you know that that's that's like unbelievable that's like bragging

00:24:54.106 --> 00:24:58.486
<v Jacob Paulsen>right stuff right but i mean if you're the 0.14 0.15 0.16 we're like dang that

00:24:58.486 --> 00:25:02.166
<v Jacob Paulsen>dude moves his finger pretty freaking fast right so so point point zero

00:25:02.166 --> 00:25:07.406
<v Riley Bowman>Six yep so that's the point is that no matter like jerry who is well regarded

00:25:07.406 --> 00:25:13.606
<v Riley Bowman>for having a very fast trigger finger i mean he's his fastest is typically point one oh yeah.

00:25:13.606 --> 00:25:14.786
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah he's not out running the

00:25:14.786 --> 00:25:21.686
<v Riley Bowman>Gun like when he's really burning it down so he's still you know 40 slower right

00:25:21.686 --> 00:25:23.386
<v Riley Bowman>then that gun is cycling and.

00:25:23.386 --> 00:25:26.086
<v Jacob Paulsen>I and i can't shoot before the trigger can reset

00:25:26.823 --> 00:25:30.843
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right. And it's just not an option available to me. Like the gun has,

00:25:30.963 --> 00:25:33.543
<v Jacob Paulsen>the trigger has to reset before I can fire the next shot.

00:25:33.743 --> 00:25:37.803
<v Jacob Paulsen>So however long recoil takes, I know that my trigger reset will take longer.

00:25:38.723 --> 00:25:43.063
<v Jacob Paulsen>So with that in mind, all of a sudden I start to ask myself like,

00:25:43.303 --> 00:25:45.823
<v Jacob Paulsen>well, then why am I fighting the recoil?

00:25:46.123 --> 00:25:51.223
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like what do I gain by experiencing less lift in the gun?

00:25:51.663 --> 00:25:55.223
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the answer is probably near nothing.

00:25:55.583 --> 00:25:59.003
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, there's a potential argument there that there is potential gain.

00:25:59.183 --> 00:26:05.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>But sticking with my breakthrough from many years ago, the real moment this

00:26:05.283 --> 00:26:11.083
<v Jacob Paulsen>really started to jive for me was more like 2020, 2021, 2022-ish.

00:26:11.263 --> 00:26:13.583
<v Jacob Paulsen>It was like when this really started to hit hard for me.

00:26:14.443 --> 00:26:17.703
<v Jacob Paulsen>And when those breakthroughs were coming...

00:26:18.874 --> 00:26:24.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>And practically, for me, it was irrelevant how much recoil the gun had.

00:26:25.274 --> 00:26:27.454
<v Jacob Paulsen>Here's the other half of understanding this, and I think that a lot of people

00:26:27.454 --> 00:26:28.694
<v Jacob Paulsen>listening to this might be helpful.

00:26:29.514 --> 00:26:32.634
<v Jacob Paulsen>You mentioned you sometimes have or that you would like to do more demos like

00:26:32.634 --> 00:26:37.254
<v Jacob Paulsen>this, but in every class I teach, and I just taught one on Saturday, I do a demo.

00:26:37.614 --> 00:26:41.774
<v Jacob Paulsen>And in this demo, I hold the gun with the least amount of purchase I can put

00:26:41.774 --> 00:26:44.534
<v Jacob Paulsen>on a handgun, and I fire it.

00:26:45.054 --> 00:26:47.814
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so you know usually that means my thumbs around the

00:26:47.814 --> 00:26:51.934
<v Jacob Paulsen>back of the grip and my my trigger fingers on the trigger and my other three

00:26:51.934 --> 00:26:55.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>fingers are not touching the gun at all yeah and i fire it yep i do this with

00:26:55.954 --> 00:27:01.014
<v Jacob Paulsen>a nine millimeter handgun and uh i try and do it with a i usually do it with

00:27:01.014 --> 00:27:05.234
<v Jacob Paulsen>a full-size gun a little heavier gun seems to help the demo a little bit but the point is illustrate

00:27:05.894 --> 00:27:10.234
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know it's part of this concept we're talking about and and the key or what

00:27:10.234 --> 00:27:12.414
<v Jacob Paulsen>i'm trying to communicate right now is for people who have never done this,

00:27:12.594 --> 00:27:17.154
<v Jacob Paulsen>what would really surprise you, what surprises my students is how little recoil there is at all.

00:27:17.834 --> 00:27:22.434
<v Jacob Paulsen>If you don't attempt to mitigate recoil at all, if you just allow it to completely

00:27:22.434 --> 00:27:26.394
<v Jacob Paulsen>happen, like you put no reverse energy into the lift of the gun,

00:27:26.554 --> 00:27:27.954
<v Jacob Paulsen>how high do you think it's going to lift?

00:27:28.334 --> 00:27:31.194
<v Jacob Paulsen>And the answer is a lot less than you think.

00:27:31.634 --> 00:27:34.794
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's because we've all seen these YouTube videos of guns flying out of

00:27:34.794 --> 00:27:36.994
<v Jacob Paulsen>people's hands and hitting them in the face or whatever.

00:27:37.294 --> 00:27:43.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we love to share those videos and it's hilarious but in an actual practical

00:27:43.834 --> 00:27:48.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>way if you just let the gun recoil it really doesn't lift that high

00:27:49.714 --> 00:27:55.834
<v Jacob Paulsen>You do a drill in the PIQ course I took your course the first time I think in

00:27:56.783 --> 00:28:00.263
<v Jacob Paulsen>It might have been 2023 or 2024. I can't remember now.

00:28:00.843 --> 00:28:04.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>It doesn't matter. And when we first did this drill, this was really kind of

00:28:04.283 --> 00:28:07.043
<v Jacob Paulsen>like, it was putting a lot of icing on the cake for me in this concept.

00:28:07.603 --> 00:28:10.123
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you call it the recoil recalibration drill. And I'm not going to describe

00:28:10.123 --> 00:28:11.983
<v Jacob Paulsen>it here on the podcast. People are going to watch the video.

00:28:12.303 --> 00:28:16.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>But it was helping me understand that we just let it recoil.

00:28:17.423 --> 00:28:21.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>And most shooters, by the way, can suck at this drill. It's hard to actually

00:28:21.523 --> 00:28:23.443
<v Jacob Paulsen>allow yourself to let the gun just do the thing.

00:28:23.663 --> 00:28:27.003
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so if you're listening to this, I would encourage you, Just see what happens

00:28:27.003 --> 00:28:28.283
<v Jacob Paulsen>when you just let the gun lift.

00:28:28.623 --> 00:28:31.903
<v Jacob Paulsen>Just let it do it. Let it take its natural course of movement.

00:28:32.063 --> 00:28:35.743
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I think that you'd be shocked to be like, oh, it actually doesn't lift that much.

00:28:35.843 --> 00:28:40.543
<v Jacob Paulsen>So all of a sudden, all this energy and mind power that I've been putting into

00:28:40.543 --> 00:28:47.963
<v Jacob Paulsen>trying to keep the muzzle from rising, I'm really not doing hardly anything that matters.

00:28:50.526 --> 00:28:57.886
<v Riley Bowman>No, you're spot on with that. And that's, I think, was it the recoil recalibration exercise that,

00:28:58.126 --> 00:29:03.626
<v Riley Bowman>I remember when we had the Pistol IQ course filmed, there was a problem where

00:29:03.626 --> 00:29:06.606
<v Riley Bowman>one of the drills or exercises got missed.

00:29:07.046 --> 00:29:12.026
<v Riley Bowman>And as I told Corey, our video guy, Mike, we got to go back and we got to film that.

00:29:12.186 --> 00:29:15.486
<v Riley Bowman>Like it has to be in the course. Like it's that critical, I think.

00:29:16.006 --> 00:29:19.106
<v Riley Bowman>Without it, there's a lot of other things that just don't work or don't make sense.

00:29:19.626 --> 00:29:24.046
<v Riley Bowman>And so i think i think it was that one i could be wrong but that's what seems

00:29:24.046 --> 00:29:29.566
<v Riley Bowman>to be in there in my memory uh and so that is a really key thing yes pistol

00:29:29.566 --> 00:29:33.086
<v Riley Bowman>intelligence course video you can go watch it online and you can see what we're

00:29:33.086 --> 00:29:35.446
<v Riley Bowman>talking about and hopefully it starts to make some sense.

00:29:37.166 --> 00:29:41.626
<v Riley Bowman>That's the reason why i do that is i have found in my experience so many shooters,

00:29:42.526 --> 00:29:46.366
<v Riley Bowman>whether they've been trained this way or intuitively

00:29:46.366 --> 00:29:52.366
<v Riley Bowman>they do this because first time you shoot a gun like ever you're like bang like

00:29:52.366 --> 00:29:58.446
<v Riley Bowman>oh this thing kicks like this and so intuitively we want to go opposite to that

00:29:58.446 --> 00:30:04.346
<v Riley Bowman>we want to push back against it we want to push down or whatever it is because you know.

00:30:05.470 --> 00:30:08.650
<v Riley Bowman>We don't like the fact that it kicks. Nobody really does.

00:30:09.170 --> 00:30:12.330
<v Riley Bowman>Uh, and so, I mean, if I was just to push you suddenly, Jacob,

00:30:12.550 --> 00:30:15.290
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, you would, you'd be like, Oh, Hey dude, what was that about?

00:30:15.410 --> 00:30:17.970
<v Riley Bowman>And then if I made the move, like I was going to do it again,

00:30:18.190 --> 00:30:21.030
<v Riley Bowman>you would instantly change like something about your posture,

00:30:21.270 --> 00:30:26.390
<v Riley Bowman>your behavior would change to counteract what I was going to do. Right.

00:30:27.230 --> 00:30:31.610
<v Riley Bowman>And, and it's, that's kind of how recoil is. And so the problem with like,

00:30:31.610 --> 00:30:38.550
<v Riley Bowman>what that leads to is that people get way more involved in trying to control the gun.

00:30:38.970 --> 00:30:42.270
<v Riley Bowman>And we even hear the phrase recoil control.

00:30:42.730 --> 00:30:48.410
<v Riley Bowman>That's actually the more popularized term that's used in shooting is recoil control.

00:30:48.610 --> 00:30:52.070
<v Riley Bowman>And you'll note that over the years, especially the last five,

00:30:52.210 --> 00:30:54.430
<v Riley Bowman>six, seven years, I've been a lot more careful.

00:30:54.830 --> 00:31:00.850
<v Riley Bowman>I've moved away from recoil control. And I say recoil management because it's

00:31:00.850 --> 00:31:02.630
<v Riley Bowman>all just about managing that recoil.

00:31:02.890 --> 00:31:05.530
<v Riley Bowman>I am not trying to control it necessarily.

00:31:06.290 --> 00:31:11.010
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, you make this observation in the article that the gun itself.

00:31:12.170 --> 00:31:15.170
<v Riley Bowman>And of course you've seen me demonstrate this in class and talk about it in

00:31:15.170 --> 00:31:17.810
<v Riley Bowman>class, and it's in the Pistol IQ online video course.

00:31:19.070 --> 00:31:22.250
<v Riley Bowman>But one of the ways I demonstrate this is I'll take a pistol,

00:31:22.830 --> 00:31:26.850
<v Riley Bowman>an empty gun, lock the slide to the rear, I'll hold it in a slightly elevated,

00:31:26.850 --> 00:31:29.650
<v Riley Bowman>you know kind of like a simulated this is about where it would be if it recoiled

00:31:29.650 --> 00:31:33.350
<v Riley Bowman>in my hands during a shot and now let me just close the slide and i close the

00:31:33.350 --> 00:31:37.690
<v Riley Bowman>slide and what you see is that the energy from that slide when it comes forward

00:31:37.690 --> 00:31:41.870
<v Riley Bowman>and then it close and it completes that action you'll see it has this momentum

00:31:41.870 --> 00:31:46.070
<v Riley Bowman>to it and it carries the gun back forward and down,

00:31:46.730 --> 00:31:50.650
<v Riley Bowman>towards the direction it would have originated from during firing right and

00:31:50.650 --> 00:31:52.390
<v Riley Bowman>so i demonstrate that because.

00:31:53.507 --> 00:31:57.727
<v Riley Bowman>I want to make the point. I want people to see that the gun by itself,

00:31:57.767 --> 00:32:00.587
<v Riley Bowman>and we're talking about semi-automatics here, not revolvers.

00:32:00.727 --> 00:32:02.027
<v Riley Bowman>Revolvers are a different animal.

00:32:03.047 --> 00:32:06.367
<v Riley Bowman>Although some of the principles will be the same, there are some distinct differences

00:32:06.367 --> 00:32:10.567
<v Riley Bowman>for sure because a revolver doesn't have any part of the gun that's reciprocating, right?

00:32:10.687 --> 00:32:14.887
<v Riley Bowman>So all the recoil energy is going directly into your hands, into your body.

00:32:15.747 --> 00:32:20.747
<v Riley Bowman>But most people are shooting semi-automatics. Most people are carrying semi-automatics

00:32:20.747 --> 00:32:23.607
<v Riley Bowman>in today's world. So that's what we're mostly concerned about here today.

00:32:24.407 --> 00:32:30.127
<v Riley Bowman>So we want to just make the point that when the gun recoils and that slide starts

00:32:30.127 --> 00:32:34.007
<v Riley Bowman>moving to the rear, it's taking some of the energy and storing it in the recoil spring.

00:32:34.187 --> 00:32:37.967
<v Riley Bowman>And then it's releasing that energy when that recoil spring sends a slide back forward.

00:32:38.207 --> 00:32:43.227
<v Riley Bowman>And when that slide goes back forward, it's going to help bring the gun back forward and down.

00:32:43.607 --> 00:32:46.427
<v Riley Bowman>It's not going to do, it's not going to, you know, you have a hundred percent

00:32:46.427 --> 00:32:48.367
<v Riley Bowman>of whatever energy that comes back and up.

00:32:48.567 --> 00:32:52.507
<v Riley Bowman>It's not going to give quite a hundred percent back, but it's going to do 70%,

00:32:52.507 --> 00:32:54.327
<v Riley Bowman>80%. I don't know what it is.

00:32:54.547 --> 00:32:55.567
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's lost or absorbed.

00:32:55.687 --> 00:32:56.947
<v Riley Bowman>But when people see that, they

00:32:56.947 --> 00:33:02.587
<v Riley Bowman>go, oh, so the gun itself will do a lot of this work on its own for me.

00:33:02.727 --> 00:33:03.847
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yes. Yes. Yes.

00:33:04.287 --> 00:33:07.267
<v Riley Bowman>And so let's not try to complicate it any more than that.

00:33:07.587 --> 00:33:15.047
<v Riley Bowman>We want to only do just enough, whatever that is, to get the gun back on target.

00:33:15.047 --> 00:33:18.487
<v Riley Bowman>And preferably my preference is to not try

00:33:18.487 --> 00:33:21.367
<v Riley Bowman>to preemptively or let me back up

00:33:21.367 --> 00:33:24.227
<v Riley Bowman>i don't want to preempt that recoil meaning that

00:33:24.227 --> 00:33:29.367
<v Riley Bowman>as i'm firing the gun i start immediately pushing you know forward and down

00:33:29.367 --> 00:33:34.927
<v Riley Bowman>to counter the recoil no i just want to have enough pressure on the gun and

00:33:34.927 --> 00:33:40.347
<v Riley Bowman>have the structure built in how i'm gripping and how i'm standing that helps

00:33:40.347 --> 00:33:43.507
<v Riley Bowman>bring it back it helps give it that extra little bit of input.

00:33:43.947 --> 00:33:46.727
<v Riley Bowman>And that's, that's what we're talking about when we talk about passive recoil

00:33:46.727 --> 00:33:52.807
<v Riley Bowman>management is that we passively, you know, we allow the gun to do as much of the work as we can.

00:33:54.371 --> 00:33:57.131
<v Jacob Paulsen>I mean, there's two other factors that play into this that I left out of the

00:33:57.131 --> 00:33:58.811
<v Jacob Paulsen>article because I thought I might make them future articles.

00:33:58.951 --> 00:34:02.431
<v Jacob Paulsen>But I think to kind of continue this and like bring it full circle,

00:34:02.731 --> 00:34:06.531
<v Jacob Paulsen>I remember the moment I started to have this mental conflict.

00:34:06.531 --> 00:34:11.071
<v Jacob Paulsen>As I was working through this in my mind, this is many years ago now,

00:34:11.211 --> 00:34:14.191
<v Jacob Paulsen>and I was working through this concept. I'm like, wait a minute.

00:34:14.691 --> 00:34:17.791
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because if I just let it kick, as Rob Latham says,

00:34:17.911 --> 00:34:22.331
<v Jacob Paulsen>if I acknowledge that I can't reset the trigger faster than recoil happens anyway,

00:34:22.331 --> 00:34:26.211
<v Jacob Paulsen>so why am i working so hard to prevent recoil if

00:34:26.211 --> 00:34:29.511
<v Jacob Paulsen>i just let it take its natural motion then wait

00:34:29.511 --> 00:34:32.711
<v Jacob Paulsen>a minute like everything i've been taught about shooting

00:34:32.711 --> 00:34:35.611
<v Jacob Paulsen>was designed to help me stop the recoil

00:34:35.611 --> 00:34:38.771
<v Jacob Paulsen>from happening so is everything i've been taught wrong

00:34:38.771 --> 00:34:43.311
<v Jacob Paulsen>right like the way we grip the gun and now pinky pressure and like you know

00:34:43.311 --> 00:34:47.031
<v Jacob Paulsen>higher up on the phone you know near the fulcrum of rotation and you know stand

00:34:47.031 --> 00:34:50.791
<v Jacob Paulsen>like this and absorbing the energy and like all these things i was like man

00:34:50.791 --> 00:34:55.711
<v Jacob Paulsen>like all of my shooting instruction in my life seems like,

00:34:55.911 --> 00:34:58.091
<v Jacob Paulsen>and this is my own perspective,

00:34:58.591 --> 00:35:03.351
<v Jacob Paulsen>seems like it was trying to teach me how to prevent recoil from happening,

00:35:03.571 --> 00:35:09.091
<v Jacob Paulsen>how to mitigate the action of the muzzle lifting up in the air.

00:35:09.271 --> 00:35:14.271
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so if I'm going to accept this truth for myself, that I actually don't care

00:35:14.271 --> 00:35:18.151
<v Jacob Paulsen>if the muzzle lifts at all, that I'm just going to stop trying to stop that

00:35:18.151 --> 00:35:21.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>from happening, then wait a minute, like, then why, what, then everything I've

00:35:21.951 --> 00:35:23.631
<v Jacob Paulsen>been taught doesn't matter? That can't be true.

00:35:24.271 --> 00:35:27.451
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so that, I guess as I was working through that and trying to understand

00:35:27.451 --> 00:35:31.411
<v Jacob Paulsen>that, I can't remember what happened, but, but the revelation came, right?

00:35:31.471 --> 00:35:34.491
<v Jacob Paulsen>I probably, I was in a class or interviewing somebody or listening to an episode

00:35:34.491 --> 00:35:38.631
<v Jacob Paulsen>or I don't know what the thing was, but the, but the revelation came that was like, no, no, no,

00:35:39.896 --> 00:35:43.496
<v Jacob Paulsen>What we're missing here is that as farm instructors, we've done a massive disservice

00:35:43.496 --> 00:35:49.736
<v Jacob Paulsen>because we teach people all these things under the guise that recoil is bad

00:35:49.736 --> 00:35:52.276
<v Jacob Paulsen>and that we need to stop that recoil.

00:35:52.696 --> 00:35:58.156
<v Jacob Paulsen>That it is not good and it's your job to keep it from happening and the more

00:35:58.156 --> 00:36:00.096
<v Jacob Paulsen>you keep it from happening, the better you are.

00:36:00.336 --> 00:36:06.056
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that's really not true. And so the shift happened for me when I realized

00:36:06.056 --> 00:36:12.556
<v Jacob Paulsen>all those fundamentals are still important, the grip, the trigger, the aiming,

00:36:13.356 --> 00:36:16.116
<v Jacob Paulsen>the structure, stance, whatever people want to call it.

00:36:16.256 --> 00:36:23.676
<v Jacob Paulsen>All that still matters, but not because we're trying to mitigate the rise of the muzzle.

00:36:23.676 --> 00:36:31.036
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's because like all of that stuff is designed to create a consistent and and

00:36:31.036 --> 00:36:34.136
<v Jacob Paulsen>relatively speedy return to the same point of aim

00:36:34.136 --> 00:36:41.136
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah what i like to say is that you know if if your technique and your strength

00:36:41.136 --> 00:36:48.316
<v Riley Bowman>allows you to minimize the rise of the muzzle during recoil like more power

00:36:48.316 --> 00:36:51.356
<v Riley Bowman>to you like that's not a bad thing it certainly shortcuts.

00:36:51.356 --> 00:36:52.936
<v Jacob Paulsen>The the objective

00:36:52.936 --> 00:36:56.236
<v Riley Bowman>It certainly can be a bonus

00:36:56.236 --> 00:36:58.916
<v Riley Bowman>in shooting however it's not the end all

00:36:58.916 --> 00:37:02.036
<v Riley Bowman>be all and so for a long time that was it was

00:37:02.036 --> 00:37:04.916
<v Riley Bowman>the end all be all for me like i was just convinced i'm like i'm just gonna

00:37:04.916 --> 00:37:08.496
<v Riley Bowman>be a better shooter if i can just manage to get this gun to be flatter and flatter

00:37:08.496 --> 00:37:14.576
<v Riley Bowman>and flatter uh but to your point what i ultimately had to come around to to

00:37:14.576 --> 00:37:21.296
<v Riley Bowman>understand and to see was that it's far more important that the gun,

00:37:22.236 --> 00:37:29.596
<v Riley Bowman>consistently lifts, you know, after a shot's fired, lifts and then returns back to that target,

00:37:31.106 --> 00:37:35.886
<v Riley Bowman>As you said, it's got to be in a relatively speedy fashion, but really, I mean.

00:37:36.006 --> 00:37:41.326
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's predictability, it's consistency, and efficiency of movement.

00:37:41.346 --> 00:37:45.426
<v Jacob Paulsen>In other words, a straight pattern, that's really what matters.

00:37:45.606 --> 00:37:49.466
<v Riley Bowman>Here's the thing. The gun cycles we just established in like .06, right? Yep.

00:37:50.286 --> 00:37:54.846
<v Riley Bowman>If it goes straight up and straight back down, that's very efficient. Gold.

00:37:55.246 --> 00:37:59.026
<v Riley Bowman>It's up, it's down. Like that's about as efficient as it can be is back,

00:37:59.206 --> 00:38:02.206
<v Riley Bowman>back and up and forward and down. Boom, boom. Okay.

00:38:02.866 --> 00:38:08.746
<v Riley Bowman>If it does that. All right. And if it does that in 0.06, 0.08.

00:38:09.346 --> 00:38:15.686
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. Then the degree or the amount that it lifts, it's, it's going to be plenty speedy enough.

00:38:15.786 --> 00:38:19.406
<v Jacob Paulsen>It doesn't matter. Yeah. It could be, it could be doubles. It could be twice

00:38:19.406 --> 00:38:22.286
<v Jacob Paulsen>as slow. It could be 0.06 times two. It could be 0.12.

00:38:23.246 --> 00:38:28.006
<v Jacob Paulsen>And it still wouldn't impact how quickly I could shoot. to, at least in theory,

00:38:28.246 --> 00:38:30.826
<v Jacob Paulsen>I guess it depends on how good my vision is, or how fast my,

00:38:30.906 --> 00:38:32.026
<v Jacob Paulsen>if I'm Jerry Michalik style.

00:38:32.446 --> 00:38:39.586
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the key is this consistent, predictable, and most efficient path of recoil.

00:38:39.686 --> 00:38:43.906
<v Jacob Paulsen>So the things I'm doing about gripping my gun, where I previously thought I

00:38:43.906 --> 00:38:46.346
<v Jacob Paulsen>was trying to make the gun shoot flatter and not let the muzzle come up,

00:38:46.626 --> 00:38:49.646
<v Jacob Paulsen>now the current understanding is, no, no, no, no, no.

00:38:49.966 --> 00:38:51.726
<v Jacob Paulsen>The things I'm, like, the inputs

00:38:51.726 --> 00:38:56.366
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm applying to this gun are about this consistent path of movement. Yes.

00:38:56.846 --> 00:39:01.026
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then my stance and my structure, my arms and elbows and shoulders,

00:39:01.366 --> 00:39:04.606
<v Jacob Paulsen>all that is about return to the same point. Yep.

00:39:05.633 --> 00:39:10.793
<v Riley Bowman>Exactly. Because if you were to analyze, you know, if you had like perfect awareness

00:39:10.793 --> 00:39:15.053
<v Riley Bowman>of the movement of your gun from shot to shot, let's say, okay,

00:39:15.173 --> 00:39:19.133
<v Riley Bowman>what you'll see from a lot of shooters is they get the gun lined up on target.

00:39:19.293 --> 00:39:21.973
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. Sights look good. Target looks good. Okay. Send the shot. Bang.

00:39:22.493 --> 00:39:28.333
<v Riley Bowman>Shot fires. Gun recoils. Almost always it's going to, that initial lift is going to be straight up.

00:39:28.673 --> 00:39:31.413
<v Riley Bowman>Okay. Now we could put some different torques and things into it.

00:39:31.473 --> 00:39:34.153
<v Riley Bowman>It might be a little bit different than that, but it's almost always going to be pretty straight up.

00:39:34.673 --> 00:39:38.013
<v Riley Bowman>But what happens after that is really what's key because then

00:39:38.013 --> 00:39:40.813
<v Riley Bowman>what we see is that then the shooter starts putting inputs into the gun

00:39:40.813 --> 00:39:43.533
<v Riley Bowman>and and it you know so let's let me give you

00:39:43.533 --> 00:39:46.753
<v Riley Bowman>a couple different scenarios that i think are pretty common one is

00:39:46.753 --> 00:39:50.853
<v Riley Bowman>the gun starts recovering back to the target but because they are over what

00:39:50.853 --> 00:39:54.513
<v Riley Bowman>i like to call over driving the gun meaning they're putting way more input into

00:39:54.513 --> 00:39:58.613
<v Riley Bowman>it than they need to just in terms of that trying to control that up and back

00:39:58.613 --> 00:40:03.253
<v Riley Bowman>motion they end up pushing the gun and the sights like there's this there's

00:40:03.253 --> 00:40:05.653
<v Riley Bowman>a target they're they're They're waiting for the sights to come back.

00:40:05.773 --> 00:40:09.973
<v Riley Bowman>But what happens is the sight comes back and goes through the target and down.

00:40:10.553 --> 00:40:13.673
<v Riley Bowman>And then they have to wait for that. Then they have to make another correction

00:40:13.673 --> 00:40:17.913
<v Riley Bowman>of, well, it went over the target, went beyond, and now I have to bring it back.

00:40:18.193 --> 00:40:23.393
<v Riley Bowman>And that leads to almost like this oscillation of like, where's the sight? Oh, there it is.

00:40:23.893 --> 00:40:28.273
<v Riley Bowman>Another thing is that they put a lot of inputs into the gun that creates little

00:40:28.273 --> 00:40:30.753
<v Riley Bowman>curly cues and little swirls and different things.

00:40:30.853 --> 00:40:34.213
<v Riley Bowman>And so gun recoils up and then comes back. and when it comes back to the target

00:40:34.213 --> 00:40:36.573
<v Riley Bowman>then it's starting to kind of sway around a little bit.

00:40:36.673 --> 00:40:39.893
<v Jacob Paulsen>That's a failure of the fundamentals. Right. Like you have a technique problem

00:40:39.893 --> 00:40:41.013
<v Jacob Paulsen>if that's happening to you.

00:40:41.293 --> 00:40:41.473
<v Riley Bowman>Yep.

00:40:41.773 --> 00:40:41.933
<v Jacob Paulsen>But

00:40:42.642 --> 00:40:48.382
<v Jacob Paulsen>sometimes we are our own worst enemies like our attempt to put more muscle mass

00:40:48.382 --> 00:40:55.762
<v Jacob Paulsen>more energy more strength to prevent muzzle lift is what causes it to you know

00:40:55.762 --> 00:41:00.522
<v Jacob Paulsen>go in weird angles or correct right yes so

00:41:00.522 --> 00:41:04.042
<v Riley Bowman>Then what does that lead to that's where the time suck.

00:41:04.042 --> 00:41:05.522
<v Jacob Paulsen>Comes big time because

00:41:05.522 --> 00:41:09.222
<v Riley Bowman>Now you're like well my sight was there when i you know i fired that last shot

00:41:09.222 --> 00:41:10.742
<v Riley Bowman>but now it comes back and where is it.

00:41:10.742 --> 00:41:13.802
<v Jacob Paulsen>Oh there it is yeah yeah the speed at which you can like

00:41:13.802 --> 00:41:16.502
<v Jacob Paulsen>i do a drill i do an exercise um it's the

00:41:16.502 --> 00:41:19.602
<v Jacob Paulsen>last thing i do in my standard basic handgun classes

00:41:19.602 --> 00:41:24.222
<v Jacob Paulsen>you know if you go take my eight hour you know get your permit in colorado class

00:41:24.222 --> 00:41:28.762
<v Jacob Paulsen>the last thing i'll have you do and and for some context throughout the entire

00:41:28.762 --> 00:41:31.702
<v Jacob Paulsen>class and we're on the range for four hours in that class eight for four hours

00:41:31.702 --> 00:41:34.682
<v Jacob Paulsen>classroom four hours on the range so you're on the range for me with four hours

00:41:34.682 --> 00:41:38.682
<v Jacob Paulsen>and during those four hours nothing is time nothing is even under pressure I always say,

00:41:38.822 --> 00:41:41.142
<v Jacob Paulsen>take your time, shoot at your own pace, and we do whatever the exercise is.

00:41:41.282 --> 00:41:45.082
<v Jacob Paulsen>But the last exercise, the instructions are as follows.

00:41:46.442 --> 00:41:50.942
<v Jacob Paulsen>We're, you know, use the same target zone. We're, for the first time and only

00:41:50.942 --> 00:41:53.302
<v Jacob Paulsen>time today at the class, I'm going to encourage you to go as fast as you can.

00:41:53.422 --> 00:41:56.882
<v Jacob Paulsen>However, you may not fire a shot until you've acquired sights and confirmed

00:41:56.882 --> 00:41:59.042
<v Jacob Paulsen>the sight picture, and then you can send the shot.

00:41:59.142 --> 00:42:02.542
<v Jacob Paulsen>But do that as fast as you can. I want you to fire five shots as fast as you

00:42:02.542 --> 00:42:06.262
<v Jacob Paulsen>can, but every shot has to be perfectly aimed.

00:42:07.142 --> 00:42:11.902
<v Jacob Paulsen>And, you know, go kind of thing. And this is where we find out how consistent

00:42:11.902 --> 00:42:13.862
<v Jacob Paulsen>your control of the recoil is.

00:42:14.302 --> 00:42:18.002
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because, you know, when you go bang and that gun comes back and you have to

00:42:18.002 --> 00:42:22.102
<v Jacob Paulsen>search for your sight, reacquire, realign, and then go bang again,

00:42:23.442 --> 00:42:29.042
<v Jacob Paulsen>that tells us that your fundamentals are not executing in a way that provides

00:42:29.042 --> 00:42:30.562
<v Jacob Paulsen>you the end objective and goal.

00:42:30.802 --> 00:42:34.082
<v Jacob Paulsen>It has nothing to do with how much lift there is. It has nothing to do...

00:42:35.260 --> 00:42:38.920
<v Jacob Paulsen>To a great degree with how much strength you input into the gun.

00:42:39.360 --> 00:42:45.280
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Yeah. So that's why that recoil reprogramming exercise is, I think, so key.

00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:48.680
<v Riley Bowman>I think it's helpful for most students is to help them understand,

00:42:48.680 --> 00:42:53.980
<v Riley Bowman>like, we want to minimize our inputs into the gun because by minimizing inputs,

00:42:54.280 --> 00:42:59.720
<v Riley Bowman>then we actually help minimize the variables that can steer us off course.

00:42:59.860 --> 00:43:02.940
<v Riley Bowman>Because if we can get the gun to behave just as

00:43:02.940 --> 00:43:05.840
<v Riley Bowman>a gun as much as it can on its own and then

00:43:05.840 --> 00:43:09.180
<v Riley Bowman>we just give the minimal whatever extra required

00:43:09.180 --> 00:43:12.120
<v Riley Bowman>then there's less likelihood that we introduce

00:43:12.120 --> 00:43:16.540
<v Riley Bowman>these other things that are going to you know overdrive or or you know take

00:43:16.540 --> 00:43:21.220
<v Riley Bowman>us to the left or to the right or in a swirl or whatever uh because ultimately

00:43:21.220 --> 00:43:24.380
<v Riley Bowman>we just want straight up straight back down straight up straight back down and

00:43:24.380 --> 00:43:30.200
<v Riley Bowman>right back to the starting point not beyond it not below it and that's that's that's the key how.

00:43:30.200 --> 00:43:32.720
<v Jacob Paulsen>Are we doing on time because i gotta decide if i'm I'm going to inject another

00:43:32.720 --> 00:43:35.580
<v Jacob Paulsen>thought here. No. Yeah, no, we have time. So I'm going to inject another thought.

00:43:35.720 --> 00:43:36.220
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, let's do it.

00:43:36.420 --> 00:43:40.640
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this is not in the article, but part of the very beginning of this journey

00:43:40.640 --> 00:43:45.600
<v Jacob Paulsen>for me, and again, this is me writing an article today about a breakthrough

00:43:45.600 --> 00:43:47.280
<v Jacob Paulsen>that I really had like four or five years ago.

00:43:47.900 --> 00:43:51.240
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm trying to provide that context. It's not about my ego.

00:43:51.360 --> 00:43:53.920
<v Jacob Paulsen>If I just had this breakthrough last week, that'd be fine by me.

00:43:55.140 --> 00:43:58.640
<v Jacob Paulsen>And to be clear, I don't think I invented this concept. And I try and say as much as the article,

00:43:58.720 --> 00:44:01.480
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think anybody who shoots enough and over time is going

00:44:01.480 --> 00:44:04.940
<v Jacob Paulsen>to figure this out yeah yeah for sure and anybody who's shooting at a decently

00:44:04.940 --> 00:44:09.480
<v Jacob Paulsen>high level performance has figured this out yep but part of part of this for

00:44:09.480 --> 00:44:14.420
<v Jacob Paulsen>me had everything to do with anticipation so uh i'll give you another example

00:44:14.420 --> 00:44:19.340
<v Jacob Paulsen>i'm at i'm in a class rule this might be 2019 or 2020.

00:44:20.695 --> 00:44:25.835
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we're basically doing build drills. And at that time,

00:44:26.155 --> 00:44:31.875
<v Jacob Paulsen>I believed falsely that doing

00:44:31.875 --> 00:44:36.895
<v Jacob Paulsen>a good build drill came down to getting one good sight picture and then gripping

00:44:36.895 --> 00:44:42.775
<v Jacob Paulsen>the snot out of that gun so hard and so tight and so strong and with limiting

00:44:42.775 --> 00:44:46.735
<v Jacob Paulsen>recoil so much that you just sent the next five and they would just go in the

00:44:46.735 --> 00:44:48.915
<v Jacob Paulsen>same place. That's what I believed.

00:44:48.915 --> 00:44:50.675
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah, you'd see your sight once.

00:44:50.855 --> 00:44:52.535
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, and then just let it rip six times.

00:44:52.715 --> 00:44:57.795
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. Like, so in other words, you're not seeing the dot or sights for shots two through six.

00:44:57.935 --> 00:45:00.975
<v Jacob Paulsen>Correct. That's what I thought was done. Sure, sure, sure, sure.

00:45:00.995 --> 00:45:02.795
<v Jacob Paulsen>I thought that's what good shooters did.

00:45:03.315 --> 00:45:03.495
<v Riley Bowman>Nope.

00:45:05.295 --> 00:45:08.395
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm not embarrassed. Like, that's just what I thought that was happening.

00:45:08.795 --> 00:45:14.075
<v Jacob Paulsen>I didn't think at the time it was possible to see your sights at that rate of

00:45:14.075 --> 00:45:16.115
<v Jacob Paulsen>speed that I saw shooters shooting.

00:45:16.375 --> 00:45:22.315
<v Jacob Paulsen>Right? When someone's cooking off a bill drill with splits that are 0.15 and

00:45:22.315 --> 00:45:29.095
<v Jacob Paulsen>a 0.75 draw, they're cooking something out in the two-second range or under two-second range,

00:45:29.615 --> 00:45:33.955
<v Jacob Paulsen>it was hard for me at that time to look at that and think, you're seeing your

00:45:33.955 --> 00:45:36.195
<v Jacob Paulsen>sights every time? I don't buy it.

00:45:37.275 --> 00:45:41.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>Because I didn't think that was true, I assumed that the only mechanism to do

00:45:41.455 --> 00:45:44.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>this with any sort of efficiency and speed was see it once,

00:45:44.995 --> 00:45:48.735
<v Jacob Paulsen>lock it in let it rip and um

00:45:48.735 --> 00:45:51.575
<v Jacob Paulsen>i remember being basically embarrassed in the

00:45:51.575 --> 00:45:55.375
<v Jacob Paulsen>class because that's what i did and my

00:45:55.375 --> 00:45:58.915
<v Jacob Paulsen>sights were all over the tar or my my holes were all over the target i was like

00:45:58.915 --> 00:46:03.355
<v Jacob Paulsen>that was terrible um but it was like a break in my brain i was like wait a minute

00:46:03.355 --> 00:46:08.955
<v Jacob Paulsen>but like the two things cannot both be true right like so so i just assumed

00:46:08.955 --> 00:46:11.635
<v Jacob Paulsen>like well i gotta get stronger i guess and grip the gun harder i'm never gonna

00:46:11.635 --> 00:46:14.875
<v Jacob Paulsen>be able to get a two three even maybe sub four second Yeah,

00:46:15.275 --> 00:46:17.615
<v Jacob Paulsen>I didn't get right in that four second without doing too much special.

00:46:17.775 --> 00:46:20.455
<v Jacob Paulsen>But anyway, I just thought, you know, I guess I'm just going to be able to do

00:46:20.455 --> 00:46:22.315
<v Jacob Paulsen>it unless I go get tougher and stronger. Yeah.

00:46:23.053 --> 00:46:26.393
<v Jacob Paulsen>But then here's another breakthrough. This is all going to come together.

00:46:26.853 --> 00:46:29.033
<v Jacob Paulsen>We were doing the hex drill.

00:46:29.913 --> 00:46:31.673
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's been a while since you probably shot a hex drill.

00:46:31.853 --> 00:46:32.413
<v Riley Bowman>It has been a while.

00:46:32.973 --> 00:46:36.013
<v Jacob Paulsen>And this is the one time, and this is why I remember it so well,

00:46:37.073 --> 00:46:42.173
<v Jacob Paulsen>that you and I both performed the same thing at the same time in a class, and I beat you.

00:46:43.613 --> 00:46:48.113
<v Jacob Paulsen>We were two in an instructor development class up here in Colorado.

00:46:48.293 --> 00:46:49.333
<v Jacob Paulsen>We had three or four students in it.

00:46:49.753 --> 00:46:52.913
<v Jacob Paulsen>And we were doing a stationary hex drill. I don't remember. We had a name for that.

00:46:53.053 --> 00:46:55.973
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like basic hex drill or something but it's basically a stationary hex drill

00:46:55.973 --> 00:46:58.733
<v Jacob Paulsen>you just remove the movement but it's a it's a

00:46:58.733 --> 00:47:01.633
<v Jacob Paulsen>lot of cadence of fire in this drill where you you know

00:47:01.633 --> 00:47:05.113
<v Jacob Paulsen>you're you getting a two inch uh diameter circle

00:47:05.113 --> 00:47:07.793
<v Jacob Paulsen>you have to fire on that circle and then you come back and you put in

00:47:07.793 --> 00:47:10.553
<v Jacob Paulsen>body shots and so you know obviously you're going much faster in the body

00:47:10.553 --> 00:47:14.193
<v Jacob Paulsen>shots and you gotta slow down and you have to be a lot more precise in order

00:47:14.193 --> 00:47:18.593
<v Jacob Paulsen>to hit these these smaller targets and so you asked me to demo it so i step

00:47:18.593 --> 00:47:24.993
<v Jacob Paulsen>up to the line and i decided that the only way i was going to get these precise

00:47:24.993 --> 00:47:29.053
<v Jacob Paulsen>shots in an efficient time was if I just told myself to let it recoil.

00:47:29.633 --> 00:47:34.133
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was like, because anything I do to fight the recoil will almost certainly

00:47:34.133 --> 00:47:35.533
<v Jacob Paulsen>cause me to miss the target.

00:47:36.539 --> 00:47:40.039
<v Jacob Paulsen>Which is an anticipation issue, right? And I just knew this of myself.

00:47:40.199 --> 00:47:44.379
<v Jacob Paulsen>This is Jacob trying to loophole his own deficiency.

00:47:45.039 --> 00:47:50.779
<v Jacob Paulsen>I was trying to cheat, right? I'm like, I was acknowledging that I know I anticipate.

00:47:51.179 --> 00:47:55.819
<v Jacob Paulsen>And because I anticipate, I miss. And that doesn't matter in these body shots.

00:47:55.939 --> 00:47:56.819
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'll just anticipate.

00:47:57.079 --> 00:48:01.019
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'll just drive it faster. And I know I'll anticipate when I shoot that fast, but whatever.

00:48:01.939 --> 00:48:05.619
<v Jacob Paulsen>But in these little two-inch circles, if I'm going to do this with any speed

00:48:05.619 --> 00:48:12.879
<v Jacob Paulsen>or efficiency, I can't anticipate like I have to be, it requires a greater degree of precision to do it.

00:48:13.659 --> 00:48:16.539
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I, in my head in that moment, I was like, well, what I'm going to try to

00:48:16.539 --> 00:48:19.439
<v Jacob Paulsen>do is just let it recoil. Like in my brain, I'm just going to think,

00:48:19.519 --> 00:48:21.459
<v Jacob Paulsen>let it go. Just let it, just let it, let it kick, whatever.

00:48:21.699 --> 00:48:24.059
<v Jacob Paulsen>And then when I go back to the body shots, you know, I'll just,

00:48:24.459 --> 00:48:27.919
<v Jacob Paulsen>then, then I'll, then I'll worry about recoil. Cause you know, I got to move faster.

00:48:28.279 --> 00:48:31.199
<v Jacob Paulsen>So this was not a very accurate perception of how to do this.

00:48:31.399 --> 00:48:35.139
<v Jacob Paulsen>So I'm not recommending anybody think about this, this at all the way I thought

00:48:35.139 --> 00:48:42.199
<v Jacob Paulsen>about it at the time. however it led to success in in these precise shots and

00:48:42.199 --> 00:48:44.799
<v Jacob Paulsen>it was a moment it was a breakthrough for me where i'm like wait a minute like

00:48:46.343 --> 00:48:52.423
<v Jacob Paulsen>that worked, right? Like I nailed every one of those flawlessly. Like I crushed it,

00:48:52.723 --> 00:48:53.343
<v Riley Bowman>Right?

00:48:53.583 --> 00:48:56.943
<v Jacob Paulsen>And like that, that stuck in my brain, right?

00:48:57.023 --> 00:49:02.143
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like in this way, it's like, wait a minute, like I can hit these precise shots when I need to.

00:49:02.903 --> 00:49:07.223
<v Jacob Paulsen>I do a demo now. I do a sight forgiveness drill in every one of my classes and

00:49:07.223 --> 00:49:08.363
<v Jacob Paulsen>I do it on a one inch square.

00:49:08.723 --> 00:49:12.183
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I always hit the one inch square, always. And I usually do it from either

00:49:12.183 --> 00:49:14.323
<v Jacob Paulsen>five or seven yards, depending on the class and the way set up.

00:49:14.943 --> 00:49:21.143
<v Jacob Paulsen>But that's something I would have been incapable of doing with any consistency back in 2019, 2018.

00:49:21.543 --> 00:49:26.103
<v Jacob Paulsen>But today, I don't hesitate to think cold without having fired a shot yet today,

00:49:26.203 --> 00:49:32.003
<v Jacob Paulsen>I can draw my gun and given two seconds, I can hit a one-inch square five or seven yards.

00:49:32.363 --> 00:49:35.323
<v Jacob Paulsen>And that comes down to what? These principles at play.

00:49:35.483 --> 00:49:43.243
<v Jacob Paulsen>Like me saying, the way I solved my anticipation issue was by deciding that

00:49:43.243 --> 00:49:46.323
<v Jacob Paulsen>recoil was perfectly acceptable. And it's fine.

00:49:47.023 --> 00:49:52.523
<v Jacob Paulsen>It's okay. And just the acceptance of recoil as an acceptable thing that I do

00:49:52.523 --> 00:49:56.043
<v Jacob Paulsen>not have to fight or stop or mitigate at all,

00:49:56.903 --> 00:50:01.463
<v Jacob Paulsen>in the brain, if that truly lives in there deeply, then the brain says,

00:50:01.583 --> 00:50:03.023
<v Jacob Paulsen>okay, then why are we fighting it?

00:50:03.903 --> 00:50:07.943
<v Jacob Paulsen>We're not. Okay, we're not going to fight it? Okay, then you're not going to

00:50:07.943 --> 00:50:08.803
<v Jacob Paulsen>anticipate the shot at all.

00:50:10.451 --> 00:50:14.691
<v Riley Bowman>Well, that's, and that's, you hear me say that in, uh, when we do the recoil

00:50:14.691 --> 00:50:18.851
<v Riley Bowman>reprogramming exercises in my classes, uh, I say basically, you know,

00:50:18.991 --> 00:50:22.231
<v Riley Bowman>if you do this first part of that exercise correctly,

00:50:22.691 --> 00:50:27.451
<v Riley Bowman>which is all about teaching the student to allow the gun to just kick,

00:50:28.071 --> 00:50:30.231
<v Riley Bowman>then you cannot anticipate.

00:50:30.511 --> 00:50:30.951
<v Jacob Paulsen>No.

00:50:31.271 --> 00:50:38.171
<v Riley Bowman>Right. Because, I mean, it just, it's the antithesis of that, right? Yeah.

00:50:39.131 --> 00:50:44.131
<v Riley Bowman>That, you know, I let it kick. Therefore, I am not doing anything to try to preempt it.

00:50:44.311 --> 00:50:48.991
<v Riley Bowman>So I cannot possibly anticipate it. And so many people have struggles with anticipation.

00:50:49.411 --> 00:50:51.171
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. You have. I have.

00:50:51.611 --> 00:50:54.551
<v Jacob Paulsen>I think every shooter. Like 90 plus, 98%. Every male shooter.

00:50:54.831 --> 00:50:57.791
<v Jacob Paulsen>I've met some women that seem to have, like, just their pickup guns for the

00:50:57.791 --> 00:51:00.411
<v Jacob Paulsen>first time and they just don't anticipate. But us dudes, like,

00:51:00.491 --> 00:51:01.791
<v Jacob Paulsen>we all just are going to anticipate it sometime.

00:51:02.631 --> 00:51:09.011
<v Riley Bowman>So it's so freeing. And it's how it was for me to kind of get over that hump.

00:51:09.011 --> 00:51:12.351
<v Riley Bowman>And like you just described your own experience with, of being like,

00:51:12.451 --> 00:51:15.131
<v Riley Bowman>you know what, uh, the gun's going to kick no matter what.

00:51:15.611 --> 00:51:19.251
<v Riley Bowman>And yes, I can do certain things that minimizes that, but if I just accept it,

00:51:19.251 --> 00:51:25.771
<v Riley Bowman>uh, and then just focus, put all my effort into getting the gun to just be as

00:51:25.771 --> 00:51:27.911
<v Riley Bowman>consistent as possible from shot to shot.

00:51:28.071 --> 00:51:31.471
<v Riley Bowman>Cause that, that was the big thing for me was just realizing that,

00:51:31.951 --> 00:51:37.851
<v Riley Bowman>Hey, it doesn't matter how much it lifts in recoil but if it comes right back

00:51:37.851 --> 00:51:43.491
<v Riley Bowman>to where i'm trying to hit yes the target yep on that next shot bingo then and

00:51:43.491 --> 00:51:47.291
<v Riley Bowman>my finger's ready meaning that i have reset the trigger during that time then

00:51:47.291 --> 00:51:50.571
<v Riley Bowman>it's like bam ready to go again yep you know in.

00:51:50.571 --> 00:51:56.191
<v Jacob Paulsen>The article there's a gif is that what we call it gif gif i don't know a gif

00:51:56.191 --> 00:52:03.931
<v Jacob Paulsen>file type image um and this is of me running a uspsa style stage at the ASP

00:52:03.931 --> 00:52:05.231
<v Jacob Paulsen>conference and I think 2023.

00:52:06.931 --> 00:52:07.531
<v Riley Bowman>Sounds about right.

00:52:07.791 --> 00:52:11.611
<v Jacob Paulsen>And when I was writing this article, I was trying to find an image,

00:52:11.871 --> 00:52:14.151
<v Jacob Paulsen>a video that I could use to kind of illustrate this.

00:52:14.391 --> 00:52:19.511
<v Jacob Paulsen>And I really like this particular GIF because you can see my muzzle very clearly.

00:52:19.791 --> 00:52:24.731
<v Jacob Paulsen>And you can see it has rise, like undeniable rise, like whoop,

00:52:24.851 --> 00:52:25.831
<v Riley Bowman>Whoop, like up, up.

00:52:25.891 --> 00:52:29.651
<v Jacob Paulsen>Up, up kind of thing. But it also is highly consistent.

00:52:29.791 --> 00:52:33.971
<v Jacob Paulsen>I'm putting two shots in each target. There's an array of three targets that you see in this GIF.

00:52:33.971 --> 00:52:40.271
<v Jacob Paulsen>And so it's sort of like you know bang bang shift you know transition bang bang transition bang bang

00:52:40.711 --> 00:52:43.471
<v Jacob Paulsen>and in hindsight i probably should have been the opposite order but it doesn't

00:52:43.471 --> 00:52:46.291
<v Jacob Paulsen>matter for the purpose of this article perfectly yeah the purpose

00:52:46.291 --> 00:52:49.211
<v Jacob Paulsen>of this article you you're seeing exactly what

00:52:49.211 --> 00:52:52.211
<v Jacob Paulsen>i'm talking about in this in this little animated video like

00:52:52.211 --> 00:52:56.151
<v Jacob Paulsen>you see that it is absolutely recoiling because i am not trying to spite it

00:52:56.151 --> 00:53:00.311
<v Jacob Paulsen>at all like i am perfectly accepting of the recoil like it's cool man this is

00:53:00.311 --> 00:53:04.131
<v Jacob Paulsen>a glock 19 in this video and i'm just like do it man like do your thing like

00:53:04.131 --> 00:53:09.891
<v Jacob Paulsen>i love you and just recoil all you want to i am sorry i've been fighting you on this all these years

00:53:10.551 --> 00:53:15.331
<v Jacob Paulsen>have a good time yeah and then come back to me and and you know boom it just

00:53:15.331 --> 00:53:19.831
<v Jacob Paulsen>comes back for me right away right to where i left off so i'm not saying i don't

00:53:19.831 --> 00:53:22.991
<v Jacob Paulsen>have to i have so many other shooting deficiencies for sure nor am i saying

00:53:22.991 --> 00:53:26.211
<v Jacob Paulsen>that i got this completely 100 locked down and I never have a problem with it

00:53:26.211 --> 00:53:27.051
<v Jacob Paulsen>because that's not true either.

00:53:28.431 --> 00:53:29.991
<v Jacob Paulsen>But yeah, major breakthrough. Yeah.

00:53:31.147 --> 00:53:34.787
<v Riley Bowman>So if we were to sum this all up, I mean, there's a number of things we could

00:53:34.787 --> 00:53:41.867
<v Riley Bowman>probably say, but just from where you ended there and using this GIF image as an example,

00:53:43.487 --> 00:53:47.407
<v Riley Bowman>instead of putting emphasis, you guys, you shooters, all of us,

00:53:48.287 --> 00:53:54.807
<v Riley Bowman>on how much the gun moves or lifts during recoil, change our focus,

00:53:54.987 --> 00:54:00.887
<v Riley Bowman>our emphasis to where the gun stops when it comes back post-recoil.

00:54:01.507 --> 00:54:05.907
<v Riley Bowman>That's really like the thing that sets you up to be able to shoot better and

00:54:05.907 --> 00:54:11.127
<v Riley Bowman>faster because if the gun comes right back to where you want it where you need

00:54:11.127 --> 00:54:13.027
<v Riley Bowman>it where you're looking where you're aiming,

00:54:14.394 --> 00:54:18.134
<v Riley Bowman>Or shots two, shots three, four, five, six.

00:54:19.254 --> 00:54:22.754
<v Riley Bowman>And you're doing everything else correctly. Like you should see that moment

00:54:22.754 --> 00:54:25.834
<v Riley Bowman>that it happens, meaning that now your dot or your sight's right back where

00:54:25.834 --> 00:54:26.694
<v Riley Bowman>you're expecting it to be.

00:54:28.314 --> 00:54:33.254
<v Riley Bowman>And at that point, like there's nothing else that you need to do other than reset the trigger.

00:54:33.494 --> 00:54:34.234
<v Jacob Paulsen>Everything else is irrelevant.

00:54:34.354 --> 00:54:37.934
<v Riley Bowman>Right? Yeah, yeah. You know, and so like you can shoot as fast as you,

00:54:38.074 --> 00:54:43.894
<v Riley Bowman>as fast as you can get that sight to come right back to where you're looking.

00:54:44.834 --> 00:54:47.314
<v Riley Bowman>Is your limiting factor to how fast you can shoot.

00:54:47.374 --> 00:54:50.894
<v Jacob Paulsen>What does John say? John Cree, I think, says the sights are the gas pedal or something like that?

00:54:51.274 --> 00:54:55.834
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. It's about gas pedals. Its grip is the master.

00:54:56.174 --> 00:54:59.814
<v Riley Bowman>Sights are the, hold on. The speedometer.

00:55:00.114 --> 00:55:01.034
<v Jacob Paulsen>Something like this.

00:55:01.254 --> 00:55:02.994
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. It's a good saying. I like it.

00:55:03.134 --> 00:55:06.714
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah. We'd sound really intelligent if we could remember it.

00:55:06.834 --> 00:55:12.034
<v Jacob Paulsen>But that's, yes, like that's, like it's not about how much muzzle lift you have.

00:55:12.034 --> 00:55:15.134
<v Jacob Paulsen>It really doesn't matter maybe it

00:55:15.134 --> 00:55:19.514
<v Jacob Paulsen>doesn't make you look as cool on Instagram but I'm okay with that like I have

00:55:19.514 --> 00:55:24.814
<v Jacob Paulsen>no issue with it at all what is relevant is the speed at which I can reacquire

00:55:24.814 --> 00:55:32.794
<v Jacob Paulsen>sight picture and that's not probably going to be influenced by how limited my muzzle lift is yeah

00:55:34.856 --> 00:55:38.276
<v Riley Bowman>That's excellent. Uh, I'm just looking through a couple of other notes I had

00:55:38.276 --> 00:55:41.616
<v Riley Bowman>here and I mean, we're kind of at the, at time here, but, uh,

00:55:42.196 --> 00:55:44.536
<v Riley Bowman>I think, I think we hit it pretty good there.

00:55:44.956 --> 00:55:48.196
<v Riley Bowman>I appreciate you sharing your perspective on this. Uh, I think,

00:55:48.496 --> 00:55:51.576
<v Riley Bowman>I mean, this was helpful for me to realize these, you know, you and I have been

00:55:51.576 --> 00:55:55.196
<v Riley Bowman>at some different points of our journeys, but yeah, you know,

00:55:55.396 --> 00:55:59.916
<v Riley Bowman>you're sharing a lot of same aha moments that I had just at different,

00:56:00.436 --> 00:56:02.516
<v Riley Bowman>timeframes. Sure. You know, in our own journeys.

00:56:03.136 --> 00:56:07.876
<v Riley Bowman>And it feels really good to hear you, you know, share some of your takeaways.

00:56:08.656 --> 00:56:11.776
<v Riley Bowman>As you mentioned, you started to understand some of these things a while ago,

00:56:11.876 --> 00:56:17.656
<v Riley Bowman>but what was the big thing recently was that language of active recoil management

00:56:17.656 --> 00:56:19.096
<v Riley Bowman>versus passive recoil management.

00:56:19.116 --> 00:56:23.676
<v Jacob Paulsen>Yeah, that gave me a vernacular I felt I could use to describe this thing that

00:56:23.676 --> 00:56:26.196
<v Jacob Paulsen>I didn't know otherwise how to describe well.

00:56:26.476 --> 00:56:31.296
<v Riley Bowman>Yeah. And I think to kind of sum that up here uh since passive recoil management's

00:56:31.296 --> 00:56:35.856
<v Riley Bowman>in the title of the podcast episode even is that active recoil management is

00:56:35.856 --> 00:56:39.056
<v Riley Bowman>what the person who's trying to control the recoil is doing.

00:56:39.056 --> 00:56:40.636
<v Jacob Paulsen>Mitigate lift yeah

00:56:40.636 --> 00:56:45.656
<v Riley Bowman>Whereas passive recoil management is you let the gun do everything that you

00:56:45.656 --> 00:56:49.956
<v Riley Bowman>can get it to do on its own and you you just give it whatever extra it needs

00:56:49.956 --> 00:56:54.496
<v Riley Bowman>beyond that like but nothing nothing more nothing no more no less you just let

00:56:54.496 --> 00:56:58.416
<v Riley Bowman>the gun do its thing and then you just learn to give it,

00:56:59.793 --> 00:57:03.113
<v Riley Bowman>minimal amount that gets it to where you need it to be. And that's what we do

00:57:03.113 --> 00:57:05.693
<v Riley Bowman>in that recoil reprogramming exercise, which I think is so helpful.

00:57:06.313 --> 00:57:09.733
<v Riley Bowman>So again, as we mentioned in the beginning of the episode, one of the sponsors

00:57:09.733 --> 00:57:13.593
<v Riley Bowman>of this episode is the Pistol Intelligence online video course,

00:57:13.773 --> 00:57:18.013
<v Riley Bowman>which you can see so much of this in work, in practice.

00:57:20.293 --> 00:57:24.293
<v Riley Bowman>That video course was filmed in a live class.

00:57:24.793 --> 00:57:29.793
<v Riley Bowman>In fact, you mentioned the Active Self-Protection crew john korea and a number

00:57:29.793 --> 00:57:33.773
<v Riley Bowman>of their team were in attendance in that that class effective given full credit

00:57:33.773 --> 00:57:37.993
<v Riley Bowman>they ultimately are the ones that filmed that they brought that course and gave

00:57:37.993 --> 00:57:42.513
<v Riley Bowman>us you know the rights to be able to also do our own edits and and put that up on our site as well.

00:57:43.773 --> 00:57:47.553
<v Riley Bowman>And that's where you know i said there was something that got missed and uh

00:57:47.553 --> 00:57:50.633
<v Riley Bowman>so corey and i had to get to the range and film that because i just like yeah

00:57:50.633 --> 00:57:53.333
<v Riley Bowman>this can't be missing it's got to be in there it's got to be a part of this

00:57:53.333 --> 00:57:57.133
<v Riley Bowman>uh but ultimately it's a great course and you can see Again,

00:57:57.353 --> 00:57:59.733
<v Riley Bowman>you can hear me explain all this stuff, teach this stuff,

00:58:00.113 --> 00:58:04.513
<v Riley Bowman>see it demoed, see other students on the line as they are experimenting and

00:58:04.513 --> 00:58:07.733
<v Riley Bowman>trying and learning the things that we teach in the Pistol Intelligence course.

00:58:08.653 --> 00:58:12.433
<v Riley Bowman>And that's all right there for you to watch in the comfort of your own home.

00:58:12.833 --> 00:58:15.893
<v Riley Bowman>Plus a workbook is part of that.

00:58:16.353 --> 00:58:19.973
<v Riley Bowman>So you can follow along. You can review things.

00:58:19.973 --> 00:58:23.713
<v Riley Bowman>You can take things to the range and try the different drills and things that

00:58:23.713 --> 00:58:26.373
<v Riley Bowman>we cover in that curriculum on your own.

00:58:26.373 --> 00:58:29.133
<v Riley Bowman>Obviously it's even more effective when you

00:58:29.133 --> 00:58:31.793
<v Riley Bowman>can attend a class in person uh which you know i'd

00:58:31.793 --> 00:58:35.453
<v Riley Bowman>love to be able to see you in one of my classes in the future but the

00:58:35.453 --> 00:58:39.273
<v Riley Bowman>video course i think is pretty excellent in being able to communicate the the

00:58:39.273 --> 00:58:44.773
<v Riley Bowman>core concepts of the of the curriculum yeah so concealed carry.com forward slash

00:58:44.773 --> 00:58:49.033
<v Riley Bowman>piq course the link for that and then again we want to make sure we recognize

00:58:49.033 --> 00:58:53.473
<v Riley Bowman>our other main episode sponsor today of course they're a title sponsor of the episode, and that is HK.

00:58:53.933 --> 00:58:57.073
<v Riley Bowman>And we appreciate them so much and hope that you'll consider for your next gun

00:58:57.073 --> 00:58:59.233
<v Riley Bowman>an HK pistol or rifle or whatever.

00:58:59.473 --> 00:59:02.053
<v Riley Bowman>Head on over to hk-usa.com to learn more.

00:59:02.935 --> 00:59:03.635
<v Riley Bowman>Anything else, Jacob?

00:59:04.195 --> 00:59:05.995
<v Jacob Paulsen>No, I think that's a wrap.

00:59:06.575 --> 00:59:10.415
<v Riley Bowman>Awesome. So with that, we'll leave you guys to go. Before we do,

00:59:10.675 --> 00:59:16.875
<v Riley Bowman>please like, subscribe, share, comment, anything you could do to interact with

00:59:16.875 --> 00:59:19.395
<v Riley Bowman>and help share and spread the word about the podcast.

00:59:19.415 --> 00:59:22.795
<v Riley Bowman>And our mission here at concealedcarry.com is greatly appreciated.

00:59:23.235 --> 00:59:27.535
<v Riley Bowman>It helps us a lot. It helps us tremendously. It allows us to keep doing what

00:59:27.535 --> 00:59:32.755
<v Riley Bowman>we do here. If you enjoy this content, we hope that you'll just do a small thing

00:59:32.755 --> 00:59:33.955
<v Riley Bowman>and help share and spread the word.

00:59:34.455 --> 00:59:39.335
<v Riley Bowman>So with that, a reminder to train right, train often, and train safe so you can fight hard.

00:59:39.495 --> 00:59:42.095
<v Jacob Paulsen>Fight fast, and fight true. Take care.

00:59:42.295 --> 00:59:42.795
<v Riley Bowman>Take care, everybody.

00:59:56.498 --> 00:59:58.758
<v Riley Bowman>A reminder that laws vary from place to place, and we encourage listeners to

00:59:58.758 --> 01:00:00.698
<v Riley Bowman>seek local legal advice to understand applicable laws.

01:00:01.058 --> 01:00:03.158
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, Inc., its brands and properties, and the Concealed Carry podcast

01:00:03.158 --> 01:00:04.898
<v Riley Bowman>is not a legal service, nor are we attorneys at law.

01:00:05.078 --> 01:00:07.398
<v Riley Bowman>We make our best faith effort to share Concealed Carry-related insights and

01:00:07.398 --> 01:00:09.518
<v Riley Bowman>information about firearm-related incidents and the laws pertaining,

01:00:09.718 --> 01:00:10.998
<v Riley Bowman>based on our own understanding and experience.

01:00:11.278 --> 01:00:13.538
<v Riley Bowman>But things can be different where you live, or laws may have changed by the

01:00:13.538 --> 01:00:16.018
<v Riley Bowman>time you listen to this. We cannot be held liable for your actions based on

01:00:16.018 --> 01:00:17.058
<v Riley Bowman>the information shared in this podcast.

01:00:17.378 --> 01:00:19.398
<v Riley Bowman>Please exercise care with all things pertaining to firearm use,

01:00:19.598 --> 01:00:22.018
<v Riley Bowman>Concealed Carry, and always practice following basic firearm safety rules.

01:00:22.298 --> 01:00:25.398
<v Riley Bowman>More information about safety can be found at concealedcarry.com forward slash safety.

